Solitude of Questionable Freedom in Cartesian Antagonists: Sartre and Camus

  • Edward Engelberg

Abstract

“Cartesian” is one of those stubborn concepts we have encoded into our critical thinking and have applied, loosely to be sure, to any mind/body dualism, especially as it may occur in philosophy or literature. Two philosophers have recently attempted to clarify and correct what they have called the “Cartesian Legend.” First they summarize that legend’s major points: “It is common knowledge that Descartes was a Cartesian Dualist…. As everyone knows he held that there are two worlds, one of mental objects and one of material things…. The mental objects are ‘states of consciousness’ … the material objects are … bits of ‘clockwork.’” We perceive the “‘inner world’” by means of “introspection”; the “‘outer world’” is apprehended by “the five senses.” Although Body and Mind are “independent,” they are nevertheless held together by “causal interaction.” The authors suggest that such a reading of Descartes, especially among Anglo-Americans, perpetuates the “legend,” and they proceed to demonstrate what, in their view, Descartes really meant—in short to undo the damage of the “legend” and to posit a more accurate account of “Cartesian.”1 The problem, of course, is that the “Cartesian Legend”—assuming the authors are correct—is what, for better or worse, the culture has absorbed, and so one can with some degree of certainty use it when dealing with Sartre and Camus.

Keywords

Sugar Beach Resi Posit Burial 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Gordon Baker and Katherine J. Morris, Descartes’ Dualism (London: Routledge, 1996), 1.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    For the Cartesian element in La Nausée see Jaques Deguy, La Nausée de Jean-Paul Sartre (Paris: Gallimard, 1993) particularly the section entitled “Un Type dans le Genre de Descartes,” 44–70.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Steven G. Kellman, La Nausée in The Self-Begetting Novel (New York: Columbia University Press, 1980), 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    For an elegant discussion of the antihero, see Victor Brombert, In Praise of Antiheroes: Figures and Themes in Modern European Literature 1830–1980 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999), 1–9.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    See especiallyGoogle Scholar
  6. Terry Keefe, “The Ending of Sartre’s La Nausée,” in Critical Essays on Jean Paul Sartre, ed. Robert Wilcocks (Boston: G. K. Hall, 1988), 182–201.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    Olivier Todd, Albert Camus: A Life, tr. Benjamin Ivry (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1987), 85.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Camus, Notebooks, 1915–1942, tr. Philip Thody (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1963), 105.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    Iris Murdoch, Sartre: Romantic Rationalist (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1953), 13.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    Margaret Walker, “The Nausea of Sartre,” Yale Review, 42, 2 (December 1952): 253.Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    See, for example Sydney Mendell, “From Solitude to Salvation: A Study in Development,” Yale French Studies 30 (1964): 45–54.Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    Claude-Edmonde Magny, “The Duplicity of Being,” in Sartre: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Edith Kearn (Englewood, NJ: Prentuce Hall, 1962), 25–26.Google Scholar
  13. 15.
    Margot Kruse, “Philosophie und Dichtung in Sartres La Nausée,” Romanistisches Jahrbuch IX (1958): 217, 218, 225.Google Scholar
  14. 17.
    Henri Peyre, French Novelists of Today (New York: Oxford University Press, 1967), 260.Google Scholar
  15. Leo Pollmann ascribes the title Mélancolie to Sartre himself. Sartre and Camus: Literature of Existence tr. Helen Sebba and Gregor Sebba (New York: Ungar Publishing, 1967), 11.Google Scholar
  16. 18.
    Rhiannon Goldthorpe, “The Presentation of Consciousness in Sartre’s La Nausée and its Theoretical Basis: Reflections and Facticity,” French Studies XXII, 2 (1968): 120, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Much of this essay is expanded and refined in Goldthorpe’s Sartre: Literary Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
  18. See also Fredric Jameson, Sartre: The Origins of a Style (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1952): The ‘nausea’… is the moment of feeling acutely that we exist…. (33).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Victor Brombert, The Intellectual Hero: Studies in the French Novel, 1880–1955 (Philadelphia: J. P. Lipnicott, 1960), 145, 182, 194–195.Google Scholar
  20. 22.
    W. Wolfgang Holdheim, “The Cogito in Sartre’s La Nausée,” in The Comparative Perspective in Literature: An Approach to Theory and Practice, ed. Clayton Koelb and Susan Noakes (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988), 179–194Google Scholar
  21. See also Jean Boorsh, “Sartre’s View of Cartesian Liberty,” Yale French Studies I 1 (Spring–Summer, 1948): 90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 23.
    Robert Champigny, Stages on Sartre’s Way (New York: Kraus Reprint Corporation, 1968), 30, 31, 41–42.Google Scholar
  23. 24.
    Francis Jeanson, “Hell and Bastardy,” Yale French Studies 30 (1964): 10, 12, 19.Google Scholar
  24. 25.
    Albert Camus, The Myth of Sisyphus and Other Essays, tr. Justin O’Brien (New York: Vintage Books, 1955), 10–11.Google Scholar
  25. See Theodore Ziolkowski, “The Crisis of the Thirty-Year Old in Modern Fiction: Toward a Phenomenology of the Novel,” in Comparatists at Work: Studies in Comparative Literature, ed., Stephen G. Nichols, Jr. and Richard B. Vowles (Waltham, MA: Blaisdall Publishing, 1968).Google Scholar
  26. 30.
    Albert Camus, The Stranger, tr. Matthew Ward (New York: Vintage Books, 1989), 34–35.Google Scholar
  27. 31.
    Jean Sarocchi, in his Afterword to A Happy Death tr. Richard Howard (New York: Vintage Books, 1972) calls the earlier novel a “prefiguration” of The Stranger 167.Google Scholar
  28. Roger Quilliot devotes a number of pages comparing the two novels in The Sea and Prisons: A Commentary on the Life and Thought of Albert Camus tr. Emmett Parker (University, AL: University of Alabama Press, 1970), 66–68.Google Scholar
  29. 36.
    See Ray Davison, Camus: The Challenge ofDostoyevsky (Exeter: Exeter University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
  30. 38.
    Irving Massey, The Uncreating Word: Romanticism and the Object (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1970), 42, 21.Google Scholar
  31. 39.
    Our focus remains on the experience of Meursault’s solitude. In Critical Essays on Albert Camus ed. Bettina L. Knapp (Boston: G. K. Hall, 1988), Henri Peyre offers an annotated overview of Camus criticism: “Presence of Camus,” 15–36.Google Scholar
  32. 40.
    Roland Barthes, Writing Degree Zero, tr. Annette Levers and Colin Smith (New York: Hill and Wang, 1953), 77.Google Scholar
  33. William M. Manly offers a subtler account in “Journey to Consciousness: The Symbolic Pattern of Camus’s L’Etranger,” PMLA LXXIX (June 1964): 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. But the most provocative essay on this subject is Gilbert D. Chaitin’s Lacanian reading, “The Birth of the Subject in Camus’ L’Etranger,” Romanic Review, 84, 2 (1993) 163–180.Google Scholar
  35. 42.
    The quotations from “The Artist at Work” are from Albert Camus, Exile and the Kingdom, tr. Justin O’Brien (New York: Vintage Books, 1958), 110–158.Google Scholar
  36. See also two Catholic critics: Marion Mitchell Stanicoff, “Camus: Solitary or Solidary?,” America: National Catholic Weekly Review XLVIII, 13 (January 4, 1958): 395–397Google Scholar
  37. Bernard Murchland, “Between Solitude and Solidarity,” Commonweal XCII 1 (October 23, 1970): 91–95.Google Scholar
  38. Brian T. Fitch, The Narcissistic Text: A Reading of Camus’ Fiction (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1982), 35, 43–44.Google Scholar
  39. For a chapter devoted to this story, see English Showalter, Jr., Exiles and Strangers: A Reading of Camus’s ‘Exile and the Kingdom’ (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1984), 89–106.Google Scholar
  40. 46.
    G. V. Banks, Camus: L’Etranger (London: Edward Arnold, 1976), 38.Google Scholar
  41. See, for example Conor Cruise O’Brien, Albert Camus of Europe and Africa (New York: The Viking Press, 1970) chapter on The Stranger;Google Scholar
  42. Jan Rigaud, “The Depiction of Arabs in L’Etranger”; Camus’s L’Etranger: Fifty Years On, ed. Adele King (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1992), 183–192 a much more balanced and inci- sive analysis of the issue than O’Brien’s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 47.
    Robert J. Champigny, A Pagan Hero: An Interpretation of Meursault in Camus’ The Stanger, tr. Rowe Portis (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1969), 19, 87.Google Scholar
  44. 48.
    Maurice Blanchot, The Space of Literature tr. Ann Smock (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1982), 31 (note), 252.Google Scholar
  45. See also Blanchot, The Gaze of Orpheus and Other Literary Essays, tr. Lydia Davis (Barrytown, NY: Station Hill Press, 1981), 63–77.Google Scholar
  46. 51.
    David Sprintzen, Camus: A Critical Examination (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1988), 126–127.Google Scholar
  47. 52.
    Patrick McCarthy, Albert Camus: The Stranger’ (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 61.Google Scholar
  48. 53.
    Perhaps one of the major triggers of this reaction (aside from the moralistic tone of the decade itself) was the publication of Renée Girard’s “Camus’s Stranger Retried,” PMLA LXXIX 5 (December, 1964): 519–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jack Murray, “Closure and Anticlosure in Camus’s ‘LEtranger’: Some Ideological Considerations,” Symposium XLVI (Fall 1992): 231.Google Scholar
  50. 57.
    Albert Camus, The Rebel: An Essay on Man in Revolt, tr. Anthony Bower (New York: Vintage Books, 1956), 280–281.Google Scholar
  51. For an imaginative account of Meursault as something less than a rebel against society see Ignace Feuerlicht, “Camus’s L’Etranger Reconsidered,” PMLA LXXVIII (December 1963): 606–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Edward Engelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward Engelberg

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations