Advertisement

Souls That Matter: The Gendering of the Soul in Piers Plowman

  • Elizabeth Robertson
Part of the The New Middle Ages book series (TNMA)

Abstract

When medieval theologians discuss the nature of the soul, they generally assume it and its faculties to be gender neutral, despite the fact that the most influential commentator on the soul, Aristotle, asserted a distinction between the male and female soul. When we turn to the poetic representations of the soul found in William Langland’s Piers Plowman, we find that assumptions about gender crucially shape its protagonist Will’s developing understanding of the nature of the soul. Since Will urgently seeks guidance for the salvation of his soul, Langland’s understanding of its nature informs Will’s progress through the poem. His journey entails encounters with multiple figures who teach him about the soul, most of them personifications gendered either male or female (for example, Holy Church (f.), Wit (m.), Clergy (m.), Study, (f.), and so on). He also twice meets the soul itself as a personified figure. Although a number of Langland’s gendered personifications have received attention from critics, including Elizabeth Kirk, interested in how theories of gender and sexuality shape our understanding of the poem, almost no one has considered the gendering of the soul itself as it appears in Piers Plowman both as a personified figure and as an informing principle in the poem.1 In some senses, Will is the soul, or at least that aspect of the soul that desires God.

Keywords

Naming Sequence Grammatical Gender Gender Marker Medieval Literature Theological Discussion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    James J. Paxson, “Gender Personified, Personified Gender,” Yearbook of Langland Studies 12 (1998): 65–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    James Simpson, Sciences and the Self in Medieval Poetry: Alan of Lille’s “Anticlaudianus” and John Gower’s “Confessio Amantis” (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Simpson, “From Reason to Affective Knowledge: Modes of Thought and Poetic Form in Piers PlowmanMedium Aevum 55.1 (1986): 1–23.Google Scholar
  4. A.V.C. Schmidt’s informative discussion of Langland’s acquaintance with scholastic philosophy, “Langland and Scholastic Philosophy,” Medium Aevum 38.2 (1969): 134–56.Google Scholar
  5. 3.
    A.V.C. Schmidt, William Langland: The Vision of Piers Plowman (London: Everyman, 1995).Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    St. Augustine, “On the Immortality of the Soul,” trans. G.C. Leckie, in Basic Writings of Saint Augustine, ed. Whitney J. Oates (New York: Random House, 1948), pp. 301–318.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    Martha Lee Osborne, Woman in Western Thought (New York: Random House, 1979), pp. 15–47.Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    Helen Cooper, “Gender and Personification in Piers Plowman,” Yearbook of Langland Studies 5 (1991): 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 13.
    Peter Stallybrass, “Patriarchal Territories: The Body Enclosed,” in Rewriting the Renaissance: The Discourses of Sexual Difference in Early Modem Europe, eds. Margaret W. Ferguson, Maureen Quilligan, and Nancy J. Vickers (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986), pp. 123–44.Google Scholar
  10. 14.
    Alcuin Blamires, The Case for Women in Medieval Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
  11. 15.
    Roberta Gilchrist, Gender and Archaeology: Contesting the Past (London: Routledge, 1991).Google Scholar
  12. 17.
    Randolph Quirk, “Langland’s Use of Kind Wit and Inwit,” Journal of English and Germanic Philology 52.2 (1953): 182–88.Google Scholar
  13. 18.
    Mary Carruthers, The Search for St. Truth: A Study of Meaning in “Piers Plowman” (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1973), p. 88.Google Scholar
  14. 20.
    Elizabeth Kirk, The Dream Thought of “Piers Plowman” (New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press, 1972), p. 108.Google Scholar
  15. 22.
    M. Teresa Tavormina, Kindly Similitude: Marriage and Family in “Piers Plowman” (Cambridge, UK: D.S. Brewer, 1995).Google Scholar
  16. 24.
    Mary Clémente Davlin, op, The Place of God in “Piers Plowman” and Medieval Art (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2001).Google Scholar
  17. 25.
    E. Jane Burns, Bodytalk: When Women Speak in Old French Literature (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  18. 26.
    St. Augustine, The Nature and the Origin of the Soul, in The Works of Saint Augustine, part 1: vol. 23: Answer to the Pelagians, trans. Roland J. Teske, SJ (Hyde Park, NY: New City Press, 1997), p. 555.Google Scholar
  19. 31.
    Louis Althusser, “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses,” in Critical Theory since 1965, ed. Hazard Adams and Leroy Searle (Tallahassee: Florida State University Press, 1986), pp. 239–51.Google Scholar
  20. 32.
    Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. Alan Sheridan (New York: Vintage Books, 1995), p. 30.Google Scholar
  21. 36.
    Elizabeth Fowler, “Civil Death and the Maiden: Agency and the Conditions of Contract in Piers Plowman,” Speculum 70.4 (1995): 764 [760–92].Google Scholar
  22. 38.
    Carol Gilligan, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
  23. 43.
    Virginia Woolf, A Room of One’s Own (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1929), esp. pp. 96–114.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bonnie Wheeler 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth Robertson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations