Advertisement

Taking Ukraine Seriously: Western and Russian Responses to the Orange Revolution

  • Derek Fraser

Abstract

The Orange Revolution—that mass popular protest at the end of 2004 against vote rigging in the first two rounds of the Ukrainian presidential election—resulted in a largely fair third round of voting that brought to power the reformist coalition under President Yushchenko. The reformers made Ukraine a more democratic and, possibly, a more independent country. Much still has to be done, however, to realize fully the reformers’ goals of assuring Ukraine’s independence, achieving European standards of governance and economic freedom, and anchoring the country to Western institutions such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), the European Union, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). This chapter will examine what the reformers achieved and what remains to be done. It will also consider Russia’s efforts to regain its influence and power in Ukraine and the role that the West might play to support reform.

Keywords

Prime Minister World Trade Organization Presidential Election Economic Freedom Corruption Perception Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Taras Kuzio, “Revisiting the Orange Revolution, Considerable Gains Made,” Eurasia Daily Monitor (Washington, DC), vol. 2, issue 217, November 21, 2005.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    James Sherr, “The New Coordinates of Ukrainian Politics,” Nezavisimaia gazeta (Moscow), April 10, 2006.Google Scholar
  3. 10.
    See Andrey Zorin, “Why We Don’t Like Ukraine” Kommersant (Moscow), January 25, 2006.Google Scholar
  4. 11.
    Taras Kuzio, “Russia still gets it wrong in Ukraine,” Eurasian Daily Monitor (Washington, DC), vol. 2, issue 185, October 5, 2005.Google Scholar
  5. 12.
    Varvara Zhluktenko, “Pundit says Putin’s remarks on Ukraine counterproductive,” Den (Kyiv), April 13, 2005, pp. 1, 3;Google Scholar
  6. Taras Kuzio, “Ukraine asks Russia to begin preparations for withdrawing Black Sea Fleet,” Eurasia Daily Monitor (Washington, DC), vol. 2, issue 77, April 20, 2005.Google Scholar
  7. 13.
    Aleksandr Palii, “Our Answer to Chernomyrdin” (in Russian), Ukrainska pravda (Kyiv), February 20, 2006.Google Scholar
  8. 15.
    Andrew Wilson, Ukraine’s Orange Revolution ( New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2005 ), 118–21.Google Scholar
  9. 19.
    Dmitrii Trenin, “The Post-Imperial Project,” Nezavisimaia gazeta (Moscow), February 15, 2006.Google Scholar
  10. 20.
    Dmitrii Trenin, Reading Russia Right, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (Moscow), Special Edition 42, October 2005.Google Scholar
  11. 23.
    Gleb Pavlovskii, “Ukrainian Export of Spokes in Wheels,” Izvestiia (Moscow), January 24, 2006.Google Scholar
  12. 24.
    Yuri Zarakhovich, “Qamp;A: Putin’s Critical Adviser,” Time.com (New York) December 31, 2005.Google Scholar
  13. 25.
    Sergei Ivanov, “Russia Must Be Strong,” Wall Street Journal (New York), January 11, 2006, p. A14.Google Scholar
  14. 26.
    Masha Lipman, “Risking Another Slavic War,” Washington Post (Washington, DC), January 30, 2006.Google Scholar
  15. 27.
    Vladimir Socor, “Putin on Kosovo and Post-Soviet Conflicts— Destructive Ambiguity,” Eurasian Daily Monitor (Washington, DC), February 2, 2006, pp. 3, 23;Google Scholar
  16. Vladimir Socor, “Moscow on Kosovo: Having Its Cake and Eating It Too,” Eurasian Daily Monitor (Washington, DC), February 6, 2006, pp. 3, 25.Google Scholar
  17. 28.
    Dmitrii Trenin, “The Post-Imperial Project,” Nezavisimaia gazeta (Moscow), February 15, 2006.Google Scholar
  18. 31.
    Eberhard Schneider, “Ukraine and the European Union,” Ukraine-Analysen 5, April 11, 2006.Google Scholar
  19. 33.
    James Sherr, “Ukraine’s Scissors: Between Internal Weakness and External Dependence,” in Russie.Nei.Visions 2006: Understanding Russia and the New Independent States, ed. Thomas Gomart and Tatiana Kastueva-Jean (Paris: Institut français de relations internationales [IFRI], 2006 ).Google Scholar
  20. 36.
    James Sherr, “Ukraine Prospects and Risks,” Action Ukraine Report 780, October 25, 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Oliver Schmidtke and Serhy Yekelchyk, eds. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Derek Fraser

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations