Advertisement

E. H. Carr pp 198-216 | Cite as

E.H. Carr and the Quest for Moral Revolution in International Relations

  • Paul Rich

Abstract

E.H. Carr has generally been viewed by analysts of International Relations to be a pioneer of the ‘scientific’ study of the discipline as well as an important theorist of state-centric ‘realism’. His book The Twenty Years’ Crisis has traditionally been considered one of the major texts that helped shape post-war realism, especially in the United States.1 However, the significance of this text in the broader development of Carr’s thinking on International Relations has been seriously neglected by analysts, who have tended to conclude that Carr was an advocate of raison d’état in which ethics was largely a product of power.2 This view has also been reinforced by the sharp distinction Carr made in The Twenty Years’ Crisis between the school of state-centric realism and that of Utopian idealism, which was accused of having little understanding of the role of power in international politics and of confusing prescription with description.3

Keywords

Foreign Policy International Relation World Politics International Politics Liberal Idealist 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    K.W. Thompson, Political Realism and the Crisis of World Politics (New York: John Wiley, 1960), p. 25Google Scholar
  2. Martin Wight, ‘Western Values in International Relations’, in M. Wight et al., eds, Diplomatic Investigations (London: Allen and Unwin, 1966), p. 121.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    See, for instance, Justin Rosenberg, The Empire of Civil Society (London: Verso 1994), pp. 10–15Google Scholar
  4. Scott Burchill, ‘Realism and Neo Realism’, in Scott Burchill and Andrew Linklater, eds, Theories of International Relations (Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 1996), pp. 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 3.
    E.H. Carr, The Twenty Years’ Crisis (London: Macmillan, 1966).Google Scholar
  6. 4.
    D. Long and P. Wilson, eds, Thinkers of The Twenty Years’ Crisis (Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  7. 11.
    D. Caute, The Fellow Travellers (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1973), pp. 5–6.Google Scholar
  8. 12.
    E.H. Carr, Karl Marx: A Study in Fanaticism (London: Dent, 1934), p. 302.Google Scholar
  9. 14.
    K. Martin, Father Figures (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1966), p. 190.Google Scholar
  10. 15.
    For details of Mannheim’s influence in England see Wolf Lepenies, Between Literature and Science: the Rise of Sociology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), pp. 328–33.Google Scholar
  11. 16.
    K. Mannheim, Ideology and Utopia (London: Kegan Paul 1940).Google Scholar
  12. Karl Mannheim, Man and Society in an Age of Reconstruction (London: Kegan Paul, 1940), p. 75.Google Scholar
  13. 17.
    H.S. Hughes, Consciousness and Society (London: Paladin, 1974), pp. 418–27.Google Scholar
  14. 18.
    C. Jones, ‘Carr, Mannheim and a Post-Positivist Science of International Relations’, Political Studies, Vol. XLV 1997, esp. pp. 236–8.Google Scholar
  15. 20.
    G.W. Egerton, ‘Collective Security as a Political Myth: Liberal Internationalism and the League of Nations in Politics and History’, The International History Review, Vol. V, No. 4, November 1983, pp. 496–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 21.
    S. Adler, The Isolationist Impulse (New York: Collier Books, 1961), pp. 55–62.Google Scholar
  17. S. Adler, The Uncertain Giant 1921–1941 (London: Collier Books, 1965), p. 5.Google Scholar
  18. 23.
    E.H. Carr, Britain: A Study of Foreign Policy from the Versailles Treaty to the Outbreak of War (London: Longman, Green and Co., 1939), p. 16.Google Scholar
  19. 24.
    H. Bull, ‘The Theory of International Politics, 1919–1969’ in B. Porter, ed., The Aberystwyth Papers (London, 1972), p. 37.Google Scholar
  20. 27.
    M. Wight, Power Politics (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1986), p. 214.Google Scholar
  21. 28.
    See in particular Carr’s inaugural lecture at Aberystwyth reprinted as E.H. Carr, ‘Public Opinion as a Safeguard of Peace’, International Affairs, XV, 6 (November–December 1936), pp. 846–62.Google Scholar
  22. 32.
    P. Drucker, The End of Economic Man (London: Heinemann, 1939)Google Scholar
  23. 33.
    E.H. Carr, The Conditions of Peace (London: Macmillan, 1942), pp. 24–5.Google Scholar
  24. 35.
    T.W. Arnold, The Folklore of Capitalism (Garden City: Blue Ribbon Books, 1941), p. 378Google Scholar
  25. 37.
    H. Thomas, Armed Truce: The Beginnings of the Cold War, 1945–46 (London: Sceptre, 1988), p. 260.Google Scholar
  26. 40.
    P. Drucker The Future of Industrial Man (London: Heinemann, 1943), p. 53.Google Scholar
  27. 42.
    F.A. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom (Routledge, 1944), p. 16.Google Scholar
  28. see A. Gamble, Hayek (London: Polity Press, 1996), pp. 16–21.Google Scholar
  29. 46.
    E.H. Carr, The Soviet Impact on the Western World (London: Macmillan, 1946), pp. 2–3.Google Scholar
  30. 49.
    R. V. Daniels, The End of the Communist Revolution (London and New York: Routledge, 1993), p. 90.Google Scholar
  31. 51.
    On the foundation of the Soviet model of planning see E.H. Carr, The Bolshevik Revolution, Volume 2 (London: Macmillan, 1952), chapter 20.Google Scholar
  32. E.H. Carr, ‘Editor’s Introduction’ in N. Bukharin and E. Preobrazhensky, The ABC of Communism (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1969), p. 51.Google Scholar
  33. 54.
    For a view of the Cold War as a clash of rival systems see F. Halliday, Rethinking International Relations (London: I.B. Tauris, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 55.
    N. Berdayev, The End of Our Time (London: Sheed and Ward, 1933), p. 39.Google Scholar
  35. See, for example, R.C. Mowat, Climax of History (London: Blandford Press, 1951), p. 153.Google Scholar
  36. 57.
    Z. Laidi, Power and Purpose After the Cold War (Oxford: Berg, 1994).Google Scholar
  37. 58.
    For details of Monnet’s influence see F. Duchene, Jean Monnet (New York: Norton, 1994), pp. 147–80.Google Scholar
  38. 59.
    A. Milward, The European Rescue of the Nation State (London: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar
  39. 60.
    E.H. Carr, ‘Moral’, in E.L. Woodward et al., eds, Foundations of World Order (Denver: University of Denver Press, 1949), pp. 55–75.Google Scholar
  40. 61.
    A. Zimmern, ‘The Decline of International Standards’, International Affairs, Vol. XV11 January–February 1938 pp. 3–31.Google Scholar
  41. 62.
    See, for instance, J.H. Herz, ‘Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma’, World Politics, July 1950, pp. 176–7.Google Scholar
  42. 63.
    H. Rauschnigg, The Revolution of Nihilism (New York, 1933).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Rich

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations