Skip to main content
  • 87 Accesses

Abstract

“The essence of solitude … is a sense of choice and control…. You choose to leave and return.”1 That is, if you can choose, and involuntary confinement (e.g., prisons) is not the only alternative of choice; nor, as is clear from the previous chapters, is it the only state of involuntary solitude. As some of the works demonstrate, our inhibitions of choice are many, and are often psychogenically involuntary. At times, “return” is nearly impossible, and we are irretrievably beyond it, although no external force holds us prisoner.

Privacy is freedom from social contact and observation when these are not desired; and Solitude is the lack of desired contact.

—Paul Halmos, Solitude and Privacy (1952)

Our attitude to solitude … is extremely paradoxical. We need it; we suffer from it; and we flee from it. Potentially positive, solitude is often painful …

—Joanne Wieland-Burston, Contemporary Solitude: The Joy and Pain of Being Alone (1996)

[T]oo much solitude makes of one an animal.

—J. M. Coetzee, In the Heart of the Country

[T]he word “I” is as hollow as the word “death.”

Richard Rorty, Contingency, Irony, Solidarity (1989)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Janna Malamud Smith, Private Matters: In Defense of the Personal Life (Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1997), 37.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Samuel Beckett, The Lost Ones (New York: Grove Press, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Erwin Möde, Die Neue Einsamkeit der Postmoderne (Munchen: Edition Psychosymbolik, 1995), 80, 13, 113.

    Google Scholar 

  4. On the transition from Modernism to Postmodernism see Gianni Vattimo, The End of Modernity: Nihilism and Hermeneutics in Postmodern Culture, tr. Jon R. Snyder (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1988);

    Google Scholar 

  5. Philip Solomon, Modernism/Postmodernism, ed. Peter Brooker (London: Longman Group UK, 1992);

    Google Scholar 

  6. James Brusseau, Isolated Experiences: Gilles Deleuze and the Solitudes of Reversed Platonism (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998), 176–177.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Soren Kierkegaard, The Sickness Unto Death, ed. and tr. Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980), 65.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Richard Rorty, Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 29.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Elizabeth Cady Stanton, “Solitude of Self” (1892) in The Search for Self-Sovereignty: The Oratory of Elizabeth Cady Stanton, ed. Beth M. Waggenspack (New York: Greenwood Press, 1989), 159–167.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Amy M. Spindler, “Tracing the Look of Alienation,” New York Times (March 24, 1998), D28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2001 Edward Engelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Engelberg, E. (2001). Conclusion. In: Solitude and Its Ambiguities in Modernist Fiction. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10598-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics