Nizami’s Unlikely Heroines: A Study of the Characterizations of Women in Classical Persian Literature

  • Kamran Talattof

Abstract

Women are featured in the works of three major classical Persian poets, Nizami Ganjavi (1140–1202), Abul al-Qasim Firdawsi (932–1020), and Abd al-Rahman Jami (1414–92). These poets’ portrayals of their female characters vary considerably; however, because all three have written love stories, it is possible to compare them. Certain stories are common to at least two of these authors. Their stories include common characters, often based on historical figures. Moreover, Nizami was inspired by Firdawsi in a significant way and refers to his work, while Jami was inspired by Nizami and refers to him. Perhaps for these reasons, prominent scholars of classical Persian literature, including Meisami, Bürgel, and Moayyad, have compared some of these female characters. The existing literature on the topic, however, does not provide reasons for such diverse characterizations, but merely offers engaging descriptive analyses. This comparative study of the portrayals of women will seek to clarify the ambiguity surrounding the ideological and literary positions of these poets to explain the diversity in their presentations of the female. Such clarification carries broad significance, for in postrevolutionary Iran, the interpretation of these poets’ works has become the subject of intense debate among cultural and literary critics, many of whom are widely divided over Islamic discourse and state ideology.

Keywords

Egypt Heroine Clarification Metaphor Verse 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Ali Akbar Sa’idi Sirjani, Sima-yi du zan: shirin va layli [Layla] dar khamsah-i nizami ganjavi (Tehran: Nashr-i Naw Avaran, 1991).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bihruz Sarvatiyan, A’inah-i ghayb, nizami ganjah-’i dar masnavi makhzan al-asrar (Tehran: Nashr-i Kalamih, 1989), 37, 40.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bihruz Sarvatiyan, ed. Makhzan al-asrar-i nizami, Makhzan al-asrar / ba muqabilah-’i davazdah nuskhah, tashih va ta’liqat hamrah ba vazhah va amsal va hikam (Tehran: Tus, 1984), 283.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jalal Matini, “Azadigi va Tasahul-i Nizami Ganjavi,” in Iran-Shinasi, 4,1 (Spring 1992), 1–20.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fatamah Alaqih, “Sima-yi zan az didgah-i Nizami,” in Farhang 10 (Fall 1992), 317–30.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Julie S. Meisami, “Kings and Lovers: Ethical Dimensions of Medieval Persian Romance,” in Edebiyat 1 n. 1 (1987), 7.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. C. Bürgel offers a comparison of romance writing in the work of Gorgani, Nizami, Amir Khosrow Dehlavi, Jami, and others. See J. C. Bürgel, “The Romance,” in E. Yarshater, Persian Literature (New York: Bibliotheca Persica, 1987), 161–79 and “Die Frau als Persien in der Epik Nizamis,” Asiatische Studien 42: 137–55.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    For a treatment of this text as a work of drama, see Peter Chelkowski, “Nizami: Master Dramatist,” in E. Yarshater, Persian Literature (New York: Bibliotheca Persica, 1987), 190–213.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abd al-Majid Ayati, Dastan-i khusraw va shirin; surudah-i nizami (Tehran: Shirkat Kitabhay-i Jibi, 1974), 27–29.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    For a recent translation of Haft Paykar in English, see Nizami Ganjavi, The Haft Paykar: A Medieval Persian Romance, translated with an Introduction and Notes by Julie Scott Meisami. See also G. E. Wilson’s translation of The Haft Paykar (The Seven Beauties), (London: Late Probsthain and Company, 1924).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Elements such as colors, numbers, and weekdays play important roles in this book and indicate Nizami’s awareness of some of the sciences of his time. See Meisami, The Haft Paykar: A Medieval Persian Romance and Georg Krotkoff, “Colour and Number in the Haft Paykar,” in Logos Islamikos: Studia Islamica, ed. by Roger M. Savory and Dionisius A. Agius (Toronto, Canada: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1984).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peter Chelkowski argues that Puccini’s Turandot is very likely rooted in an Iranian original and in Nizami’s Haft Paykar. See “Āyā uprā-yi turāndut-i Puchini Bar Asas-i Kushk-i Surkh-i Haft PaykarA Nizami Ast?,” in Iran-Shinasi vol. 3, no. 4 (Winter 1991), 714–22.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nizami, Haft Paykar, ed. Dastgirdi (Tehran: Ibn-i Sina, 1955), 233.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    See Muhammad Taqi Jafari, Hikmat, Irfan, va Akhlaq dar Shir-i Nizami Ganjavi (Tehran: Intisharat-I Kayhan, 1991) and Bihruz Sarvatiyan, A’inah-i ghayb, nizami ganjah-’i dar masnavi makhzan al-asrar (Tehran: Nashr-i Kalamih, 1989), 37, 40.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nizami, Haft Paykar, ed. Dastgirdī (Tehran: Ibn-i Sina, 1955).Google Scholar
  19. 21.
    Julie S. Meisami, “Fitnah or Azadah? Nizami’s Ethical Poetic,” in Edebiyat N. S. vol. I, no. 2, 1989, 41–77.Google Scholar
  20. 22.
    Julie Scott Meisami, Medieval Persian Court Poetry (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 23.
    For a more detailed discussion of Layli’s character, see A. A. Sa’idi Sirjani, Sima-yi du zan (Tehran: Nashr-i Naw, 1989), 24.Google Scholar
  22. 24.
    Barat Zanjani, Layli va majnun-i nizami ganjai (Tehran: Tehran University Press, 1990), 113.Google Scholar
  23. 25.
    Jan Rypka, History of Iranian Literature (Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1968), 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 27.
    Arjang Maddi, “Bar rasi-i suvar-i khiyal dar haft paykar,” Farhang, 10 (Fall 1992), 331–408.Google Scholar
  25. 28.
    See J. C. Bürgel, “The Romance,” in E. Yarshater, Persian Literature (New York: Bibliotheca Persica, 1987), 161–79.Google Scholar
  26. 30.
    Hamid Dabashi, “Harf-i Nakhostin: Mafhum-i Sokhan dar Nazd-i Hakim Nizami Ganjavi,” in Iranshenasi vol. III, no. 4 (Winter 1992), 723–40.Google Scholar
  27. 31.
    Ibid., 733.Google Scholar
  28. 32.
    Sabatino Moscati, The Face of the Ancient Orient (Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1951), 111.Google Scholar
  29. 33.
    Jalil Dustkhah, Avesta (Tehran: Murvarid, 1983), 9.Google Scholar
  30. 35.
    Nizami Ganjavi, Kulliyat-i khamseh-i hakim nizami ganjah-i, ed. Dastgirdī, fourth edition (Tehran: Amir Kabir, 1987), 23.Google Scholar
  31. 43.
    Shahrukh Miskub, Milliyat va zaban (Tehran: Karavan, 1989), 23.Google Scholar
  32. 44.
    For more information on the genre of the epic, see C. M. Bowra, Heroic Poetry (London: Macmillan; New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1961).Google Scholar
  33. 45.
    Julie S. Meisami, “Fitnah or Azadah? Nizami’s Ethical Poetic,” in Edebiyat, 1, n. 2 (1989), 44.Google Scholar
  34. 46.
    For English translations of Firdwasi’s work (in part), see Firdawsi, The Epic of the Kings: Shah-nama, the National Epic of Persia, translated by Reuben Levy (London: Routledge & K. Paul, 1967); Firdawsi, The Legend of Seyavash, translated with an introduction and notes by Dick Davis (London; New York: Penguin, 1992); Firdawsi, The Tragedy of Sohrab and Rostam: From the Persian National Epic, The Shahname of Abol-Qasem Ferdowsi, translated by Jerome W. Clinton (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1996); In the Dragon’s Claws: The Story of Rostam and Esfandiyar, translated by Jerome W. Clinton (Washington, DC: Mage Books, 2000). And for information about this work, see E. G. Browne, A Literary History of Persia, 2 vols.; J. Rypka et al., History of Iranian Literature (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1968); Dick Davis, Epic and Sedition: The Case of Ferdowsi’s Shahnameh (Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press, 1992); Olga M. Davidson, Poet and Hero in the Persian Book of Kings (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  35. 47.
    Firdawsi, Abu al-Qasim, “Rostam va Sohrab,” Shahnameh, ed. M. A. Furughi (Tehran: Intisharat-i Javidan, n.d.), 83–98.Google Scholar
  36. 48.
    See M. Islami-Nudushan, “Mardan va Zanan-i Shahnamah,” in Nasir Hariri, ed. Firdawsi, zan, va tirazhidi (Babul, Iran: Kitabsara-yi Babul, 1986).Google Scholar
  37. 49.
    Julie S. Meisami, “Fitnah or Azadah? Nizami’s Ethical Poetic,” in Edebiyat N. S. vol. I, n. 2, (1989), 46.Google Scholar
  38. 50.
    Ibid., 63.Google Scholar
  39. 52.
    For more information, see Parvin Shakiba, Shi’r-i farsi az aghaz ta imruz (Tehran: Hirmand, 1992) and Nigahi guzara bar vizhagiha va digarguniha-yi shi’r-i farsi (Piedmont, CA: Shirikat-i Kitab-i Jahan and Iran Zamin, 1987).Google Scholar
  40. 53.
    Peter Jackson, ed. The Cambridge History of Iran, vol. 6, The Timurid and Safavid Periods (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), 913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 54.
    Shannon Caroline Stack, Herat: A Political and Social Study Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angles, 1975, 241.Google Scholar
  42. 55.
    Terry Allen, Timurid Herat (Wiesbaden: LRV, 1983), 15.Google Scholar
  43. 57.
    Abd al-Rahman Jami, Masnavi-i Haft Awrang, ed. M. Mudarris Gilani (Tehran: Sa’di, 1958), 331; Salaman va Absal, edited and introduced by Muhammad Rawshan (Tehran: Asatir, 1994), 118.Google Scholar
  44. 58.
    Ibid., 341.Google Scholar
  45. 59.
    Jami, Salaman and Absal, trans. Edward Fitzgerald, edited and with a literal prose translation by A. J. Arberry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1956), 174–75.Google Scholar
  46. 63.
    J. C. Bürgel, “The Romance,” in Persian Literature, no. 3, Ehsan Yarshater, ed. (New York: Bibliotheca Persica, 1988), pp. 175–77. See also note number 7.Google Scholar
  47. 64.
    Hadland F. Davis, Wisdom of the East: The Persian Mystics, Jami (London: John Murry, 1908), 23.Google Scholar
  48. 65.
    For more information on women in Islam see, Amina Wadud, Qur’an and Woman: Rereading the Sacred Text From a Woman’s Perspective (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999); Anwar Hekmat, Women and the Koran: The Status of Women in Islam (Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 1997); Haiden Moghissi, Feminism and Islamic Fundamentalism: The Limits of Postmodern Analysis (London; New York: Zed Books, 1999); Fatima Mernissi, Women and Islam: An Historical and Theological Enquiry. Trans. Mary Jo Lakeland (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991); and M. E. Combs-Schilling, Sacred Performances: Islam, Sexuality, and Sacrifice (New York: Columbia University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
  49. 66.
    Fatima Mernissi, Women and Islam: An Historical and Theological Enquiry. Trans. Mary Jo Lakeland (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991), viii, 126, and 128.Google Scholar
  50. 67.
    Abd al-Rahman, Jami, Silsalat-al-zahab (Golden Chain) in the collection Masnavi-i Haft Awrang (Tehran: Kitabfurushi-i Sa’di, 1972).Google Scholar
  51. 68.
    Gulam Husayn Yusufi, Chishmih-yi rowshan (Tehran: Ilmi, 1970), 269–78.Google Scholar
  52. 69.
    Abdelwahab Bouhdiba, Sexuality in Islam (London: Saqi Books, 1998), 30.Google Scholar
  53. 70.
    J. W. Wright, Jr. and Everett K. Rowson, Homoeroticism in Classical Arabic Literature (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997), xv.Google Scholar
  54. 71.
    Ibid., xv and 3.Google Scholar
  55. 73.
    Gayane Karen Merguerian and Afsaneh Najmabadi, “Zolaykha and Yusof: Whose ‘Best Story’?” International Journal of Middle East Studies, 29, no. 4 (November 1997), 485–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kamran Talattof and Jerome W. Clinton 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kamran Talattof

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations