Advertisement

Colonization Among Cripples

  • Roger Cooter
Part of the Science, Technology and Medicine in Modern History book series (STMMH)

Abstract

To some extent, all professional agendas are set by circumstances outside the immediate control of the professionals involved. But some agendas are thus determined more than others, and this was especially so for orthopaedists in the increasingly cold economic climate of the postwar years. Despite gains in status during the war, the specialism lacked autonomy, and its practitioners were too few to constitute an effective lobby in medical politics. Whatever orthopaedists might have wanted to do, they were more or less directly constrained by their immediate socioeconomic and political context. In particular, they were bound by the social and ideological concerns of the agents and agencies through whom they were compelled to negotiate their interests. In more ways than one the postwar agenda was to be set for them, not by them.

Keywords

Local Authority Preventive Medicine National Scheme County Council Primary Health Centre 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 5.
    Josep Trueta, Gathorne Robert Girdlestone (Oxford, 1971), p. 31.Google Scholar
  2. 8.
    Daniel Fox, Health Policies, Health Politics: the British and American Experience, 1911–1965 (Princeton, 1986). As Charles Webster has shown, however, the tendency to ‘hierarchical regionalism’ was by no means universal nor inevitable: ‘Conflict and Consensus: explaining the British health service’, Twentieth Century British History, 1 (1990), pp. 121–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 17.
    Arthur Marwick, The Deluge: British society and the First World War (1965), pp. 240–1.Google Scholar
  4. 18.
    See Frank Honigsbaum, The Struggle for the Ministry of Health, 1914–1919 (1970).Google Scholar
  5. 25.
    In Sir James Marchant (ed.), The Claims of the Coming Generation (1923), pp. 15–36 at p. 35. See also Cripples’ J., 2 (Apr. 1926), p. 242.Google Scholar
  6. 46.
    Glasgow Children’s Hospital, 48th Annual Report for the Year Ending 1930. For similar, see George Newman, The Building of a Nation’s Health (1939), p. 226 andGoogle Scholar
  7. Alfred Tubby, The Advance of Orthopaedic Surgery (1924), p. 96.Google Scholar
  8. 52.
    Elizabeth Fee and Dorothy Porter, ‘Public Health, Preventive Medicine and Professionalization: England and America in the nineteenth century’, in Andrew Wear (ed.), Medicine in Society: historical essays (Cambridge, 1991), pp. 249–75. See also the essays inGoogle Scholar
  9. Elizabeth Fee and Roy M. Acheson (eds), A History of Education in Public Health (Oxford/ New York, 1991).Google Scholar
  10. 70.
    Cited in JBJS, 30B (1948), p. 202. For comparisons in the field of rheumatology, see David Cantor, ‘The Contradictions of Specialization: rheumatism and the decline of the spa in inter-war Britain’, in Roy Porter (ed.), The Medical History of Waters and Spas. Med. Hist., Suppl. No. 10 (1990), pp. 127–44.Google Scholar
  11. 76.
    D. P. Willard, JBJS, 17 (1935), p. 533.Google Scholar
  12. 89.
    Celia Petty, ‘Primary Research and Public Health: the prioritization of nutrition research in inter-war Britain’, in J. Austoker and L. Bryder (eds), Historical Perspectives on the Role of the MRC (Oxford, 1989), pp. 59–82. See alsoGoogle Scholar
  13. David Smith and Malcolm Nicolson, ‘The “Glasgow School” of Paton, Findlay and Cathcart: conservative thought in chemical physiology, nutrition and public health’, Social Stud. Sci., 19 (1989), pp. 195–238, andCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Naomi Aronson, ‘Nutrition as a Social Problem: a case study of entrepreneurial strategy in science’, Social Policy, 29 (1982), pp. 474–87.Google Scholar
  15. 106.
    See letters between Jones and Arthur Morely, Secretary of the RNOH, 10–24 October 1927, in the Girdlestone Papers, and John Cholmeley, History of the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (1985), pp. 118–20.Google Scholar
  16. 107.
    W. S. Baer, JBJS, 6 (1924), pp. 503–9 at p. 508.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Roger Cooter 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger Cooter
    • 1
  1. 1.Wellcome Unit for the History of MedicineUniversity of ManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations