Bushwhacking the Democratic Peace

  • Bruce Russett
Part of the Advances in Foreign Policy Analysis book series (AFPA)


President George W. Bush concluded his final 2004 debate with John Kerry by declaring his faith in “the ability of liberty to transform societies, to convert a hostile world to a peaceful world.” Such affirmations then became part of his rhetorical repertoire, as in his 2005 State of the Union address and his claims about building democracy in the Middle East as a result of his invasion of Iraq. For example, “By now it should be clear that decades of excusing and accommodating tyranny in the pursuit of stability have only led to instability and tragedy … It should be clear that the advance of democracy leads to peace, because governments that respect the rights of their people also respect the rights of their neighbors.”1


Global Community Democratic Government Democratic State Military Intervention Democratic Transition 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 3.
    Fred Chernoff, “The Study of Democratic Peace and Progress in International Relations,” International Studies Review 6 (March 2004), 49–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. David Kinsella, “No Rest for the Democratic Peace,” American Political Science Review 89 (August 2005), 453–57.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Bruce Russett, Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993), 135–36Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Lawrence Freedman, The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy (New York: St. Martin’s, 1989, 2nd edition), 126–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 6.
    Robert Pape, Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism (New York: Random House, 2005)Google Scholar
  6. 15.
    Harald Mueller, “The Antimony of Democratic Peace,” International Politics 41 (December 2004), 494–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 17.
    David Dallek, Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy 1932–1945 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1979), 285.Google Scholar
  8. 18.
    Samuel P. Huntington, The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991)Google Scholar
  9. 20.
    Larry Diamond, “What Went Wrong in Iraq?” Foreign Affairs 83 (October 2004), 34–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 21.
    Thomas Carothers, Aiding Democracy Abroad: The Learning Curve (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1999), 351.Google Scholar
  11. 23.
    Mark Peceny, Democracy at the Point of Bayonets (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
  12. 24.
    Mark Peceny and J. Pickering, “Forging Democracy at Gunpoint” (Manuscript, Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico, 2004).Google Scholar
  13. 33.
    Katherine Sikkink, “Human Rights, Principled Issue-Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America,” International Organization 47 (Summer 1993), 411–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 35.
    G. John Ikenberry, After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
  15. 36.
    David Phillips, “Turkey’s Dreams of Accession,” Foreign Affairs 83 (October 2004), 86–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 39.
    Charles Lipson, Reliable Partners: How Democracies Have Made a Separate Peace (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
  17. 41.
    Oona Hathaway, “Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?” Yale Law Journal 111 (June 2002), 1935–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 45.
    Yi Feng, Democracy, Governance, and Economic Performance: Theory and Evidence (Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press, 2004)Google Scholar
  19. 46.
    Adam Przeworski, Michael Alvarez, Jose Cheibub, and Fernando Limongi, Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 47.
    Lars-Erik Cederman, “Back to Kant: Reinterpreting the Democratic Peace as a Macrohistorical Learning Process,” American Political Science Review 95 (March 2001), 15–31Google Scholar
  21. 48.
    Benjamin Fordham and Thomas Walker, “Kantian Liberalism, Regime Type, and Military Resource Allocation,” International Studies Quarterly 49 (March 2005), 141–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 49.
    Zeev Maoz, Domestic Sources of Global Change (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996)Google Scholar
  23. 50.
    Francis Fukuyama, America at the Crossroads (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bruce Russett 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce Russett

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations