Advertisement

Recent Psychological Approaches with Some Questions about the Abuse of Children

  • Jack Zipes

Abstract

The bicentennial celebrations of the birthdays of the Brothers Grimm have long since come to an end, and it is time to take stock. Did we really learn something new about the Grimms and their tales during those two years of celebrations and commemorations held fifteen years ago? Or did we honor the Grimms merely by praising them in a conventional and uncritical manner, and did we thereby do them a disservice? Who did the praising and why? This last question is most significant, for numerous associations, institutions, and nations organized ceremonial conferences and symposiums to honor the Grimms, or published books and articles about their significance. Such widespread tribute to the Grimms and their work certainly indicated to what extent the Grimms, and their tales in particular, have transcended German culture to become vital components in the cultural heritages of different nations. In fact, one could probably argue that the Grimms’ tales, either in their literally translated editions or in multifarious adaptations, and especially in their mass-mediated forms by Disney and other cinematic corporations, play a crucial role in the socialization of children throughout much of the modern world.

Keywords

Child Abuse Apple Tree Literary Critic Fairy Tale Folk Tale 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Dieter Hennig and Bernhard Lauer, eds., Die Brüder Grimm: Dokumente ihres Lebens und Wirkens (Kassel: Weber & Weidemeyer, 1985).Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Ingrid Koszinowski and Vera Leuschner, eds., Ludwig Emil Grimm 1790–1863: Maler, Zeichner, Radierer (Kassel: Weber & Weidemeyer, 1985).Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Hans Bernd Harder and Ekkehard Kaufmann, eds., Die Brüder Grimm in ihrer amtlichen und politischen Tätigkeit (Kassel: Weber & Weidemeyer, 1985).Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    Wilhelm Solms, ed., Das selbstverständliche Wunder: Beiträge germanistischer Märchenforschung (Marburg: Hitzroth, 1986).Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    Irma Hildebrandt, Es waren ihrer Fünf: Die Brüder Grimm und ihre Familie (Cologne: Diederichs, 1984).Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    Gabriele Seitz, Die Brüder Grimm: Leben—Werk—Zeit (Munich: Winkler, 1984).Google Scholar
  7. 10.
    Ludwig Denecke, ed., Brüder Grimm Gedenken 6 und 7, vol. 6 (Marburg: Elwert, 1986) and vol. 7 (Marburg: Elwert, 1987).Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    Heinz Rölleke, “Wo das Wünschen noch geholfen haf”: Gesammelte Aufsätze zu den “Kinder- und Hausmärchen” der Brüder Grimm (Bonn: Bouvier, 1985).Google Scholar
  9. 12.
    Heinz Rölleke, Die Märchen der Brüder Grimm (Munich: Artemis, 1985).Google Scholar
  10. 13.
    Heinz Rölleke, ed., Kleine Ausgabe (Frankfurt am Main: Insel, 1985).Google Scholar
  11. 14.
    Heinz Rölleke and Ulrike Marquardt, eds., Kinder- und Hausmärchen Gesammelt durch die Brüder Grimm: Vergrösserter Nachdruck der zweibändigen Erstausgabe von 1812 und 1815 nach dem Handexemplar des Brüder Grimm-Museums Kassel mit sämtlichen handschriftlichen Korrekturen und Nachträgen der Brüder Grimm sowie einem Ergänzungsheft (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1986).Google Scholar
  12. 15.
    Albert Schindehütte, ed., Krauses Grimm’sche Märchen, preface by Heinz Rölleke (Kassel: Stauda, 1985).Google Scholar
  13. 16.
    Verena Kast, Wege aus Angst und Symbiose: Märchen psychologisch gedeutet (Olten, Switzerland: Walter, 1982); Through Emotions to Maturity: Psychological Readings of Fairy Tales, trans. Douglas Whitcher (New York: Fromm International, 1993).Google Scholar
  14. 17.
    Eugen Drewermann, Das Mädchen ohne Hände (Freiburg: Olten, 1981).Google Scholar
  15. 18.
    Eugen Drewermann, Schneeweißchen und Rosenrot (Freiburg: Olten, 1983).Google Scholar
  16. 19.
    Eugen Drewermann, Die kluge Else, Rapunzel (Freiburg: Olten, 1986).Google Scholar
  17. 20.
    Hildegunde Wöller, Aschenputtel: Energie der Liebe (Stuttgart: Kreuz, 1984).Google Scholar
  18. 21.
    Lutz Müller, Das tapfere Schneiderlein: List als Lebenskunst (Stuttgart: Kreuz, 1985).Google Scholar
  19. 22.
    Hans Jellouschek, Der Froschkönig: Geschichte einer Beziehung (Stuttgart: Kreuz, 1985).Google Scholar
  20. 23.
    Ursula Eschenbach, Hänsel und Gretel: Der Sohn im mütterlichen Dunkel (Stuttgart: Kreuz, 1986).Google Scholar
  21. 24.
    Carl Mallet, Kopf Ab! Gewalt im Märchen (Hamburg: Rasch und Röhring, 1985).Google Scholar
  22. 25.
    Elisabeth Müller, Das Bild der Frau im Märchen: Analysen und erzieherische Betrachtungen (Munich: Profil, 1986).Google Scholar
  23. 26.
    Sigrid Früh and Rainer Wehse, eds., Die Frau im Märchen (Kassel: Röth, 1985).Google Scholar
  24. 28.
    Helga Gebert, ed., Alte Märchen der Brüder Grimm (Weinheim: Beltz & Gelberg, 1985).Google Scholar
  25. 29.
    Uta Claus and Rolf Kutschera, Total Tote Hose: 12 Bockstarke Märchen (Frankfurt am Main: Eichborn, 1984).Google Scholar
  26. 30.
    Heinz Langer, Grimmige Märchen (Munich: Hugendubel, 1984).Google Scholar
  27. 31.
    Chris Schrauff, Der Wolf und seine Steine (Hannover: SOAK-Verlag, 1986).Google Scholar
  28. 32.
    Cf. Christa Bürger, “Die soziale Funktion volkstümlicher Erzählformen— Sage und Märchen,” in Projekt Deutschunterricht 1, ed. Heinz Ide (Stuttgart: Metzler, 1971), 26–56;Google Scholar
  29. Bernd Wollenweber, “Märchen und Sprichwort,” in Projektunterricht 6, ed. Heinz Ide (Stuttgart: Metzler, 1974): 12–92;Google Scholar
  30. Dieter Richter and Johannes Merkel, Märchen, Phantasie und soziales Lernen (Berlin: Basis, 1974).Google Scholar
  31. 33.
    See Werner Ogris, “Jacob Grimm und die Rechtsgeschichte,” in Jacob und Wilhelm Grimm (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1986), 67–96.Google Scholar
  32. 35.
    Cf. Rudolf Freudenberg, “Erzähltechnik und ‘Märchenton’” in Das selbstverständliche Wunder: Beiträge germanistischer Märchenforschung, ed. Wilhelm Solms (Marburg: Hitzeroh, 1986), 121–142;Google Scholar
  33. and Wolfgang Mieder, “Sprichwörtliche Schwundformen des Märchens. Zum 200. Geburtstag der Brüder Grimm,” Proverbium 3 (1986): 257–272.Google Scholar
  34. 39.
    Dieter Arendt, “Dümmlinge, Däumlinge und Diebe im Märchen—oder: ‘drei Söhne, davon hieß der Jüngste der Dümmling’ (KHM 64),” Diskussion Deutsch 91 (October 1986): 465–478.Google Scholar
  35. 40.
    Gertrud Jungblut, “Märchen der Brüder Grimm—Feministisch gelesen,” Diskussion Deutsch 91 (October 1986): 497–510.Google Scholar
  36. 41.
    Heide Göttner-Abendroth, Die Göttin und ihr Heros (Munich: Frauenoffensive, 1980).Google Scholar
  37. 45.
    Cf. Jack Zipes, The Trials and Tribulations of Little Red Riding Hood (South Hadley: Bergin & Garvey, 1983).Google Scholar
  38. 48.
    See Alice Miller, Du sollst nicht merken: Variationen über das Paradies-Thema (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1983), 294–300.Google Scholar
  39. 50.
    Alice Miller, The Drama of the Gifted Child, trans. Ruth Ward (New York: Basic Books, 1981), 27.Google Scholar
  40. 53.
    C. Alan Dundes, Life Is Like a Chicken Coop Ladder: A Portrait of German Culture Through Folklore (New York: Columbia University Press, 1984). Dundes tries to explain some aspects of the German national character by understanding the German interest in anal practices and products as expressed in proverbs, slang, and folk customs. “I believe Mayhew was on the right track and that he correctly anticipated psychoanalytic theory which postulates a connection or correlation between infant care and adult personality. The continued use of the German expression ‘Der ist falsch gewickelt’ (He was swaddled wrongly) suggesting that a misguided individual was damaged as an infant through poor child care hints that the folk themselves may have sensed the connection between infant care and adult personality. One might suppose, for example, that the important twentieth-century German notion of Lebensraum (living space) might reflect something more than political history or the particularities of the personality of Hitler. Lebensraum may conceivably go back to the painful discomfort of severe swaddling techniques. As an infant seeks more ‘living space,’ so adults in the same culture might find great appeal in a concept that offered the nation (and its citizens) a chance to move around and spread out,” 101–102. Though overstated, Dundes’s thesis is worth pursuing, since there may indeed be a connection between swaddling and the raising of children in Germany and the depiction of abuse and cruel treatment of children in the Grimms’ tales and also in children’s books like the famous Struwwelpeter (1845), or in Hans Christian Andersen’s fairy tales that began appearing in 1835.Google Scholar
  41. 54.
    Alan Dundes, “The Psychoanalytic Study of the Grimms’ Tales with Special Reference to ‘The Maiden Without Hands’ (AT 706),” Germanic Review 42 (Spring, 1987): 54.Google Scholar
  42. 55.
    Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm, The Complete Fairy Tales of the Brothers Grimm, trans. and ed. Jack Zipes (New York: Bantam, 1987), 120.Google Scholar
  43. 57.
    Walter Killy, ed., Kinder- und Hausmärchen in der ersten Gestalt (Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1962), 91.Google Scholar
  44. 58.
    Cf. Jeffrey M. Masson, Assault on Truth: Freud’s Suppression of the Seduction Theory (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1984).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jack Zipes 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jack Zipes

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations