Striking First pp 193-202 | Cite as

The Prospects for American Hegemony

  • Robert Jervis


From “Understanding the Bush Doctrine” by Robert Jervis from Political Science Quarterly, v. 118, no. 3, dated 2003, pages 365 through 388.


Foreign Policy Nuclear Weapon National Interest World Order International Politics 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 4.
    See David Reynolds, From Munich to Pearl Harbor: Roosevelt’s America and the Origins of the Second World War (Chicago: Dee, 2001)Google Scholar
  2. Warren Kimball, The Juggler: Franklin Roosevelt as Wartime Statesman (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    Melvyn Leffler, A Preponderance of Power: National Security, the Truman Administration, and the Cold War (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
  4. Thomas Christensen, Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, and Sino-American Conflict, 19471958 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  5. For the domestically-imposed limits on this process, see Aaron Friedberg, In the Shadow of the Garrison State: America’s Anti-Statism and Its Cold War Grand Strategy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Michael Hogan, A Cross of Iron: Harry S. Truman and the Origins of the National Security State, 19451954 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    Geir Lunstestad, “Empire by Invitation? The United States and Western Europe, 1945–1952,” Journal of ‘Peace Research, 23 (September 1986): 263–277Google Scholar
  8. James McAllister, No Exit: America and the German Problem, 1943–1954 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
  9. 7.
    Charles Maier, Search of Stability: Explorations in Historical Political Economy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987), 148Google Scholar
  10. John Lewis Gaddis, We Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
  11. Thomas Risse-Kappen, Cooperation Among Democracies: The European Influence on U.S. Foreign Policy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  12. 8.
    William Wohlforth, “The Stability of a Unipolar World,” International Security, 24 (Summer 1999): 5–41Google Scholar
  13. Kenneth Waltz, “Structural Realism After the Cold War,” International Security, 25 (Summer 2000): 5–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. For Robert Kudrle argument see Robert Kudrle, “Hegemony Strikes Out: The U.S. Global Role in Anti-Trust, Tax Evasion, and Illegal Immigration,” International Studies Perspectives, 4 (February 2003): 52–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 9.
    Michael Mastanduno, “Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy after the Cold War,” International Security, 21 (Spring 1997): 49–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Michael Mastundo, “Correspondence: Debating the Unipolar Moment,” International Security, 22, no. 3 (Winter 1997/1998): 168–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 10.
    G. John Ikenberry, “After September 11: America’s Grand Strategy and International Order in the Age of Terror,” Survival, 43 (Winter 2001–2002): 19–34Google Scholar
  18. G. John Ikenberry, Afler Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order Afler Major War (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
  19. John Gerard Ruggie, Winning the Peace: America and the New World Order (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
  20. Joseph Nye, The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t Go It Alone (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
  21. John Steinbrunner, Principles of Global Security (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2000).Google Scholar
  22. 11.
    Quoted in James Harding, “Conflicting Views From Two Bush Camps,” Financial Times, March 20, 2003Google Scholar
  23. for a perceptive analysis, see Frank Bruni, “For President, a Mission and a Role in History,” New York Times, September 22, 2001, 1.Google Scholar
  24. 12.
    Richard Betts, “The Soft Underbelly of American Primacy: Tactical Advantages of Terror,” Political Science Quarterly, 117 (Spring 2002): 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 17.
    See, for example, Fareed Zakaria, “Realism and Domestic Politics: A Review Essay,” International Security, 17 (Summer 1992): 177–198Google Scholar
  26. Robert Tucker, The Radical left and American Foreign Policy (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1971), 69–77, 106–111.Google Scholar
  27. 21.
    John Mueller, “The Catastrophe Quota: Trouble after the Cold War,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 38 (September 1994): 355–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frederick Hartmann, The Conservation of Enemies: A Study in Enmity (Westport: Greenwood Press, 1982).Google Scholar
  29. 22.
    John S. Galbraith, “The ‘Turbulent Frontier’ as a Factor in British Expansion,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 2 (January 1960): 34–48Google Scholar
  30. 23.
    Dale C. Copeland, Origins of Major War (Cornell: Cornell University Press, 2001); John J. Mearsheimer, Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: WW. Norton, 2002).Google Scholar
  31. 25.
    Robert Jervis, “Theories of War in an Era of Leading Power Peace,” American Political Science Review, 96(March 2003): 1–14.Google Scholar
  32. 26.
    Bush, “Speech at West Point.” The Wolfowitz draft is summarized in the New York Times, 8 March and 24 May 1992Google Scholar
  33. A fuller unclassified version is Zalmay Khalilzad, From Containment to Global leadership? America and the World After the Cold War (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1995)Google Scholar
  34. also see Robert Kagan and William Kristol, eds., Present Dangers: Crisis and Opportunity in American Foreign and Defense Policy (San Francisco: Encounter Books, 2000).Google Scholar
  35. 27.
    Quoted in Robert W Seton-Watson, Disraeli, Gladstone, and the Eastern Question (New York: Norton, 1972), 222.Google Scholar
  36. 28.
    Kenneth Waltz, The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More May Be Better (London: IISS, Adelphi Paper no. 171, 1981)Google Scholar
  37. Scott Sagan and Kenneth Waltz, The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate Renewed (New York: Norton, 2003).Google Scholar
  38. or a range of views, see Marc Trachtenberg, “Waltzing to Armageddon?” National Interest, no. 69 (Fall 2002): 144–155Google Scholar
  39. Eric Herring, Preventing the Use of Weapons of Mass Destruction (New York: Frank Cass, 2000)Google Scholar
  40. T.V. Paul, Richard Harknett, and James Wirtz, The Absolute Weapon Revisited: Nuclear Arms and the Emerging International Order (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  41. 29.
    Quoted in David Sanger, “A New View of Where America Fits in the World,” New York Times, February 18, 2001, 1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Betty Glad and Chris J. Dolan 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Jervis

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations