From Couch to Corporate

The Origins of Short Term Corporate Therapy
  • Anna Rowley


I am often asked to describe the theoretical underpinnings of my work. Am I a Freudian, a cognitive psychologist, or a positive psychologist? The answers I give are invariably yes, yes, and yes. Like many therapists practicing today I am eclectic in my approach and let the needs of the client dictate my method. Certain practitioners and theoreticians have had a tremendous impact on the development of Short Term Corporate Therapy (STCT). For newcomers to this type of therapy, being aware of the roots of my practice is key to understanding what it is—and what it isn’t—and helps pave the way for the work that lies ahead.


Team Meeting Young Athlete Competitive Sport Automatic Thought Personal Brand 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    The reasons for Freud’s use of a couch are many and varied. My two favorites are that he wanted to thumb his nose at the conventions of the day and having a person, particularly a woman, recline in a man’s office was definitely risqué for the times. The other was that Freud could not stand looking at his patients all the time so sitting behind a couch afforded him the opportunity to escape their gaze and look at the backs of their heads instead! J. A. Kottler, On Being a Therapist (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2003), 287.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Gleick, Faster (New York: Pantheon Books, 1999), 324.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Harnois and P. Gabriel, “Mental Health at Work,” in Nations f or Mental Health (Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2000), 77.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. S. Sullivan, The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry (New York: W.W. Norton), 393.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. A. C. Brown, Freud and the Post-Freudian (London: Penguin Books, 1972), 225.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. Garmezy and M. Rutter, Eds., Stress, Coping and Development in Children (New York: McGraw Hill, 1983), 356.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Minuchin, Families and Family Therapy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974), 268.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. P. Nichols and R. C. Schwartz, Family Therapy: Concepts and Methods, 6th ed., P. Quinlin, ed. (Boston: Pearson, 2004), 489.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. R. Katzenbach and D. K. Smith, The Wisdom of Teams: Creating a High Performance Organization (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1993), 291.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    J. E. Groves, ed., Essential Papers on Short-Term Dynamic Psychotherapy (New York: New York University Press, 1996), 545.Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    S. D. Gosling and S. J. Ko, “A Room with a Cue: Personality Judgments Based on Offices and Bedrooms,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82, no. 3 (2002): 379–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 15.
    T. Leary, Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality (New York: The Ronald Press Company, 1957), 518.Google Scholar
  13. 16.
    L. K. Libby and R. Eibach, “Here’s Looking at Me: The Effect of Memory Perspective on Assessment of Personal Change,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88, no. 1 (2005): 50–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 17.
    S. H. Budman and A. S. Gurman, “Theory and Practice of Brief Therapy,” in Essential Papers on Short-Term Dynamic Therapy, J. E. Groves, ed. (New York: New York University Press, 1996), 43–65.Google Scholar
  15. 18.
    M. Epstein, Open to Desire: Embracing a Lust for Life (New York: Gotham Books, 2005), 227.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Anna Rowley 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Rowley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations