Abstract
In France today women are in the process of taking feminism to a turning point. By demanding, with parité, the de facto sharing of political responsibilities, they are clearly rejecting the nondifferentialist ideology that, despite equal rights, preserves the ever-persistent male monopoly of power. Parité is not a way of letting nature “dictate law” (we know full well that nature itself never “dictates”); rather, it is a way of giving meaning to human existence characterized by sexual difference (sexué). Nature has never founded anything: neither the past hierarchy of the sexes, nor the present demand for their equality All this is political through and through. Nevertheless, the fact that human beings are characterized by their sex (sexué), that they are born boys or girls, that they can become fathers or mothers (but not both at the same time: such is the constraint of the dichotomy of the sexes) is not political—despite what Judith Butler and some others have said.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Judith Butler, Gender Trouble (New York: Routledge, 1990).
Joan Scott, Only Paradoxes to Offer (Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1996).
Quoted in Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex, trans. H. M. Parshley (New York: Vintage Books, 1989), xx.
Françoise Héritier, Masculin/féminin: la pensée de la différence (Paris: Odile Jacob, 1996).
See in particular Blandine Kriegel, Philosophie de la République (Paris: Plon, 1998).
Claude Lévi-Strauss, Structural Anthropology, trans. Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf (New York: Basic Books, 1963), 47–48.
See Evelyne Pisier’s “PACS et Parité: du même et de l’autre,” Le Monde (October 20, 1998).
Sylviane Agacinski, Lapolitique des sexes (Paris: Seuil, 1996).
This change was set in motion in particular by Antoinette Fouque. See Il y a deux sexes: essais de féminologie, 1989–1995 (Paris: Gallimard, 1995).
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2003 Roger Célestin, Eliane DalMolin, Isabelle de Courtivron
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Agacinski, S. (2003). The Turning Point of Feminism. In: Célestin, R., DalMolin, E., de Courtivron, I. (eds) Beyond French Feminisms. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-09514-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-09514-5_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-0-312-24040-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-09514-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)