Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Failure of Disarmament

  • Chapter
Chemical Warfare

  • 58 Accesses

Abstract

German acceptance of the Armistice on 11 November 1918 occasioned immense relief from war-weary peoples and widespread hope that peace could now be secured on a lasting basis. President Woodrow Wilson, having led the United States into a ‘war to end war’, cherished the expectation of realising a permanent peace. Once the war had ended he envisaged the creation of a new international order, rooted in a League of Nations, which would be able to guarantee the rights and peace of all nations, whether large or small. At the peace conference in Versailles (1919), he gained the endorsement of the concept, with some modifications, by the other victorious powers and the approval of a Covenant which committed the League to see ‘the reduction of national armaments to the lowest point consistent with national safety’ (Article 8). This initiative, coupled with the drastic reduction of the German war machine, including its chemical capability (Versailles Treaty, Article 171), seemed to portend a new era in international relations. At the very least, it required each of the major nations to reassess its policy on chemical warfare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Maj-Gen. Sir A. Lynden-Bell to Maj-Gen. C. H. Harington, 25 March 1919, enclosing ‘Note by the General Staff on the Use of Gas’, PRO, WO 32/5180.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. S. Churchill to Maj-Gen. C. H. Harington, 28 March 1919, PRO, WO 32/5180.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Times, 21 June 1922, p. 12. See also Papers Relating to the F(oreign) R(elations of the) U(nited) S(tates), The Paris Peace Conference 1919, vol. 4 (Washington: US Government Printing Office, 1943) p. 362.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid., vol. 4, pp. 561–2.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Maj. V. Lefebure, ‘Chemical Warfare’, The Times, 13 September 1921, p. 6;

    Google Scholar 

  6. ‘Chemical Disarmament’, The National Review, vol. LXXVIII (Sept. 1921–Feb. 1922) pp. 51–9;

    Google Scholar 

  7. ‘Chemical Warfare: the possibility of its control’, Transactions of the Grotius Society, vol. VII (1921) pp. 153–166.

    Google Scholar 

  8. ‘Draft of the report of the Committee on Chemical Warfare Organisation’, Foulkes Mss, J 18.

    Google Scholar 

  9. War Cabinet minutes, 16 October 1919, PRO, CAB 23/12 and Secretary of the C(ommittee of) I(mperial) D(efence), ‘Chemical Warfare Policy’, 5 March 1924, PRO, WO 188/144.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. A. Fries and C. J. West, Chemical Warfare, pp. 23, 53–73;

    Google Scholar 

  11. and L. P. Brophy and G. J. B. Fisher, The Chemical Warfare Service: Organizing for War (Washington: Office of the Chief of Military History, Dept. of the Army, 1959) pp. 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. J. Brown, Chemical Warfare: A Study in Restraints (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968) p. 159.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gen. P. C. March, The Nation at War (New York: Doubleday, 1932) pp. 333–5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. J. Brown, Chemical Warfare, pp. 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maj-Gen. C. H. Harington to Churchill, 8 May 1919;

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sir A. Lynden-Bell to Harington, 10 May 1919;

    Google Scholar 

  17. and W. S. Churchill, minute, 12 May 1919, PRO, WO 32/5185 and WO 32/5184.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sir E. Montagu to Lord Chelmsford, 14 May 1919, Foulkes Mss, J 62.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lord Fisher, ‘Gas Warfare’, 17 May 1920, PRO, CAB 24/106.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Extract from the minutes of the League of Nations committee, 1 June 1920, PRO, WO 32/5185. See also E. M. Spiers, ‘Gas and the North-West Frontier’, The Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 6, no. 4 (December, 1983) pp. 94–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. ‘A Summary of Important Notes and Papers in connection with the Policy of gas warfare in order of dates from 1899’ and ‘Second Report of the Secretary of the Chemical Warfare Committee’, 31 March 1922, p. 7, PRO, WO 188/212 and WO 33/1014.

    Google Scholar 

  22. ‘First Report of the Secretary of the Chemical Warfare Committee’, 31 March 1921, pp. 8 and 21, PRO, WO 33/987B.

    Google Scholar 

  23. The New York Times, 6 June 1921, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  24. L. P. Brophy and G. J. B. Fisher, The Chemical Warfare Service, pp. 21–2. See also F. J. Brown, Chemical Warfare, pp. 87–93, 124–5.

    Google Scholar 

  25. The Times, 8 September 1921, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  26. The Times, 1 September 1921, p. 9;

    Google Scholar 

  27. and J. B. S. Haldane, Callinicus.

    Google Scholar 

  28. E. M. Spiers, ‘Gas and the North-West Frontier’, pp. 99–102.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Capt. S. J. M. Auld, ‘Chemical Warfare’, The Royal Engineers Journal (February, 1921) pp. 58–9.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Col. N. P. McCleland, ‘Notes on the Use of Gas in Open Warfare’, September 1925 and Comptroller, Chemical Warfare Research, ‘Use of Gas in Open Warfare’, 15 February 1926, PRO, WO 188/143.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Brig. C. H. Foulkes, ‘Lecture at Delhi on 16 January 1920 to the Viceroy, Commander-in-Chief and members of the Supreme Council’, Foulkes Mss, J63.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Brig. C. H. Foulkes, ‘Lecture at Delhi on 16 January 1920 to the Viceroy, Commander-in-Chief and members of the Supreme Council’, Foulkes Mss, J63. See also B.H.Liddell Hart, Paris or the Future of War (London: Kegan Paul, 1925) pp. 50–5,

    Google Scholar 

  33. and The Remaking of Modern Armies (London: John Murray, 1927) pp. 80–7;

    Google Scholar 

  34. S. J. M. Auld, ‘Chemical Warfare’, pp. 60–71;

    Google Scholar 

  35. Col. J. F. C. Fuller, The Reformation of War (London: Hutchinson, 1923)pp. 108–11, 121–35, 154–5;

    Google Scholar 

  36. A. A. Fries and C. J. West, Chemical Warfare, pp. 435–9.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gen. J. J. Pershing to Sen. W. E. Borah, 10 December 1926, Pershing Mss, Library of Congress, Box 81;

    Google Scholar 

  38. and Sir H. Wilson, memoranda on gas warfare, 16 April 1920 and June 1920, PRO, WO 32/5185.

    Google Scholar 

  39. The New York Times, 8 January 1922, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Conference on the Limitation of Armament, Washington November 12, 1921–February 6,1922 (Washington, 1922) pp. 730, 732, 734, 736. See also the notes in the Pershing Mss, Box 81.

    Google Scholar 

  41. A. J. Balfour to Lloyd George, 6 January 1922, PRO, WO 188/144.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Conference on the Limitation of Armament, p. 748.

    Google Scholar 

  43. FRUS, 1922, vol. l, p. 269.

    Google Scholar 

  44. F. J. Brown, Chemical Warfare, pp. 93–5;

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sir R. Horne, ‘Gas Warfare’, 22 June 1922, and CID, ‘Chemical Warfare Policy’, 5 March 1924, PRO,

    Google Scholar 

  46. WO 188/144. See also First Report of the Secretary of the Chemical Warfare Committee, 31 March 1921, PRO, WO 33/987B.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gen.F. R.L. Cavan,’Chemical Warfare Policy’, 23 February 1924, PRO, CAB 4/11.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gen.F. R.L. Cavan,’Chemical Warfare Policy’, 23 February 1924, PRO, CAB 4/11. See also B. H. Liddell Hart, ‘Germany and Gas Tactics’, The Times, 12 November 1924, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  49. League of Nations, ‘Report of the Temporary Mixed Commission for the Reduction of Armaments’, 30 July 1924, A.16 1924. IX, p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  50. League of Nations, Proceedings of the Conference for the Supervision of the International Trade in Arms and Ammunition and on Implements of War. Held at Geneva, May 4th to June 17th, 1925. Verbatim report of First Meeting of the General Committee (7 May 1925), Document A. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  51. IX, p. 155.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ibid., Verbatim report of the Seventeenth Meeting (5 June 1925), p. 307 and of the Fourteenth Meeting of the Military, Naval and Air Technical Committee, 26 May 1925, Part II, pp. 532–41.

    Google Scholar 

  53. The New York Times, 6 June 1925, p. 1;

    Google Scholar 

  54. and League of Nations, Proceedings of the Conference, Verbatim Report of the Seventeenth Meeting (5 June 1925) p. 314.

    Google Scholar 

  55. League of Nations, Proceedings of the Conference, pp. 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  56. United States Senate, Congressional Record, 69th Congress, 2nd Session, 1926(LCVIII)p. 152.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ibid., p. 144.

    Google Scholar 

  58. The Times, 1 May 1929, p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  59. A Brief History of the Chemical Defence Experimental Establishment, Porton (March 1961) pp. 17–18. See also R. Harris and J. Paxman, A Higher Form of Killing, pp. 46–7.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Minutes of 215 and 217 Meetings of the CID, 22 July and 11 November 1926, PRO, CAB 2/4.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Minutes of 221 Meeting of the CID, 25 February 1927, PRO, CAB 2/5.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Compare R. Harris and J. Paxman, A Higher Form of Killing, p. 44 with E. M. Spiers, ‘Gas and the North-West Frontier’, pp. 94–112.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Tenth, Fourteenth and Seventeenth Reports of the C(hemical) W(arfare (later Defence) and) R(esearch) D(epartment), 31 March 1930, 31 March 1934 and 31 March 1937, PRO, WO 33/1231, 33/1359 and 33/1484.

    Google Scholar 

  64. ‘Policy with regard to the possible use of gas as a retaliatory measure in war’, 23 June 1936, PRO, CAB 4/24.

    Google Scholar 

  65. House of Lords, Fifth Ser., vol. 71 (11 July 1928) cols. 980–2;

    Google Scholar 

  66. See also Seventh report of the CWRD, 31 March 1927, PRO, WO 33/1153.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Parl. Deb., Fifth Ser., vol. 229 (9 July 1929) col. 683.

    Google Scholar 

  68. G. Woker, ‘Chemical and Bacteriological Warfare’, in Inter-Parliamentary Union, What Would be the Character of A New War? (London: Gollancz, 1933) pp. 368–72;

    Google Scholar 

  69. and H. G. Wells, The Shape of Things to Come (London: Hutchinson, 1935), p. 132.

    Google Scholar 

  70. P. Noel-Baker, Disarmament (London: Hogarth Press, 1926) p. 47;

    Google Scholar 

  71. H. G. Wells, The Shape of Things to Come p. 133;

    Google Scholar 

  72. B. Russell, Which Way to Peace? (London: M. Joseph, 1936) p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Compare with J. Kendall, Breathe Freely! The Truth about Poison Gas (London: G. Bell, 1938) pp. 15, 73.

    Google Scholar 

  74. House of Lords, Fifth Ser., vol. 71 (11 July 1928) col. 972. See also G. Woker, ‘Chemical and Bacteriological Warfare’, p. 363 and J. Kendall, Breathe Freely, pp. 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  75. G. Woker, ‘Chemical and Bacteriological Warfare’, p. 356;

    Google Scholar 

  76. Viscount Cecil, The Great Experiment (London: J. Cape, 1941) pp. 183–4.

    Google Scholar 

  77. V. Lefebure, ‘Chemical Warfare: The Possibility of Its Control’, pp. 156–64;

    Google Scholar 

  78. P. Noel-Baker, Disarmament, pp. 281–5;

    Google Scholar 

  79. and The Times, 7 December 1928, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Parl. Deb., Fifth Ser., vol. 262 (1 March 1932) col. 921. On the disarmament movement, see J. J. Underwood, ‘The Roots and Reality of British Disarmament Policy 1932–1934’, unpublished PhD thesis (Leeds University, 1977) pp. 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  81. P. Noel-Baker, The First World Disarmament Conference 1932–33 (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1979) pp. 69–71, 74–8, 81–2;

    Google Scholar 

  82. Sir J. Simon, speech, 8 February 1932, PRO, FO 411/15, no. 6;

    Google Scholar 

  83. H. Hoover, ‘Disarmament plan’, 22 June 1932, FRUS (1932) vol. 1, pp. 179–82.

    Google Scholar 

  84. H. S. Gibson to W. R. Castle, 10 May 1932, FRUS (1932) vol. 1, pp. 120–1.

    Google Scholar 

  85. H. L. Stimson to H. R. Wilson, 21 September 1932, FRUS (1932) vol. 1, p. 333.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Documents on British Foreign Policy, Second Series, vol IV (London: HMSO, 1950) pp. 558–65. For the draft convention, see PRO, CAB 24/239, CP 74(33).

    Google Scholar 

  87. H. L. Stimson to H. R. Wilson, 12 November 1932, FRUS (1932) vol. 1, p. 377.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Minutes of 384th meeting of the Army Council, 30 July 1935 and Air Ministry letter, 30 August 1935, PRO, WO 32/4315 and WO 32/3663;

    Google Scholar 

  89. T. H. O’Brien, Civil Defence (London: HMSO, 1955), pp. 51–2, 58.

    Google Scholar 

  90. League of Nations, Series of Publications 1936, C.201.M.126., 1936, VII, especially appendices 3 and 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Il Gironale d’Italia, 9 April 1936, p. 1. See also letter from the Italian Government to the Council and Members of the League, 30 April 1936, C.208.M.130., 1936, VII.

    Google Scholar 

  92. The Times, 20 April 1936, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  93. League of Nations, Official Journal (April 1936), 91 session of the Council, 10th meeting, 20 April 1936, p. 380.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Seventeenth report of the CDRD, 31 March 1937, PRO, WO 33/1484. See also Minutes of 221 Meeting of the CID, 25 February 1927;

    Google Scholar 

  95. Ninth report of the CWRD, 31 March 1929;

    Google Scholar 

  96. and ‘Offensive Gas Warfare Methods’, Enclosure 45A, 7 September 1936, PRO, CAB 2/5;

    Google Scholar 

  97. WO 33/1204;

    Google Scholar 

  98. WO 32/3663. See also H. Ochsner, History of German Chemical Warfare in World War II Part I the Military Aspect (Historical Office of the Chief of the Chemical Corps, 1949) p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Enclosure 45A, and the Nineteenth report of the CDRD, 31 December 1938, PRO, WO 32/3663 and WO 33/1634.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Ibid., and League of Nations, Official Journal, 102 and 103 sessions, 19 September and 30 November 1938, pp. 863–65 and 878–81.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Eighth and Nineteenth reports of CWRD, and CDRD, 31 March 1928 and 31 December 1938, PRO, WO 33/174 and WO 33/1634.

    Google Scholar 

  102. T. H. O’Brien, Civil Defence., pp. 58–9, 67–71, 76–82, 100–1, 230–3.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Seventeenth and Nineteenth reports of the CDRD, 31 March 1937 and 31 December 1938, PRO, WO 33/1484 and 33/1634.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Minutes of the 280 meeting of the CID, 10 July 1936 and A. Duff Cooper to Sir C. Deverell, 26 November 1936, PRO, CAB 2/6 and WO 32/3663. See also Col. Henry Pownall, diary, 9 July 1936, The Diaries of Lieutenant-General Sir Henry Pownall, ed. B. Bond (London: Leo Cooper, 1972) vol. 1, p. 115.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Minutes 5 and 6, and Sir C. Deverell, ‘Development of Gas Weapons and Apparatus for Offensive Purposes’, 3 November 1936, PRO, WO 32/3663;

    Google Scholar 

  106. and P. Harris, ‘British Preparations for Offensive Chemical Warfare 1935–39’, Journal of the Royal United Services Institute for Defence Studies, vol. 125, no. 2 (June 1980) p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Enclosure 62A, 13 April 1937;

    Google Scholar 

  108. Minutes 64, 73 and 121, 7 May and 9 July 1937, 2 November 1938;

    Google Scholar 

  109. Enclosure 91A, 7 January 1938, PRO, WO 32/3663.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Although phosgene was considered as a useful charging for aircraft bombs. ‘Memorandum on the value of Phosgene as a charging in Air Force and Army Weapons’, CDRD report, 11 December 1939, PRO, AIR 2/8658.

    Google Scholar 

  111. 114 meeting of the T(reasury) I(nter) S(ervice) C(ommittee), 16 December 1937, PRO, T 161/1321.

    Google Scholar 

  112. 115 meeting of the TISC, 21 December 1937, PRO, T 161/1321.

    Google Scholar 

  113. ‘The Manufacture of Toxic Gas for Use in War’, CID Paper 1465-B, 26 July, 1938, PRO, CAB 4/28.

    Google Scholar 

  114. 175 and 201 meetings of the TISC, 21 October 1938 and 6 February 1939, PRO, T 161/1327 and T 161/1330. See also ‘Memorandum on the Position in the Event of an Early Gas Blitz’, 19 February 1941, Weir Mss, Churchill College, Cambridge, 20/16.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Anglo-French conversations on chemical warfare 1939’, PRO, WO 193/740.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Seventeenth report of the CDRD, 31 March 1937, PRO, WO 33/1484. See also Brown, Chemical Warfare, pp. 149–56.

    Google Scholar 

  117. H. L. Stimson, memorandum, 25 May 1932, FRUS (1932) vol. 1, p. 182.

    Google Scholar 

  118. ‘The Manufacture of Toxic gas for Use in War’, CID Paper 1465-B, 26 July 1938, PRO, CAB 4/28.

    Google Scholar 

  119. A. Chayes, ‘An Inquiry into the Workings of Arms Control Agreements’, Harvard Law Review, vol. 85, no. 5 (March 1972) p. 907;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. and J. P. Perry Robinson, ‘Chemical Arms Control and the Assimilation of Chemical Weapons’, International Journal, vol. XXXVI, no. 3 (Summer 1981) p. 520.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Edward M. Spiers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 1986 Edward M. Spiers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Spiers, E.M. (1986). The Failure of Disarmament. In: Chemical Warfare. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10454-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation