Tenure Re-Structuring

  • Stuart Lowe


Britain underwent a dramatic restructuring of its housing tenure pattern during the course of the twentieth century. Why this should be the case requires explanation. Its significance is not only in the transformation of property rights and financial gains and losses in the housing stock but also to wider society. As Kemeny has shown, different configurations of housing tenure impact on urban form and welfare state development. ‘Home owning societies’, for example, are more likely to have private insurance-based, workfare forms of welfare provision (Kemeny, 1981). The scale of tenure restructuring in Britain over the twentieth century should make us vigilant for evidence of these wider issues. Looked at in this way ‘housing’ is not simply an accumulated stock of dwellings but is also a source, or at least a catalyst, to social change. It is something of a paradox that such an immovable entity as a stock of dwellings could be the focal point of dynamic social change. The explanation and development of this issue is discussed in detail in Chapter 10.


Local Authority House Price Housing Policy Housing Stock Rental Housing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further Reading

  1. Daunton, M. J. (1987) A Property-Owning Democracy–Housing in Britain, London, Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
  2. Holmans, A. E. (1987) Housing Policy in Britain, London, Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  3. Kemeny, J. (1995) From Public Housing to the Social Market, London, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Merrett, S. (1979) State Housing in Britain, London, Routledge & Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Stuart Lowe 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stuart Lowe

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations