Advertisement

Australian Responses to Increases in Unemployment and Wage Inequality: Comparisons with the United Kingdom, New Zealand and the United States

  • Robert G. Gregory
Part of the International Economic Association Series book series (IEA)

Abstract

Over the last 25 years three facts have dominated much of the discussion of the macro labour market in the United States (US): constant or falling average real wages, the large increase in wage inequality, and strong employment growth. These three facts, tied together by simple models of labour demand and supply, have had a profound effect on labour market policy in some English-speaking countries which have experienced slow employment growth and high unemployment rates since 1975. Policy in these countries - Australia, United Kingdom (UK) and New Zealand (NZ) - has been strongly influenced by the idea that to achieve faster employment growth for the young and unskilled it is necessary to move towards a US-style less regulated labour market which is capable of generating slower real wage growth, greater wage inequality and more jobs. Hence the UK introduced a number of labour market reforms during the early Thatcher years (Schmitt (1995)). Australia began to deregulate the labour market from 1989 and is continuing down this path. NZ introduced large-scale reforms under the Employments Contracts Act 1991 (Maloney (1997), Silverstone et al. (1996)).

Keywords

Labour Market Real Wage Employment Growth Wage Inequality Relative Wage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beer, G. (1997) ‘Is It Worth Working? The Financial Impact of Increased Hours of Work by Married Mothers with Young Children’ (paper presented at the 26th Annual Conference of Economists, University of Tasmania, 28 September-1 October).Google Scholar
  2. Dixon, S. (1998) ‘Growth in the Dispersion of Earnings: 1984–97’, Labour Market Bulletin, vols 1 and 2, pp. 71–107.Google Scholar
  3. Gregory, R. G. (2000) ‘The Impact of Labour-Market and Economic Reforms in the UK, NZ and the US’, in S. Bell (ed.). The Unemployment Crisis in Australia (Melbourne: Cambridge University Press), pp. 105–25.Google Scholar
  4. Gregory, R. G. E. Klug and Y. Martin (1999) ‘Labour Market Deregulation, Relative Wages and the Social Security System’, in S. Richardson (ed.). Reshaping the Labour Market: Regulation, Efficiency and Equality in Australia (Melbourne: Cambridge University Press), pp. 200–22.Google Scholar
  5. Maloney, T. (1997) ‘Has New Zealand’s Employment Contracts Act Increased Employment and Reduced Wages?’, Australian Economic Papers, vol. 36, no. 69 (December), pp. 243–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Martin, Y. M. (1999) ‘The Economic Survival of Indigenous Mothers in a Changing Labour Market’ (PhD Dissertation), ANU (July).Google Scholar
  7. OECD (1993) ‘Earnings Inequality: Changes in the 1980s’, OECD Employment Outlook (July), pp. 157–84.Google Scholar
  8. Schmitt, J. (1995) ‘The Changing Structure of Male Earnings in Britain, 1974–1988’, in R. Freeman and L. Katz (eds). Differences and Changes in Wages Structures (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  9. Silverstone, B., A. Bollard and R. Lattimore (eds) (1996) A Study of Economic Reform: The Case of New Zealand (Amsterdam: North-Holland).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Economic Association 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert G. Gregory
    • 1
  1. 1.Research School of Social SciencesAustralian National UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations