Post-New Deal Hurja

  • Melvin G. Holli
Part of the The Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute Series on Diplomatic and Economic History book series (WOOROO)


Flushed with victory from an unprecedented landslide of historic proportions, second-term Roosevelt was emboldened to strike at his political enemies with new vigor and venom. Angered by the invalidation of much New Deal legislation by what a White House aide sneeringly called a “horse and buggy” Supreme Court, the president launched his fight against the justices. His proposed Judicial Reform bill would have enabled the president to appoint six new Supreme Court justices for every member past age 70 who refused to retire. Eighty-year-old Justice Louis D. Brandeis, a liberal pro—New Dealer, was shocked and believed that Roosevelt had made a serious mistake. Democratic national chairman James Farley, although he publicly cooperated with the president in rounding up congressional votes for the measure, was known to privately oppose what became known as the “Court packing” bill. Democratic floor leaders in Congress who had received little or no advanced notice were even more annoyed by the president’s bombshell. Democratic majority leader in the Senate Joe Robinson was opposed, as was a passel of New Deal and liberal senators, including Burton K. Wheeler, Joseph C. Mahoney, David Walsh and George Norris. Wheeler, in a radio talk, warned Americans that Roosevelt was trying to create a “political court” controlled by the president that might at some future time “cut down those guarantees of liberty written by the blood of your forefathers.”


Swedish Government Congressional Vote Midterm Election Supreme Court Justice Public Relation Firm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 6.
    Erwin C. Hargrove, The President as Leader: Appealing to the Better Angels of our Nature ( Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1998 ), 99;Google Scholar
  2. H. H. Remers, Introduction to Opinion and Attitude Measurement ( New York: Harper Bros., 1954 ), 295.Google Scholar
  3. 7.
    Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., The Imperial Presidency (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1989), 187, 206–07, 441;Google Scholar
  4. Robert M. Eisinger and Jeremy Brown, “Polling as a Means toward Presidential Autonomy: Emil Hurja, Hadley Cantril and the Roosevelt Administration,” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 10, no. 1 (1998), 237f;Google Scholar
  5. Richard W. Steele, “American Popular Opinion and the War Against Germany: The Issue of Negotiated Peace, 1942,” Journal of American History LLLXV, no. 3 (December 1978), 704f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 8.
    William E. Leuchtenburg, The FDR Years: On Roosevelt and his Legacy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995), 28, 29. Also seeGoogle Scholar
  7. Joan Biskupic, “Gavelving Back the Imperial Presidency,” Washington Post Weekly Edition, 9 June 1997, 21.Google Scholar
  8. 14.
    Olavi Koivukangas, “The Beginnings of Finnish Migration to the New World,” exhibition catalog (Turku, Finland: Migration Institute, 1988 ).Google Scholar
  9. 17.
    John Wuorinen, The Finns on the Delaware ( New York: Columbia University Press, 1938 ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Melvin G. Holli 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melvin G. Holli

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations