“We are the makers of manners”

The Branagh Phenomenon
  • Mark Thornton Burnett

Abstract

This essay concerns itself with the development of Kenneth Branagh as a Shakespearean film director, producer, performer, and interpreter. It addresses all of Branaghs Shakespeare films to date, arguing that they can only be properly understood when discussed as a corpus and in relation to the cinematic work of his predecessors and contemporaries. Like Henry V, his alterego, Branagh is distinctive for having made (or created) the manners (or fashions) that have revitalized “Shakespeare” for a postmodern clientele. At the same time, however, Branagh has become the victim of these manners; although he has exorcized himself of the ghosts of previous luminaries of the establishment, he has now to compete with a host of related Shakespearean filmic interpretations, treatments that he himself has been instrumental in popularizing. In the same way that Frankenstein, another role reinvented by the auteur, is plagued by his creature, so has Branagh come to be haunted by his own screen progeny. As a result, Branaghs cinematic renditions of the Bard for the twentieth and twenty-first centuries reveal a movement from an entrenched, establishment-bound veneration for the dramatist to a much freer, more playful engagement with the “Schlockspearean.” Through Branaghs career in miniature, then, we can glimpse the contours of a development that has marked Shakespearean studies in general, a critical position that begins with serious adaptation and ends with appropriation, kitsch, and even pastiche. More generally, the desire to bring Shakespeare to as broad a community as possible has involved Branagh in the production of “schlock” outside the strictly demarcated classical forum, the release of Mary Shelleys “Frankenstein” (1994), with its deployment of horror and slasher movie motifs, being but one example.

Keywords

Mold Explosive Smoke Ghost Bleached 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  1. Arnold, Gary. 1996. “Branagh Breathes New Life into Classics.” Insight on the News, January 15: 36–7.Google Scholar
  2. “Branagh Brings the Scottish Play up to Date.” 1999. Belfast News, May 13: 9.Google Scholar
  3. Branagh, Kenneth. 1996. “Hamlet” by William Shakespeare: Screenplay, Introduction and Film Diary. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
  4. Branagh, Kenneth. 1993. “Much Ado About Nothing” by William Shakespeare: Screenplay, Introduction, and Notes on the Making of the Movie. New York and London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  5. Bright, Curtis. 1991. “Branagh and the Prince, or a ‘royal fellowship of death.’” Critical Quarterly, 33, 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burt, Richard. 2001. “T(e)en Things I Hate about Girlene Shakesploitation Flicks in the Late 1990s, or, Not So Fast Times at Shakespeare High.” In Screening the Bard: Shakespearean Spectacle, Critical Theory, Film Practice. Ed. by Lisa Starks and Courtney Lehmann. Madison, NJ: American Univ. Presses, 205–232.Google Scholar
  7. Commemorative Programme: William Shakespeares “Hamlet,” Directed by Kenneth Branagh. 1997. Belfast: Graham & Heslip.Google Scholar
  8. Coursen, H. R. 1996. Shakespeare in Production: Whose History?. Athens: Ohio Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  9. Deleyto, Celestino. 1997. “Men in Leather: Kenneth Branagh’s Much Ado About Nothing and Romantic Comedy.” Cinema Journal, 36(3): 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duguid, Lindsay. 2000. “No Kicks in a Plane.” Times literary Supplement, April 7: 34.Google Scholar
  11. Fineman, Joel. 1980. “Fratricide and Cuckoldry: Shakespeare’s Doubles.” In Representing Shakespeare: New Essays. Ed. by Murray M. Schwartz and Coppélia Kahn. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 70–109.Google Scholar
  12. Fitter, Chris. 1991. “A Tale of Two Branaghs: Henry V, Ideology, and the Mekong Ag-incourt.” In Shakespeare, Left and Right. Ed. by Ivo Kamps. New York and London: Routledge, 259–75.Google Scholar
  13. Gristwood, Sarah. 2000. “What Is this Thing Called Love’s Labour’s Lost?.” The Guardian: Arts. March 27: 12–13.Google Scholar
  14. Guntner, Lawrence. 1995. “Recycled Film Codes and ‘The Great Tradition of Shakespeare on Film.’” In Negotiations with Hal: Multi-Media Perceptions of (Shakespeare’s) “Henry the Fifth. ” Ed. by Peter Drexler and Lawrence Guntner. Braunschweig: Univ. Braunschweig, 51–61.Google Scholar
  15. Hedrick, Donald K. 1997. “War Is Mud: Branagh’s Dirty Harry V and the Types of Political Ambiguity.” In Shakespeare, the Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV, and Video. Ed. by Lynda E. Boose and Richard Burt. New York and London: Routledge, 45–66.Google Scholar
  16. Holderness, Graham. 1991. “‘What ish my nation?’: Shakespeare and National Identities.” Textual Practice, 5: 74–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jackson, Russell. 1997. “Shakespeare’s Comedies on Film.” In Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television. Ed. by Anthony Davies and Stanley Wells. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 99–120.Google Scholar
  18. “Ken’s Labour Lost on the Bard.” 2001. The Daily Express. January 30: 39.Google Scholar
  19. Kenneth Branagh’s “The Shakespeare Film Company.” 2000. London: Intermedia.Google Scholar
  20. Lanier, Douglas. 1996. “Drowning the Book: Prospero’s Books and the Textual Shakespeare.” In Shakespeare, Theory, and Performance. Ed. by James C. Bulman. New York and London: Routledge, 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lehmann, Courtney, and Lisa S. Starks. 2000. “Making Mother Matter: Repression, Revision, and the Stakes of ‘Reading Psychoanalysis’ into Kenneth Branagh’s Hamlet.” Early Modern Literary Studies. 6(1): 1–18.Google Scholar
  22. LoMonico, Michael. 1996. “Branagh’s Hamlet—Power and Opulence.” Shakespeare 1(1): 6–7.Google Scholar
  23. Morgan, Hilary. 1999. “Made in Belfast.” The Sunday Mirror, August 1: 7.Google Scholar
  24. Moses, Carol. 1996. “Kenneth Branagh’s Much Ado About Nothing: Shakespearean Comedy as Shakespearean Romance.” Shakespeare Bulletin 14(1): 38–40.Google Scholar
  25. S., D. 1996. “N. B.” Times Literary Supplement, November 22: 16.Google Scholar
  26. Shakespeare, William. 1987. Hamlet. Ed. by Harold Jenkins. New York and London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  27. Shakespeare, William. 1975. Henry V Ed. by A. R. Humphreys. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  28. Shakespeare, William. 1982. Love’s Labour’s Lost. Ed. by John Kerrigan. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  29. Shakespeare, William. 1983. Much Ado About Nothing. Ed. by R. A. Foakes. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  30. Smith, David James. 2000. “In the Company of Ken.” The Sunday Times Magazine, February 20: 34–40.Google Scholar
  31. Wray, Ramona and Mark Thornton Burnett. 2000. “From the Horse’s Mouth: Branagh on the Bard.” In Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siècle. Ed. by Mark Thornton Burnett and Ramona Wray. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 165–78.Google Scholar

Films Cited

  1. Allen, Woody, dir. 1998. Celebrity. USA Sound, b/w, 113 mins.Google Scholar
  2. Almereyda, Michael, dir. 2000. Hamlet. USA Miramax. Sound, col., 106 mins.Google Scholar
  3. Bergeron, Eric, dir. 2000. The Road to El Dorado. USA Disney. Sound, col., 89 mins.Google Scholar
  4. Branagh, Kenneth, dir. 1989. Henry V. U.K. Renaissance Films. Sound, col., 132 mins.Google Scholar
  5. — dir. 1997. Hamlet. USA Castle Rock. Sound, col., 232 mins.Google Scholar
  6. — dir. 1995. In the Bleak Midwinter. U.K. Castle Rock. Sound, col., 95 mins.Google Scholar
  7. — dir. 2000. love’s labour’s lost. USA Intermedia. Sound, col., 90 mins.Google Scholar
  8. — dir. 1994. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. USATristar Pictures. Sound, col., 118 mins.Google Scholar
  9. — dir. 1993. Much Ado About Nothing. U.K. Samuel Goldwyn and Renaissance Films. Sound, col., 104 mins.Google Scholar
  10. — dir. 1992. Peter’s Friends. U.K. Samuel Goldwyn and Renaissance Films. Sound, col., 98 mins.Google Scholar
  11. Glatter, Lesli Linka, dir. 1998. The Proposition. USA PolyGram. Sound, col., 107 mins.Google Scholar
  12. Greengrass, Paul, dir. 1998. The Theory of Flight. U.K./USA Sound, col., 101 mins.Google Scholar
  13. Hoffman, Michael, dir. 1999. A Midsummer Night’s Dream. USA Twentieth Century Fox. Sound, col., 116 mins.Google Scholar
  14. Junger, Gil, dir. 1999. Ten Things I Hate about You. USA Touchstone Pictures. Sound, col., 93 mins.Google Scholar
  15. Kubrick, Stanley, dir. 1987. Full Metal Jacket. USA Warner Brothers. Sound, col., 111 mins.Google Scholar
  16. Kubrick, Stanley, dir. 1960. Spartacus. USA Universal. Sound, col., 186 minutes.Google Scholar
  17. Lean, David, dir. 1965. Dr. Zhivago. USA Warner Brothers. Sound, col., 192 mins.Google Scholar
  18. Loncraine, Richard, dir. 1996. Richard III. U.K./USA United Artists. Sound, col., 150 mins.Google Scholar
  19. Luhrmann, Baz, dir. 1996. William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet. USA Twentieth Century Fox. Sound, col., 115 mins.Google Scholar
  20. Madden, John, dir. 1998. Shakespeare in love. USA Universal. Sound, col., 119 mins.Google Scholar
  21. Noble, Adrian, dir. 1996. A Midsummer Night’s Dream. U.K. Capitol Films/Channel Four. Sound, col., 100 mins.Google Scholar
  22. Olivier, Laurence, dir. 1948. Hamlet. U.K. Two Cities Films. Sound, b/w, 155 mins.Google Scholar
  23. — dir. 1944. Henry V. U.K. Two Cities Films. Sound, col., 131 mins.Google Scholar
  24. Parker, Oliver, dir. 1995. Othello. USA Castle Rock, Sound, col., 119 mins.Google Scholar
  25. Sonnenfeld, Barry, dir. 1999. Wild, Wild West. USA Warner Brothers. Sound, col., 105 mins.Google Scholar
  26. Stone, Oliver, dir. 1989. Born on the Fourth of July. USA Universal. Sound, col., 138 mins.Google Scholar
  27. — dir. 1986. Platoon. USA MGM. Sound, col., 114 mins.Google Scholar
  28. —, dir. 1987. Wall Street. USA Twentieth Century Fox. Sound, col., 120 mins.Google Scholar
  29. Sturges, John, dir. 1960. The Magnificent Seven. MGM. USA Sound, col., 127 mins.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Richard Burt 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Thornton Burnett

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations