Advertisement

Cultural Convergence: The Equine Connection between Muscovy and Europe

  • Ann M. Kleimola
Part of the Early Modern Cultural Studies book series (EMCSS)

Abstract

Is Russia Europe? The question divided the nineteenth-century Russian intelligentsia, and has returned to haunt the post-1991 society of the New Russians. Westerners who visited the Muscovite Russian state in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries described a fascinating but alien place. By the late eighteenth century, however, Russian aristocrats living in the empire shaped by Peter the Great (1682–1725) and Catherine the Great (1762–96) inhabited a world increasingly like that of their European counterparts. Muscovite “horse culture” both contributed to this process of convergence and reflected its progress.

Keywords

Seventeenth Century Sixteenth Century Austrian Emperor Early Modern Period Horse Breeding 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Jacques Mulliez, Les Chevaux Au royaume: Histoire de l’élevage du cheval et de la création des haras (Paris: Montalba, 1983), 8.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Luigi Gianoli, Horses and Horsemanship through the Ages trans. Iris Brooks (New York: Crown Publishers, 1969), 95.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Quoted in S. Bökönyi, History of Domestic Mammals in Central and Eastern Europe (Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadö, 1974), 267–68. For the comments of foreign observers in Muscovy, seeGoogle Scholar
  4. Sigmund von Herberstein, Description of Moscow and Muscovy ed. Bertold Picard, trans. J. B. C. Grundy (London: Dent, 1969), 76Google Scholar
  5. Jacques Margeret, The Russian Empire and Grand Duchy of Muscovy: A 17th-Century French Account trans. and ed. Chester S. L. Dunning (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1983), 47–48Google Scholar
  6. Adam Olearius, The Travels of Olearius in 17th-Century Russia trans. and ed. Samuel H. Baron (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1967), 330.Google Scholar
  7. 4.
    G. F. Odintsov, Iz istorii gippologicheskoi leksiki v russkom iazyke (Moscow: Nauka, 1980), 31Google Scholar
  8. D. Ia. Gurevich and G. T. Rogalev, Slovar’-spravochnik po konevodstvu i konnomu sportu (Moscow: Rosagropromizdat, 1991), 12; see the illustration of “an argamak from the Tsar’s Stables,” in Nikolai Kutepov, Velikokniazheskaia i tsarskaia okhota na Rusi s X po XVI vek 2nd edn. (St. Petersburg: Ekspeditsiia zagotovelniia gos. bumag 1896), after 174. “Argamak,” a Tatar word, was used in old Russian as a collective term for purebred Eastern horses (as distinct from “nemetskii” or “German,” which referred to horses from Western Europe; the term originally meant “dumb” or “mute” and so may refer to any and all non-Russian speakers). By the 1400s argamaki were being treated as a distinct breed. References to Tatar, Polish, and Turkish argamaki suggest that they were also being bred elsewhere, and traded back into Russia.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Zeziulinskii, Istoricheskoe izsledovanie o konnozavodskom dele v Rossii I (St. Petersburg: Tipo-lit. Iu. Ia. Rimana, 1889), appendices to ch. III, no. 1.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Isaac Massa, A Short History of the Beginnings and Origins of These Present Wars in Moscow under the Reign of Various Sovereigns down to the Year 1610 trans. and ed. G. Edward Orchard (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1982), 128–29Google Scholar
  11. Miklós Jankovich, They Rode into Europe: The Fruitful Exchange in the Arts of Horsemanship between East and West trans. Anthony Dent (London: Harrap, 1971), 94–97, 158. Seventeenth-century engravings of Polish hussar officers with wings attached to their saddles are reproduced inGoogle Scholar
  12. Jan K. Ostrowski, Thomas Dacosta Kaufmann, and the Walters Art Gallery, Land of the Winged Horsemen: Art in Poland, 1572–1764 (Alexandria, VA: Art Services International, in association with Yale University Press, 1999), 72–73. The False Dmitri appeared after the death of the “real” Dmitri, youngest son of Ivan the Terrible, and Fedor, Dmitri’s half-brother, to challenge the rule of Boris Godunov; he was killed in a coup in May 1606.Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    For illustrations, see the striking icons of Novgorod masters from the late fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. The portrayal of horses in later icons reflects the growing popularity among the elite of larger, heavier West European breeds. On the cult of the horse guardians, see Ann M. Kleimola, “Visions of Horses: The Evolution of the Russian Cult of Florus and Laurus,” Mesto Rossii v Evrazii/The Place of Russia in Eurasia Ruszisztikai Könyvek vol. IX (Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University, 2001), 86–95. Although there are no written records to confirm that the horses depicted in the icons are argamaki I believe they most likely are: the icons clearly show a difference between the saints’ steeds and the more common tabun horses.Google Scholar
  14. 12.
    Daphne Machin Goodall, A History of Horse Breeding (London: Robert Hale, 1977), 204.Google Scholar
  15. 13.
    There are 100 kopeks to the ruble. On horse prices in the seventeenth century, see Richard Hellie, The Economy and Material Culture of Russia 1600–1725 (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1999), 40–45, 574–78.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    L. N. Vdovina, “Zemledelie i skotovodstvo,” in Ocherki russkoi kul’tury XVII veka pt. I (Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1979), 54.Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    cf. A. A. Zimin, “O slozhenii prikaznoi sistemy na Rusi,” Doklady i soobshcheniia instituta istorii AN SSSR 3 (1954): 166–67Google Scholar
  18. Grigorii Kotoshikhin, O Rossii v tsarstvovanie Alekseia Mikhailovicha 4th edn. (St. Petersburg: Izd. Imp. Arkheograficheskoi kommissii, 1906), ch. VI; Zeziulinskii, Istoricheskoe izsledovanie I, 64–68Google Scholar
  19. M. M. Denisova, “Koniushennaia kazna,” in Gosudarstvennaia oruzheinaia palata moskovskogo kremlia (Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1954), 250–51; Gosudarstvennaia oruzheinaia palata (Moscow: Sovetskii khudozhnik, 1988), 373–74. By 1666 the Saddle Treasury maintained a separate branch at the Argamak Stables to handle the sovereign’s excursions and campaign transport; Rossiiskii Gosudarstvennyi Arkhiv Drevnykh Aktov, f. 396, op. 1, d. 10504, l. 2.Google Scholar
  20. 23.
    I. Merder, Istoricheskii ocherk russkago konevodstva i konnozavodstva (St. Petersburg: Tipografiia E. Metsiga, 1868), 22Google Scholar
  21. E. V. Kozhevnikov and D. Ia. Gurevich, Otechestvennoe konevodstvo (Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1990), 14.Google Scholar
  22. 24.
    Pamiatniki diplomaticheskikh snoshenii Drevnei Rossii s derzhavami inostrannymi II (St. Petersburg: v Tip. II-go Otdeleniia Sobstvennoi E. I. V. Kantseliarii, 1852), 518; N. M. Karamzin, Istoriia gosudarstva rossiiskago (St. Petersburg: v. Tip. Imperatorskoi akademii nauk, 1842), XI, 79; Massa, Short History 49; Zeziulinskii, Istoricheskoe izsledovanie I, 37 (n. 2) and appendices to ch. V, no. 5.Google Scholar
  23. 26.
    Zeziulinskii, Istoricheskoe izsledovanie I, 31 (and n. 2), 32–45; M. E. Lobashev, Ocherki po istorii russkogo zhivotnovodstva (Moscow-Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, 1954), 28.Google Scholar
  24. 27.
    Vdovina, “Zemledelie i skotovodstvo,” 54; A. I. Zaozerskii, Tsarskaia votchina XVII v. (Moscow: Sotsekgiz, 1937), 114.Google Scholar
  25. 28.
    E. I. Indova, “Dvortsovoe zhivotnovodstvo v pervoi polovine XVIII v.,” Materialy po istorii sel’skogo khoziaistva i krest’ianstva SSSR V (Moscow: Nauka, 1962), 105.Google Scholar
  26. 30.
    M. N. Tikhomirov, “Monastyr’-votchinnik XVI v.,” Istoricheskie zapiski 3 (1938), 139–41.Google Scholar
  27. 31.
    N. A. Gorskaia, “Zemledelie i skotovodstvo,” in Ocherki russkoi kul’tury XVI veka pt. I (Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1977), 92 n. 267; Materialy po istorii krest’ian v russkom gosudarstve XVI veka ed. A. G. Man’kov (Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Leningradskogo universiteta, 1955), nos. 3, 5, and 8.Google Scholar
  28. 32.
    Nikolai Nikol’skii, Kirillo-Belozerskii monastyr’ i ego ustroistvo do vtoroi chetverti XVII veka (1397–1625) vol. I, pt. 1 (St. Petersburg: Sinodal’naia tip., 1897), 265–68, appendix 6 (pp. LXXXV–XC), and pt. 2 (St. Petersburg: Sinodal’naia tip., 1910), 107 and n. 1.Google Scholar
  29. 33.
    A. S. Prokof’eva, Votchinnoe khoziaistvo v XVII veke (Moscow-Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, 1959), 9, 25–28.Google Scholar
  30. 34.
    K. A. Filimonov, “Iz istorii koniushennogo khoziaistva Troitse-Sergievoi lavry XV–XIX vv.,” Trudy po istorii Troitse-Sergievoi lavry (Sergiev-Posad: Izdatel’skii dom “Podkova,” 1998), 113.Google Scholar
  31. 35.
    E. N. Klitina, T. N. Manushina, and T. V. Nikolaeva (eds.), Vkladnaia kniga Troitse-Sergieva monastyria (Moscow: Nauka, 1987), 59, 68, 88, 110, 139.Google Scholar
  32. 36.
    V. I. Kuznetsov, “Dvorianskaia usad’ba v strukture sel’skikh poselenii rossiiskogo gosudarstva XVI–XVII vv.” Vestnik moskovskogo universiteta Seriia 8, Istoriia, no. 6 (1989), 53.Google Scholar
  33. 37.
    V. D. Nazarov and Iu. A. Tikhonov, “Pomeshchich’e imenie v Rossii v pervoi polovine XVII v. (Osnovnye demograficheskie i khoziaistvennye cherty),” Ezhegodnik po agrarnoi istorii vostochnoi Evropy 1971 g. (Vilnius: Izdatel’stvo Mintic, 1974), 72.Google Scholar
  34. 38.
    Iu. A. Tikhonov, “Podmoskovnye imeniia russkoi aristokratii vo vtoroi polovine XVII–nachale XVIII v.,” in Dvorianstvo i krepostnoi stroi Rossii XVI–XVIII vv. (Moscow: Nauka, 1975), 140–41, 146–47, 149–51, 154–55; Rozysknyia dela o Fedore Shaklovitom i ego soobshchnikakh IV (St. Petersburg: Izd. Arkheograficheskoi kommissii, 1893), col. 347.Google Scholar
  35. 39.
    See, for example, A. A. Vvedenskii, Torgovyi dom XVI–XVII vekov (Leningrad: kn-vo “Put’ k znaniiu,” 1924), 30–31, 45, 47–48, 50; Nazarov and Tikhonov, “Pomeshchich’e imenie,” 76 and n. 36; Akty khoziaistva boiarina B. I. Morozova ed. A. I. Iakovlev, pt. I (Moscow-Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, 1940), no. 74, and pt. II (Moscow-Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, 1945), nos. 331, 421, 536.Google Scholar
  36. 40.
    D. I. Petrikeev, “Zemel’nye vladeniia boiarina B. I. Morozova,” Istoricheskie zapiski 21 (1947), 65; Akty khoziaistva B. I. Morozova pt. II, nos. 230, 254, 286, 306, 331.Google Scholar
  37. 42.
    On estate culture see Priscilla Roosevelt, Life on the Russian Country Estate: A Social and Cultural History (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  38. 43.
    Heinrich von Staden, The Land and Government of Muscovy trans. and ed. Thomas Esper (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1967), 115.Google Scholar
  39. 45.
    D. S. Likhachev, Poeziia sadov: K semantike sadovo-parkovykh stilei— Sad kak teksst 2nd edn. (St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1991), 110–26.Google Scholar
  40. 46.
    A. A. Stepanov, “Kniaz’ V. V. Golitsyn kak khoziain-votchinnik,” Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR (1926), 45–48; Lindsey A. J. Hughes, Russia and the West, the Life of a Seventeenth-Century Westernizer, Prince Vasily Vasil’evich Golitsyn (1643–1714) (Newtonville, MA: Oriental Research Partners, 1984), 5, 12; Tikhonov, “Podmoskovnye imeniia,” 146–51; Rozysknyia dela o Fedore Shaklovitom i ego soobshchnikakh III (St. Petersburg: Izd. Arkheograficheskoi kommissii, 1888), nos. 24, 29. The text (no. 24) refers to tsesarskii and imeretinskii both of which indicate “imperial”—in Europe the “Emperor’s” breed referred to horses from the stud of the Holy Roman Emperor at Lipizza, established in 1580; seeGoogle Scholar
  41. R. H. C. Davis, The Medieval Warhorse: Origin, Developmentand Redevelopment (London: Thames and Hudson Inc., 1989), 121.Google Scholar
  42. 48.
    Herberstein, Description of Moscow and Muscovy 76, 78; Lloyd E. Berry and Robert O. Crummey (eds.), Rude and Barbarous Kingdom: Russia in the Accounts of Sixteenth-Century English Voyagers (Madison: University of Wisconsin, 1968), 71, 76, 82.Google Scholar
  43. 49.
    Denisova, “Koniushennaia kazna,” 259, 290–91; Jankovich, They Rode into Europe 97–100; Nyeregbe! In the Saddle! Exhibition at the Museum of Ethnography 22 March-10 September 2002 (Budapest: Néprajzi Múzeum, 2002), 84–85; Ostrowski et al., Land of the Winged Horsemen plates 71–74. On the origins of the hussars, see Gyula Ràzsó, “The Mercenary Army of King Matthias Corvinus,” in From Hunyadi to Rákóczi: War and Society in Late Medieval and Early Modern Hungary ed. János M. Bak and Béla K. Kiràly (Brooklyn, NY: Brooklyn College Press, 1982), 125–40.Google Scholar
  44. 50.
    Gift horses from abroad usually came well-dressed in expensive saddles, jeweled headstalls, and the like. Both horses and tack, after their “presentation” to the ruler, were immediately appraised and handed over to the Stables Chancellery; Denisova, “Koniushennaia kazna,” 276. An early eighteenth-century inventory of the Stables Chancellery treasury provides detailed descriptions of tack and equipment, noting the date and origin of items as well as an appraised value; see A. Viktorov, Opisanie zapisnykh knig i bumag starinnykh dvortsovykh prikazov 1613–1725 g. (Moscow: S. P. Arkhipov, 1883), II, 495–504. For examples of Polish horse gear, see Ostrowski et al., Land of the Winged Horsemen plates 70–72; for Russian and Turkish examples, see Treasures of the Czars from the State Museums of the Moscow Kremlin, Presented by Kansas International Museum (London: Booth-Clibborn Editions, 1995), 100–2, 104–9, and Paradnoe oruzhie i konskoe ubranstvo XVII–XVIII vv./Ornamental weapons and horse accoutrements of the 17th and 18th centuries ed. O. I. Mironova and E. V. Tikhomirova (Moscow: Izdatel’stvo “Izobrazitel’noe iskusstvo,” 1986).Google Scholar
  45. 53.
    See, for example, Massa, Short History 127–29; Olearius, Travels of Olearius 57–58, 70–74; Guy Miege A Relation of Three Embassies from his Sacred Majestie Charles II to the Great Duke of Muscovie, the King of Sweden, and the King of Denmark. Performed by the … Earle of Carlisle in the years 1663 and 1664 (London: Printed for John Starkey, 1669), 127–32Google Scholar
  46. Lindsey Hughes, Sophia, Regent of Russia, 1657–1704 (New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 1990), 42.Google Scholar
  47. 54.
    Joan Thirsk, Horses in Early Modern England: For Service, for Pleasure, for Power Stanton Lecture 1977 (Reading, UK: University of Reading, 1978), 7.Google Scholar
  48. 57.
    Peter Edwards, The Horse Trade of Tudor and Stuart England (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 12, 20, 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 61.
    Rozysknyia dela o Fedore Shaklovitom i ego soobshchnikakh (St. Petersburg: Izd. Arkheograficheskoi kommissii, 1888), IV, col. 56; S. P. Luppov, Kniga v Rossii v XVII veke (Leningrad: Nauka, 1970), 107–10; Hughes, Sophia, Regent of Russia 48, 161.Google Scholar
  50. 63.
    N. N. Nazarenko, “Nekotorye rukopisnye istochniki po zootekhnii XVII–XVIII vekov,” Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniia i tekhniki 1 (1956): 236–41Google Scholar
  51. A. I. Sobolevskii, Perevodnaia literatura moskovskoi Rusi XIV–XVII vekov (St. Petersburg: Tip. Imp. Akademii nauk, 1903–8), 112–15.Google Scholar
  52. 68.
    Nikolai Kutepov, Velikokniazheskaia i tsarskaia okhota na Rusi s X po XVI vek 2nd edn. (St. Petersburg: Ékspeditsiia zagotovleniia gos. bumag, 1896) and Tsarskaia okhota na Rusi tsarei Mikhaila Feodorovicha i Alekseia Mikhailovicha XVII vek (St. Petersburg: Ékspeditsiia zagotovleniia gos. bumag, 1898).Google Scholar
  53. 73.
    Oleg Ivanov, Graf Aleksei Grigor’evich Orlov-Chesmenskii v Moskve (Moscow: Svarog i K, 2002); Goodall, History of Horse Breeding 208–9; Merder, Istoricheskii ocherk 150–57Google Scholar
  54. Vladimir Plugin, Alekhan, ili Chelovek so shramom: Zhizneopisanie grafa Alekseia Orlova-Chesmenskogo (Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, 1996), 352–56; Kozhevnikov and Gurevich, Otechestvennoe konevod-stvo 29–41; Gurevich and Rogalev, Slovar’-spravochnik po konevod-stvu 131–34. In 1867 Beduin, a great-great-great-great-great grandson of Bars I, broke the world speed record for trotters at the Paris Exhibition.?63-90Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Karen Raber and Treva J. Tucker 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann M. Kleimola

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations