Advertisement

Acknowledging the Past in Donne’s Ignatius His Conclave

  • Anita Gilman Sherman

Abstract

If in The Anniversaries and The Winter’s Tale, both Donne and Shakespeare test the contours of skepticism by mourning an unknown woman and repudiating the past, in the next pairing of texts, they continue their philosophical forays by turning to history and its gallery of “Equivocal men” (27).1 Instead of finding solace in silent wonder over strange facts or resorting to the strenuous aestheticization of wit, in their return to history both Donne and Shakespeare seek release from a cacophony of voices whose competing claims produce uncertainty. Stanley Cavell has made discerning remarks about “the intractableness of the past” and “the consciousness that history will not go away, except through our perfect acknowledgment of it (in particular, our acknowledgment that it is not past).”2 In the following two chapters, I argue that Shakespeare and Donne try to make history go away by perfectly acknowledging it; they share a need to exorcise the past, although they take different approaches. In his satirical polemic, Ignatius His Conclave, Donne at once enacts and condemns a skeptical aesthetic even as he tries to salvage a skeptical ethic from its blistering, intellectual rampage. He adopts rhetorical forms associated with skepticism while disowning the aestheticizing tendencies of its skeptical characters. In the process, Ignatius explores the challenges of arriving at consensus and of imagining political alternatives. In Henry VIII or All Is True, Shakespeare (with Fletcher) also adopts a skeptical aesthetic in hopes of helping us to imagine a present free from the burdens of the past.

Keywords

Collective Memory Personal Memory General Council Henry VIII Humane Infirmity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Stanley Cavell, Contesting Tears: The Hollywood Drama of the Unknown Woman ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996 ), 84;Google Scholar
  2. Stanley Cavell, Must We Mean What We Say? rev. ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), xxxiii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ivo Kamps, Historiography and Ideology in Stuart Drama ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996 ), 5.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    David Harris Willson, King James VI and I ( New York: Oxford University Press, 1956 ), 235.Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    See Willem Heijting and Paul R. Sellin, “John Donne’s Conclave Ignati: The Continental Quarto and Its Printing,” HLQ 62, nos. 3–4 (2001): 401–21.Google Scholar
  6. 12.
    Northrup Frye, Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957), 309, 310, 311.Google Scholar
  7. 14.
    W. Scott Blanchard, Scholars’ Bedlam: Menippean Satire in the Renaissance (Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 1995). Blanchard calls the mock encomium “an important sub-genre” of Menippean satire, citing Annette Tomarken’s classification of it as a countergenre“ (16).Google Scholar
  8. 15.
    Lucian, Works, trans. A. M. Harmon (London: William Heinemann, 1913), 1:279.Google Scholar
  9. 16.
    See Craig R. Thompson, The Translations of Lucian by Erasmus and St. Thomas More ( Ithaca, NY: Cornell Studies in English, 1940 ), 28.Google Scholar
  10. 17.
    Maria Katharina Carrig, “Skepticism and the Rhetoric of Renaissance Comedy” ( PhD diss., Yale University, 1995 ), 4.Google Scholar
  11. 19.
    Desiderius Erasmus, The Essential Erasmus, ed. John P. Dolan ( New York: New American Library, 1964 ), 138.Google Scholar
  12. 21.
    William Empson, Essays on Renaissance Literature: Donne and the New Philosophy, ed. John Haffenden (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 81, 76–77.Google Scholar
  13. 26.
    Citations are from Niccolà Machiavelli, The Discourses, ed. and trans. Leslie J. Walker ( London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1950 ).Google Scholar
  14. 30.
    Robert Weimann, “Society and the Uses of Authority in Shakespeare,” in Shakespeare, Man of the Theater, ed. Kenneth Muir, Jay L. Halio and D. J. Palmer (Newark, NJ: Halio and D. J. 1983 ), 182–99, 186.Google Scholar
  15. 31.
    Lawrence Stone, The Crisis of the Aristocracy 1558–1641, abridged ed. ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967 ), 16.Google Scholar
  16. 32.
    J. P. Sommerville, Royalists and Patriots: Politics and Ideology in England 1603–1640 ( London: Longman, 1999 ), 103.Google Scholar
  17. 33.
    Myron P. Gilmore, The World of Humanism, 1453–1517 ( New York: Harper, 1962 ), 215.Google Scholar
  18. 35.
    Annabel Patterson, “All Donne,” in Soliciting Interpretation: Literary Theory and Seventeenth-Century English Poetry, ed. Elizabeth D. Harvey and Katharine Eisaman Maus (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990), 37–67,51,50.Google Scholar
  19. 38.
    J. R. Mulryne, Introduction to Theatre and Government under the Early Stuarts, ed. J. R. Mulryne and Margaret Shewring (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 1–28, 13.Google Scholar
  20. 39.
    John Carey, John Donne: Life, Mind and Art (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981) 35, 36.Google Scholar
  21. 40.
    W. B. Patterson, King James VI and I and the Reunion of Christendom ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997 ), 69.Google Scholar
  22. 45.
    R. C. Bald, John Donne: A Life ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970 ), 283–84.Google Scholar
  23. 47.
    See Francis Oakley, The Conciliarist Tradition: Constitutionalism in the Catholic Church 1300–1870 ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003 ), 143.Google Scholar
  24. 50.
    Richard Field, Fifth Booke of the Church (London: n.p., 1610), 377–78, cited in W. B. Patterson, King James VI and 1, 119.Google Scholar
  25. 52.
    See William J. Bouwsma, Venice and the Defense of Republican Liberty ( Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968 ), 571.Google Scholar
  26. 55.
    John Donne, Essays in Divinity, ed. Evelyn M. Simpson ( Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1952 ), 8.Google Scholar
  27. 58.
    Thomas H. Luxon, Literal Figures: Puritan Allegory and the Reformation Crisis in Representation ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995 ), 22.Google Scholar
  28. 59.
    See Bernard J. Verkamp, The Indifferent Mean: Adiaphorism in the English Reformation to 1554 (Athens: Ohio University Press; Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1977 ), 24.Google Scholar
  29. 61.
    James VI and I, Political Writings, ed. Johann P. Sommerville ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994 ), 129.Google Scholar
  30. 63.
    John Guillory, “’To Please the Wiser Sort’: Violence and Philosophy in Hamlet,” in Historicism, Psychoanalysis, and Early Modern Culture, ed. Carla Mazzio and Douglas Trevor (London: Routledge, 2000), 82–109, 87.Google Scholar
  31. 66.
    Geoffrey H. Hartman, The Longest Shadow: In the Aftermath of the Holocaust ( Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996 ), 28.Google Scholar
  32. 68.
    See, e.g., Richard Strier, Resistant Structures: Particularity, Radicalism, and Renaissance Texts (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995), and Scodel, Excess and the Mean, op cit.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Anita Gilman Sherman 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anita Gilman Sherman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations