Advertisement

Avoiding Chemical Warfare 1939–45

  • Edward M. Spiers

Abstract

When the Second World War erupted there was a widespread, and quite reasonable, expectation that poison gas would be used. Various gases had been employed in an increasingly extensive fashion during the later years of the Great War, and, despite the signing of the Geneva Protocol, poison gas still seemed a potent weapon, especially in view of its use in Ethiopia and its reported use by the Japanese in China. The great powers prepared for the worst; they feared that their opponents possessed either large stocks of chemical weapons or the potential to produce such stocks. They strove to improve their own defences, both civilian and military, and to acquire the means of deterrence through a retaliatory capability. As the threat of gas was ever present, it proved a lasting concern for political leaders and their military advisers. What warrants analysis is not simply why these weapons were not used — in respect of the balance of incentives and disincentives (an analysis already expertly done)1 — but also how the policy of deterrence evolved and developed during the conflict.

Keywords

High Explosive Chemical Weapon General Staff Arsenic Trichloride Spray Tank 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    SIPRI, The Problem of Chemical and Biological Warfare, vol. 1, pp. 294–335.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ‘Notification by the British Government to the German Government on the Outbreak of War Relative to the Geneva Protocol’, PRO, WO 193/711 and The Times, 2 September 1939, p. 9.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ‘Review of the Effects of the Offensive Use of Chemical Warfare in a War Such as is Envisaged in the European Appreciation, 1939’, p. 4, PRO, WO 193/713. A Brief History of… Porton,p. 23.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ‘Interrogation of German Air Ministry (OKL) Technical Personnel Luftwaffe Lager, near Kiel’, B(ritish) I(ntelligence) O(bjectives) S(ubcommittee), Report No. 9, pp. 96, 101, 105 and 109.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ‘Interrogation of Certain German Personalities Connected with Chemical Warfare’, BIOS, Report No. 542, pp. 22–3.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. J. Brown, Chemical Warfare, pp. 238–41;Google Scholar
  7. and SIPRI, The Problem of Chemical and Biological Warfare, vol. 1, p. 303.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    ‘Interrogation of German CW Personnel at Heidelberg and Frankfurt’, BIOS, Report No. 41, pp. 9 and 11.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    H. Ochsner, History of German Chemical Warfare: Pt. I, p. 15.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    Col. V. Pozdnyakov, ‘The Chemical Arm’, The Soviet Army, ed. B. H. Liddell Hart (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1956) pp. 384–90.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    SIPRI, The Problem of Chemical and Biological Warfare, vol. 1, pp. 290–1;Google Scholar
  12. ‘Chemical Warfare-Paris Area’, C(ombined) I(ntelligence) O(bjectives) S(ub-Committee) II/1.Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    ‘The manufacture of CW materials by the Japanese’, BIOS/JAP/PR/395, pp. 2–3.Google Scholar
  14. 12.
    ‘Report on Scientific Intelligence Survey in Japan, September and October 1945’, BIOS/JAP/PR/745, pp. 3–4;Google Scholar
  15. ‘Development of Chemical Warfare Training in the Japanese Air Force’, BIOS/JAP/PR/186, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
  16. 13.
    ‘Japanese Chemical Warfare Training Offensive and Defensive’, BIOS/JAP/PR/685, p. 18;Google Scholar
  17. ‘Intelligence Report on Japanese Chemical Warfare, vol. 1 “General Organization Policies and Intentions Tactics” ‘, BIOS/JAP/PR/1338, p. 17.Google Scholar
  18. 14.
    BIOS/JAP/PR/685, p. 113;Google Scholar
  19. BIOS/JAP/PR/745, p. 43;Google Scholar
  20. BIOS/JAP/PR/1338, pp. 5, 21;Google Scholar
  21. Brig-Gen. J. H. Rothschild, Tomorrow’s Weapons, p. 92.Google Scholar
  22. 15.
    BOS/JAP/PR/685, p. 114.Google Scholar
  23. 16.
    H. Ochsner, History of German Chemical Warfare, pp. 17–18;Google Scholar
  24. BIOS/JAP/PR/1338, p. 7;Google Scholar
  25. BIOS, Report No. 41, p. 6;Google Scholar
  26. ‘Examination of Various German Scientists’, BIOS, Report No. 44, p. 1.Google Scholar
  27. 17.
    General Staff Committee on Chemical Warfare, Proceedings of 6th meeting, 4 April 1940, PRO, WO 106/1627.Google Scholar
  28. 18.
    C(hiefs) O(f) S(taff), ‘Chemical Warfare Policy’, 25 April 1940, PRO, WO 193/713.Google Scholar
  29. 19.
    ‘The Use of Gas in Home Defence. Memorandum by CIGS’, 15 June 1940, PRO, WO 193/732.Google Scholar
  30. 20.
    Maj-Gen. K. M. Loch to Maj-Gen. R. H. Dewing, 16 June 1940, PRO, WO 193/732.Google Scholar
  31. 21.
    Brig. K. N. Crawford, ‘Memorandum on the Use of Gas in the Defence of the United Kingdom’, 21 June 1940, PRO, WO 193/732.Google Scholar
  32. 22.
    Churchill to Maj-Gen. Ismay, 30 June 1940, PRO, WO 193/732. See also M. Gilbert, Finest Hour Winston S. Churchill 1939–1941 (London: Heinemann, 1983) pp. 617–8.Google Scholar
  33. 23.
    Gen. Sir J. Dill to Maj-Gen. Ismay, 2 July 1940, PRO, WO 193/732.Google Scholar
  34. 24.
    Churchill to Maj-Gen. Ismay, 14 July 1940, Churchill Mss, 20/13, quoted in M. Gilbert, Finest Hour, p. 665.Google Scholar
  35. 25.
    Churchill, minute, 31 August 1940, PRO, PREM 3/88/3.Google Scholar
  36. 26.
    Churchill, minutes, 28 September and 6 October 1940, PRO, PREM 3/88/3.Google Scholar
  37. 27.
    Churchill, marginalia on minute of Sir E. Bridges, 20 November 1940, PRO, PREM 3/88/3.Google Scholar
  38. 28.
    Minutes of the first meeting of the RAF Committee on Chemical Warfare, 14 September 1940;Google Scholar
  39. and ‘Requirements of Phosgene Filled Bombs and Phosgene Gas Capacity for the Royal Air Force’, 25 December 1940, PRO, AIR 2/5117.Google Scholar
  40. 29.
    ‘Chemical Warfare’, Annex 1, p. 3 and COS (40) 345th meeting, 11 October 1940, PRO, WO 193/711 and CAB 79/7.Google Scholar
  41. 30.
    Correspondence between Director of Plans and Air Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Bomber Command, 19 and 23 January 1941;Google Scholar
  42. and ‘Contamination of Beaches by Gas Bombing as an Anti Invasion Measure,’ 1 November 1941, PRO, AIR 2/5117 and AIR 2/5200.Google Scholar
  43. 31.
    R. Harris and J. Paxman, A Higher Form of Killing, p. 115.Google Scholar
  44. 32.
    Gas stocks reports, PRO, PREM 3/88/3.Google Scholar
  45. 33.
    COS (41) 437th meeting, 28 December 1941, PRO, CAB 79/16.Google Scholar
  46. 34.
    ‘Chemical Warfare’, Annex 1, pp. 4–5, PRO, WO 193/711;Google Scholar
  47. ‘Memorandum on the Position in the Event of an Early Gas Blitz’, 10 February 1941, Weir Mss, 20/16.Google Scholar
  48. 35.
    A Brief History of … Porton, pp. 23–5.Google Scholar
  49. 36.
    Gas stocks reports, PRO, PREM 3/88/3.Google Scholar
  50. 37.
    COS, meeting, 9 December 1940, PRO, WO 193/725.Google Scholar
  51. 38.
    War Office to Commander in Chief Middle East, 12 December 1940;Google Scholar
  52. Lt-Gen. Sir A. Wavell to CIGS, 30 December 1940;Google Scholar
  53. COS, meeting, 1 January 1941;Google Scholar
  54. War Office to Lt-Gen. Wavell, 4 January 1941, PRO, WO 193/725.Google Scholar
  55. 39.
    W. S. Churchill, The Second World War, vol. IV (London: Cassell, 1951), p. 180 and pp. 294–5. See also 8th meeting of Defence Committee, 18 March 1942, PRO, CAB 69/4, DO(42) and COS (42) 94th meeting, 24 March 1942, PRO, CAB 79/19.Google Scholar
  56. 40.
    Minutes of 11 meeting of Defence Committee, 17 April 1942, and COS ‘Chemical Warfare. Report’, 13 April 1942, PRO, WO 193/711 and PREM 3/88/2.Google Scholar
  57. 41.
    A Brief History of … Porton, p. 26.Google Scholar
  58. 42.
    COS (42) 101st meeting, 31 March 1942, PRO, CAB 79/20. For an excellent account of British intelligence fears of chemical warfare, see F. H. Hinsley, British Intelligence in the Second World War: Its Influence on Strategy and Operations, vol. II (London: HMSO, 1981) pp. 116–23 and Appendix 6.Google Scholar
  59. 43.
    Quoted in COS, ‘Chemical Warfare Policy-Association of Commonwealth Governments’, 22 February 1944, PRO, PREM 3/89.Google Scholar
  60. 44.
    The Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt, compiled by S. I. Rosenman (New York: Harpers, 1950) 1942 vol. ‘Humanity on the Defensive’, p. 258.Google Scholar
  61. 45.
    L. P. Brophy and G. J. B. Fisher, The Chemical Warfare Service, pp. 54–7.Google Scholar
  62. 46.
    Ibid.,pp. 64–5;Google Scholar
  63. and COS,’Chemical Warfare Policy’, PRO,PREM3/89.Google Scholar
  64. 47.
    L. P. Brophy and G. J. B. Fisher, The Chemical Warfare Service, pp. 65–9.Google Scholar
  65. 48.
    Ibid., pp. 70–8.Google Scholar
  66. 49.
    R. Harris and J. Paxman, A Higher Form of Killing, pp. 116–17.Google Scholar
  67. 50.
    Records of the United States J(oint) C(hiefs of) S(taff), JCS 825/4, 29 September 1944 and 825/6, 13 June 1945, R.G. 218, National Archives, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  68. 51.
    F. H. Hinsley, British Intelligence in the Second World War, pp. 119–20.Google Scholar
  69. 52.
    Ibid., pp. 120–1.Google Scholar
  70. 53.
    COS, report (43)198(0), 19 April 1943, PRO, CAB 121/100 quoted in F. H. Hinsley, British Intelligence in the Second World War, p. 121.Google Scholar
  71. 54.
    The Times, 22 April 1943, p. 4. See also J. Stalin to Churchill, 19 April 1943 and the report of British gas stocks totalling 32 023 tons by 27 March 1943, PRO, PREM 3/88/3.Google Scholar
  72. 55.
    The Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1943 ‘The Tide Turns’, pp. 242–3.Google Scholar
  73. 56.
    COS, to Gen. D. D. Eisenhower, 8 September 1943, PRO, PREM 3/88/3.Google Scholar
  74. 57.
    The Times, 15 May 1942, p. 3.Google Scholar
  75. 58.
    The Times, 23 April, 1943, p. 3.Google Scholar
  76. 59.
    BIOS Report No. 542, p. 23.Google Scholar
  77. 60.
    H. Ochsner, History of German Chemical Warfare, p. 22;Google Scholar
  78. and ‘Examination of Various German Scientists’, BIOS Report No. 44, pp. 2–3.Google Scholar
  79. 61.
    A. Hitler, Mein Kampf (London: Hutchinson, 1969), p. 183.Google Scholar
  80. 62.
    BIOS Report No. 542, pp 24–5. See also H. Ochsner, History of German Chemical Warfare, p. 13;Google Scholar
  81. and BIOS Report No. 41, p. 6.Google Scholar
  82. 63.
    H. Ochsner, History of German Chemical Warfare, pp. 18, 21–2.Google Scholar
  83. 64.
    Ibid., pp. 22–3;Google Scholar
  84. and F. J. Brown, Chemical Warfare, p. 244.Google Scholar
  85. 65.
    BIOS Report No. 542, pp. 22–23;Google Scholar
  86. and A. Speer, Inside The Third Reich (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1970) p. 413.Google Scholar
  87. 66.
    ‘Chemical Warfare Installations in the Munsterlager Area’, CIOS, Report No. 31/86, Appendix II, p. 7.Google Scholar
  88. 67.
    B. Tannor, ‘C ml C Intelligence in European Theater’, Chemical Corps Journal, vol. 1, no. 3 (1947) p. 43;Google Scholar
  89. SIPRI, The Problem of Chemical and Biological Warfare, Vol. 1, p. 304.Google Scholar
  90. 68.
    The International Military Tribunal, Trial of the Major War Criminals (Nuremberg, 1948) vol. XVI, p. 527. See also A. Speer, Inside the Third Reich, pp. 413–14;Google Scholar
  91. and BIOS Report No. 542, p. 25.Google Scholar
  92. 69.
    V. Pozdnyakov, ‘The Chemical Arm’, pp. 390–1;Google Scholar
  93. and CIOS Report No. 31/86, Appendix IV, p. 31.Google Scholar
  94. 70.
    Churchill to Stalin, 9 April 1942, PRO, PREM 3/88/3.Google Scholar
  95. 71.
    Joint Plannning Staff, ‘Chemical Warfare in Connection with Crossbow’, 5 July 1944 and Chiefs of Staff to Churchill, 5 July 1944, PRO, PREM 3/89.Google Scholar
  96. 72.
    Churchill to H. Morrison, 4 July 1944, PRO, PREM 3/89.Google Scholar
  97. 73.
    Churchill to General Ismay for COS Committee, 6 July 1944, PRO, PREM 3/89.Google Scholar
  98. 74.
    Minutes of 227 meeting of COS Committee, 8 July 1944, PRO, WO 193/712.Google Scholar
  99. 75.
    R. Harris and J. Paxman, A Higher Form of Killing, p. 88. See also Lord Hankey to Churchill, 6 December 1941, PRO, PREM 3/65.Google Scholar
  100. 76.
    E. Brown to Churchill, 9 March 1944, PRO, PREM 3/65.Google Scholar
  101. 77.
    ‘Military Considerations Affecting the Initiation of Chemical and Other Special Forms of Warfare’, PRO, PREM 3/89.Google Scholar
  102. 78.
  103. 79.
  104. 80.
  105. 81.
    Gen. Ismay to Churchill, 28 July 1944, PRO, PREM 3/89.Google Scholar
  106. 82.
    Churchill to Ismay, 29 July 1944, PRO, PREM 3/89.Google Scholar
  107. 83.
    Admiral W. D. Leahy to C. Hull, 22 September 1944, JCS, 176/10.Google Scholar
  108. 84.
    Joint Intelligence Subcommittee, ‘The Use of Chemical Warfare by the Germans’, 29 January, 19 and 28 February, 28 March, and 23 April 1945, PRO, PREM 3/89.Google Scholar
  109. 85.
    COS meeting, 19 June 1945, PRO, WO 193/724.Google Scholar
  110. 86.
    D. Birdsell, ‘United States Army Chemical Warfare Service Logistics Overseas, World War II’ (Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania, PhD dissertation, 1962), p 489;Google Scholar
  111. and F. J. Brown, Chemical Warfare, pp. 262–5.Google Scholar
  112. 87.
    ‘Chemical Warfare Interim Report’, 29 November 1943, PRO, WO 106/4594A.Google Scholar
  113. 88.
    Admiral W. D. Leahy, I Was There (London: Gollancz, 1950) p. 512.Google Scholar
  114. 89.
    F. J. Brown, Chemical Warfare, pp. 267–9. See also D. E. Lilienthal, The Journals of David E. Lilienthal, 2 vols (New York: Harper & Row, 1964) vol. 2, p. 199;Google Scholar
  115. H. Riegelman, Caves of Biak (New York: Dial Press, 1955) p. 153.Google Scholar
  116. 90.
    JCS 825/5, 5 March 1945.Google Scholar
  117. 91.
    JCS 825/6, 13 June 1945.Google Scholar
  118. 92.
    JCS 825/8, 6 July 1945. See also J. E. van Courtland Moon, ‘Chemical Weapons and Deterrence: The World War II Experience’, International Security, vol. 8, no. 4 (Spring 1984) pp. 24–5.Google Scholar
  119. 93.
    JCS 825/7, 13 June 1945.Google Scholar
  120. 94.
    BIOS/JAP/PR/1338, pp. 8–9;Google Scholar
  121. ‘Japanese Chemical Warfare Policies and Intentions’, BIOS/JAP/PR/724, p. 5;Google Scholar
  122. BIOS/JAP/PR/745, p. CW-22-4;Google Scholar
  123. BIOS/JAP/PR/685, p. 114.Google Scholar
  124. 95.
    BIOS/JAP/PR/724, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
  125. 96.
    BIOS/JAP/PR/745, pp. CW-22-3–CW-22-4.Google Scholar
  126. 97.
    BIOS/JAP/PR/1338, pp. 9–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Edward M. Spiers 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward M. Spiers

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations