Skip to main content

Intangible Assets

  • Chapter
Global Financial Reporting
  • 68 Accesses

Abstract

There is general agreement that the intangible assets of enterprises have grown enormously in importance in recent years. This is the culmination of a long-term trend. When double-entry book-keeping was first developed in medieval Italy, the first practitioners of the art were bankers and merchants whose principal assets were cash, business debts, stocks of merchandise and other physical objects, such as buildings and ships. The existing asset categories (monetary assets and tangible assets) served the needs of these early book-keepers very well. Later, during the Industrial Revolution of the eighteenth and nineteenth century, there was a great increase in the magnitude and range of assets owned by enterprises but almost all were in the form of tangible assets, such as the locomotives, carriages, bridges, tunnels and tracks of the first railways and the spinning jennies and automatic looms of the early cotton mills. The existing accounting model served the needs of these enterprises quite adequately. However, gradually over the next two centuries, intangible assets became more significant; assets such as the enterprise’s reputation with its customers, its skilled and experienced workforce, its organizational structure and its store of technical knowledge. The existing accounting model has difficulty in coping with these intangible assets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aboody, D and Lev, B ‘The value relevance of intangibles: the case of software capitalization’, Journal of Accounting Research 36 (Supplement) (1998), pp. 161–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Company Reporting ‘Intangible Assets’, Company Reporting (June 1998), pp. 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist, The ‘A price on the priceless’, The Economist, (June 1999), pp. 72–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvinsson, L ‘Developing intellectual capital at Skandia’, Long Range Planning, 30 (June 1997), pp. 366–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinyer, JR, Russel, A and Walker, M ‘The Rationale for Accounting for Goodwill’, British Accounting Review, 22(3) (1990), pp. 223–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IASC Exposure Draft E60 Intangible Assets, IASC, London (August 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, B, ‘The boundaries of financial reporting and how to extend them’, Working paper, University of California, Berkeley (August 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, B ‘R&D and capital markets’, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 11(4) (Winter 1999), pp. 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd Johnson, L and Petrone, KR ‘Is Goodwill an asset?’, Accounting Horizons, 12(3) (September 1998), pp. 293–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2002 John Flower

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flower, J., Ebbers, G. (2002). Intangible Assets. In: Global Financial Reporting. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10538-7_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics