Advertisement

E. H. Carr pp 145-161 | Cite as

E.H. Carr, the Cold War and the Soviet Union

  • Hillel Ticktin

Abstract

As Michael Cox has argued in the introduction, Carr played a critical intellectual role in the post-war period as sympathetic analyst of the early Soviet regime and credible critic of the West. For both these related misdemeanours he was frequently taken to task and attacked by his many enemies. Nor have the critics gone away and, following the publication of his biography by Jonathan Haslam (a fair but not fawning account of Carr’s life), they once more emerged from the woodwork.1 Indeed, one of the most striking things about the various reviews, with one or two notable exceptions, was that they virtually ignored the book but attacked Carr in person for being, amongst other things, a ‘coldblooded colossus’, a ‘turgid’ writer more likely to turn people off history than onto it, a ‘very cold fish’ who had no interest in human beings, and a ‘horrible history man’ whose work on the former USSR was now obsolete but who unfortunately did not live long enough to see the object of his fascination disintegrate in 1991. Even in death Carr appears to have the capacity to rile those with whom he had disagreed when alive.2

Keywords

Communist Party Russian Revolution Bolshevik Revolution Soviet Study Marxist Concept 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Jonathan Haslam, Vices of Integrity: E.H. Carr, 1892–1982 (London: Verso, 1999).Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Tamara Deutscher, ‘E.H. Carr — A Personal Memoir’, New Left Review, No. 137 (January–February 1983), p. 84.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    For my analysis of the former USSR see Hillel Ticktin, Origins of the Crisis in the USSR (Armonk: Myron Sharpe, 1992).Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    See M. Cox, ‘The Cold War as a System’, Critique, No. 17, 1986, pp. 17–82.Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    Isaac Deutscher, The Great Contest (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1960).Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    E.H. Carr, ‘Stalin Victorious’, in F. Mount, ed., Communism (London: Harvill, 1992) pp. 83–92.Google Scholar
  7. 10.
    E.H. Carr, What is History?, second edition (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1987).Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    Norman Stone, ‘Grim Eminence’, London Review of Books, 20 January 1983, pp. 3–8.Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    E.H. Carr, Bolshevik Revolution, Vol. 2 (London: Penguin, 1966), pp. 284–6.Google Scholar
  10. 14.
    R. Pipes, Russia under the Bolshevik Regime, 199–1924 (London: Harper Collins, 1994), p. 410, footnote.Google Scholar
  11. 20.
    L. Schapiro, ‘Totalitarianism in the Doghouse’, in Leonard Schapiro, ed., Political Opposition in One Party States (London: Macmillan, 1972), p. 276.Google Scholar
  12. 21.
    E.H. Carr, Michael Bakunin (London: Macmillan, 1937), p. 440.Google Scholar
  13. 28.
    See my ‘Soviet Studies and the Collapse of the USSR: In Defence of Marxism’, in Michael Cox Rethinking the Soviet Collapse: Sovietology, the Death of Communism and the New Russia (London: Cassell, 1998), pp. 73–94.Google Scholar
  14. 30.
    O. Figes, A People’s Tragedy, The Russian Revolution 1891–1924 (London: Jonathan Cape, 1996), pp. 802–3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hillel Ticktin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations