Advertisement

Machine Dreams

  • Harvey Roy Greenberg

Abstract

science fiction cinema has consistently, if unconsciously, manifested an intriguing split in its attitude toward the machine, treating it unabashedly as a dehumanizing oppressor while lovingly lingering over its gleaming gizmos. Crash, scripted nearly faithfully by David Cronenberg from English sci-fi writer J. G. Ballard’s 1973 cult novel, knowingly interrogates this ambivalence in a harrowing exploration of the human/machine symbiosis—specifically the human automotive interface. (Note that the director himself has been an amateur racer and car enthusiast.)

Keywords

Amateur Racer Horror Film Male Purity Sexual Ritual Proletarian Revolution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    See J. G. Ballard, Crash (New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 1994). Cronenberg/Ballard’s fusion of the human and the inanimate/mechanical has numerous precedents in early twentieth-century painting and theater that address a wide spectrum of ideological positions. The unabashed machine idolatry of many Futurists and Vorticists was informed by a prefascist sensibility. Russian Constructivism often valorized the human/machine interface in the name of the proletarian revolution. The leftist-inflected theatrical projects of Meyerhold in Russia, of Ernst Toller and Georg Kaiser in Germany inter alia prominently featured “biomechanical” tropes in script, acting, and set design.Google Scholar
  2. For an extensive discussion, see Oscar G. Brockett, The History of Theater (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1974).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    The seminal reference in this regard is Klaus Theweleit’s studies of the Freikorps, a loosely knit fellowship of disaffiliated young men, many former soldiers, who gathered together after World War I to redeem the Fatherland’s savaged honor in the context of what they perceived as the debasements of the Weimar Republic and the rising tide of Bolshevism. Klaus Theweleit, Male Fantasies: Volume 1: Women, Floods, Bodies, History, trans. Erica Carter, Chris Turner, and Steven Conway (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987); Male Fantasies: Volume 2: Male Bodies: Psychoanalyzing the White Terror, trans. Steven Conway, Erica Carter and Chris Turner (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989). Theweleit uses Freikorps mores and costumes as a springboard for a masterful analysis of masculine anxiety regarding castration and impotence, attendant terror of the feminine, and compensatory homosocial/homoerotic visions of male purity. This work has obvious, ominous currency regarding the contemporary American militia movement as well as other renascent fascist movements abroad.Google Scholar
  4. Recent studies extending Thewelheit’s interrogations of the “armored body” include Scott Bukatman’s Terminal Identity: The Virtual Subject in Postmodern Science Fiction (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1993) andGoogle Scholar
  5. Christopher Sharrett’s “The Horror Film in Neoconservative Culture,” in Barry Keith Grant, ed., The Dread of Difference: Gender and the Horror Film (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mikita Brottman 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harvey Roy Greenberg

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations