Advertisement

Happenings by Accident

  • Roger Cooter
Part of the Science, Technology and Medicine in Modern History book series (STMMH)

Abstract

Like crippled children, accidents had to be brought into focus before professionalizing strategies could be articulated in their name. Unlike crippled children, however, the medical ‘discovery’ of accidents, which was roughly contemporaneous, was unrelated to any widespread humanitarian movement. While fatal and non-fatal accidents were prevalent in the Victorian period, and were perhaps on the increase,1 they were not much considered before the last decades of the century. Concern over factory reform in the 1830s and 1840s had generated the potent image of the child factory cripple, which helped pave the way for the regulation of child labour in factories and mines. But that agitation not only failed to direct attention to the adults who comprised the majority of accident victims, it served to deflect attention from them.2 During the mid-Victorian ‘age of equipoise’, injured workers were as out of mind as out of the sight of the ‘respectable’ middle classes. To the Manchester medical practitioner, John Roberton, writing in 1860, it appeared that ‘if “plague, pestilence, and famine” used to be the evils most feared in bygone times, contusions, fractures, dislocations, burns, and other kinds of injury may well be regarded as the dread of the present’, but with this crucial difference, that ‘whereas the plague and the pestilence were the terror of all ranks, the rich as well as the poor, the bodily injuries now so frequent are the lot mainly of the labouring classes’.3

Keywords

Ambulance Service London Hospital Accident Victim Charity Hospital Friendly Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    See John Rule, The Experience of Labour in Eighteenth-Century Industry (1981), p. 91.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    Benjamin Moore, The Dawn of the Health Age (1911). Similarly lacking reference to the victims of accidents is Sidney and Beatrice Webb’s The Prevention of Destitution (1911), andGoogle Scholar
  3. Lady Waldorf Astor’s The Health of the People (1917). Following suit, neitherGoogle Scholar
  4. F.B. Smith’s The People’s Health, 1830–1910 (1979) norGoogle Scholar
  5. Anthony Wohl’s Endangered Lives: public health in Victorian Britain (1983) contain sections on the adult victims of accidents.Google Scholar
  6. 12.
    Indeed, the staging of the debate over simple fractures was largely the result of efforts on the part of Harold Stiles and Victor Horsley. The debate gained Arbuthnot Lane the sympathy of the ‘younger men’ in British surgery. See W. E. Tanner, Sir W. Arbuthnot Lane: his life and work (1946), pp. 102–3, and BMA Annual Meeting, ‘Section of Surgery’, BMJ, 30 July 1910, p. 292. The first volume (1913) of Moynihan and Hey Groves’s British Journal of Surgery included a report of a surgical visit to Guy’s Hospital to witness Lane’s treatment of fractures in his ‘marvellously organised’ clinic (pp. 314–16).Google Scholar
  7. 13.
    R. Harris, ‘The Future of Orthopaedic Surgery’, the president’s address, 1948, JBJS, 30A (1948), p. 806.Google Scholar
  8. 21.
    Hilary Marland, Medicine and Society in Wakefield and Huddersfield, 1780–1870 (Cambridge, 1987), p. 130.Google Scholar
  9. 26.
    For an example of the traditional routine for fracture treatment at Guy’s Hospital, see T. B. Layton, Sir William Arbuthnot Lane: an enquiry into the mind and influence of a sturgeon (Edinburgh, 1956), pp. 21, 73; and, for St Bartholomew’s Hospital, see the letter of James Taylor, quoted inGoogle Scholar
  10. John West, The Taylors of Lancashire: bonesetters and doctors, 1750–1890 (Worsley, 1977), pp. 66–7.Google Scholar
  11. 33.
    See Seebohm Rowntree, Poverty, a study of town life (1900), p. 168.Google Scholar
  12. 34.
    W. C. Mallalieu, ‘Joseph Chamberlain and Workmen’s Compensation’, J. Econ. Hist., 10 (1950), pp. 45–57; andCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilbert Stone, A History of Labour (1921), pp. 367–84.Google Scholar
  14. 35.
    Peter Bartrip and S. B. Burman, The Wounded Soldiers of Industry: industrial compensation policy, 1833–1897 (Oxford, 1983), pp. 65 and 212ff.Google Scholar
  15. 36.
    See David Green, Working-Class Patients and the Medical Establishment: self-help in Britain from the mid-nineteenth century to 1948 (1985).Google Scholar
  16. 37.
    Ronnie Cole-Mackintosh, A Century of Service to Mankind: a history of the St. John Ambulance Brigade (1986), p. ix. See alsoGoogle Scholar
  17. Nigel Corbet-Fletcher, The St. John Ambulance Association, its history and its part in the ambulance movement (1929), andGoogle Scholar
  18. J. Clifford, For the Service of Mankind: Furley, Lechmere and Duncan, St. John Ambulance Founders (1971).Google Scholar
  19. 42.
    J. V. Pickstone, Medicine in Industrial Society: a history of hospital development in Manchester and its region, 1752–1946 (Manchester, 1985), p. 113.Google Scholar
  20. 44.
    Thomas Bickerton, Medical History of Liverpool (1936), p. 116.Google Scholar
  21. 46.
    John Poland, Records of the Miller Hospital and Royal Kent Dispensary (Greenwich, 1893), p. 258.Google Scholar
  22. 53.
    See, for example, Robert Bridges, ‘An Account of the Casualty Department’, St Barts Hosp. Repts., 14 (1878), pp. 167–82; andGoogle Scholar
  23. Bernard Cashman, Private Charity and the Public Purse: the development of Bedford General Hospital, 1794–1988 (Bedford, 1988), p. 145.Google Scholar
  24. 62.
    See M. Jeanne Peterson, The Medical Profession in Mid-Victorian London (Berkeley, 1978), pp. 175–6, andGoogle Scholar
  25. Adrian Forty, ‘The Modern Hospital in England and France: the social and medical uses of architecture’, in Anthony D. King (ed.), Buildings and Society (1980), pp. 61–93 at pp. 76–7. On the staffing of outpatient departments, see also the editorial in BMJ, 25 March 1893, pp. 649–50.Google Scholar
  26. 65.
    Lawson Tait, ‘Address in Surgery’, p. 271. He attributed these tendencies to the ovariotomist, Spencer Wells. The keeping of record cards was developed largely at the Massachusetts General Hospital in the 1900s. It became all the more necessary in contexts where there was no place for intimate doctor/patient relations and where routine work in specialist care might be delegated to several assistants. See S. J. Reiser, ‘Creating Form Out of Mass: the development of the medical record’, in E. Mendelsohn (ed.), Transformation and Tradition in the Sciences: essays in honor of I. Bernard Cohen (New York, 1984), pp. 301–16; Rosner, Hospitals and Health Care, pp. 55 et passim; andGoogle Scholar
  27. Joel Howell, ‘Machines and Medicine: technology transforms the American hospital’, in Diana Long and Janet Golden (eds), The American General Hospital: communities and social contexts (Ithaca, New York, 1989), pp. 109–34, esp. pp. 121ff. See alsoGoogle Scholar
  28. David Armstrong, ‘Space and Time in British General Practice’, in Margaret Lock and D. Gordon (eds), Biomedicine Examined (1973), pp. 207–25.Google Scholar
  29. 67.
    Quoted in S. E. Finer, The Life and Times of Sir Edwin Chadwick (1952), p. 93.Google Scholar
  30. 70.
    See Stephen Kern, The Culture of Time and Space, 1880–1918 (Cambridge, Mass., 1983);Google Scholar
  31. Ian R. Bartky, ‘The Adoption of Standard Time’, Technology and Culture, 30 (1989), pp. 25–56; and Schivelbusch, Railway Journey. See alsoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Robert H. Wiebe, The Search For Order, 1877–1920 (New York, 1967).Google Scholar
  33. 73.
    Geoffrey Rivett, The Development of the London Hospital System, 1823–1982 (1986), p. 133.Google Scholar
  34. 76.
    For America, see Charles Rosenberg, ‘Inward Vision and Outward Glance: the shaping of the American Hospital, 1880–1914’, Bull. Hist. Med., 53 (1979), pp. 346–91;PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Morris Vogel, ‘Managing Medicine: creating a profession of hospital administration in the United States, 1895–1915’, in Lindsay Granshaw and Roy Porter (eds), The Hospital in History (1989), pp. 243–60, esp. p. 246;Google Scholar
  36. Stephen J. Kunitz, ‘Efficiency and Reform in the Financing and Organization of American Medicine in the Progressive Era’, Bull. Hist. Med., 55 (1981), pp. 497–515;PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Susan Reverby, ‘Stealing the Golden Eggs: Ernest Armory Codman and the science and management of medicine’, Bull. Hist. Med., 55 (1981), pp. 156–71; idem, ‘A Legitimate Relationship: nursing, hospitals, and science in the twentieth century’, in Long and Golden (eds), American General Hospital, pp. 135–56; and idem, Ordered to Care: the dilemma of American nursing, 1850–1945 (New York, 1987), pp. 150ff. For a contemporary comment, see,PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. J. M. T. Finney, ‘The standardization of the surgeon’, JAMA, 63 (1914), pp. 1433–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 79.
    Christopher Maggs, A Century of Change: the story of the Royal National Pension Fund for Nurses (1988), of which Burdett was the founder. See also, Rivett, ‘Biographical notes on Sir Henry Burdett, 1847–1920’, in his London Hospital System, pp. 373–4. A full biography of Burdett is long overdue.Google Scholar
  40. 83.
    Frank Prochaska, Philanthropy and the Hospitals of London: the King’s Fund, 1897–1990 (Oxford, 1992), p. 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 86.
    Benjamin Vincent, Haydn’s Dictionary of Dates (16th edn, 1881), pp. 5–6.Google Scholar
  42. 95.
    See Dr P. Murray Braidwood, Hospital Ships (Hospitals’ Association pamphlet, c. 1885); andGoogle Scholar
  43. John Burne, ‘River Ambulance and Tramway’ in his Dartford’s Capital River: paddle steamers, personalities and smallpox boats (Buckingham, 1989), pp. 23–7.Google Scholar
  44. 98.
    See John Ellis, The Social History of the Machine Gun (1975);Google Scholar
  45. Anne Summers, Angels and Citizens: British women as military nurses, 1854–1914 (1988); and Schivelbusch, The Railway Journey. Google Scholar
  46. 100.
    See Sir Neil Cantlie, A History of the Army Medical Department, vol. 2 (1974), pp. 406–10. Knutsford was the director of the ambulance department of the Order of St John. See Furley, Autobiography, p. 284. As such he was probably responsible for the training in first aid that took place on the docks around the Poplar Hospital (see BMJ, 11 June 1881, p. 929). On Sieveking and the Association, see BMJ, 19 Nov. 1881.Google Scholar
  47. 105.
    Paul O’Brien, ‘Orthopaedic Service’, in J. J. Byrne (ed.), A History of the Boston City Hospital, 1905–1964 (Boston [1964]), pp. 227–31. See alsoGoogle Scholar
  48. K. E. Digby, ‘Note on Ambulances at Boston, Montreal and New York’ in Report of the Ambulance Committee, 1909, vol. I, Appendix viii, pp. 107–9.Google Scholar
  49. 110.
    F. Watson, The Life of Sir Robert Jones (1934), ch. 4.Google Scholar
  50. 112.
    Terry Coleman, Railway Navvies: a history of the men who made the railways (Harmondsworth, 1968), pp. 73–4.Google Scholar
  51. 113.
    See Raymond Munts, Bargaining for Health: labour unions, health insurance, and medical care (Madison, Wisconsin, 1967); andGoogle Scholar
  52. Paul Starr, The Social Transformation of American Medicine (New York, 1982), pp. 201f. Similar circumstances at the railway works at Crewe led to the erection there in 1899 of a small company hospital (see below Ch. 10). Other prewar examples of company hospitals in Britain are rare.Google Scholar
  53. 117.
    Cited in B. T. Leech, History of the Manchester Ship Canal (Manchester, 1907), vol. 2, pp. 142–3. Considerably lower figures were stated by the secretary of the Ship Canal Company in 1892. Cited inGoogle Scholar
  54. David Owen, The Manchester Ship Canal (Manchester, 1983), pp. 91–2.Google Scholar
  55. 120.
    E. J. Hobsbawm, ‘Custom, Wages and Work-load in Nineteenth-century Industry’, in his Labouring Men: studies in the history of labour (1968), pp. 344–70, at p. 345. Anson Rabinbach has observed that ‘By 1870, especially in England, the wasteful expenditure of energy, particularly in the form of labor power, became a source of grave national concern. The increasing costs of labor power resulting from the impact of trade union agitation and a general rise in the working-class standard of living contributed to this concern. Even more important was the recognition that the costs of reproducing labor power could be turned into profit, and the working class constituted a potentially lucrative domestic market, particularly during the years of prosperity after 1871.’ ‘The Body without Fatigue: a nineteenth-century Utopia’, in Seymour Drescher et al. (eds), Political Symbolism in Modern Europe (New Brunswick, NJ, 1982), pp. 42–62 at p. 50.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Roger Cooter 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger Cooter
    • 1
  1. 1.Wellcome Unit for the History of MedicineUniversity of ManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations