Advertisement

Renaissance Household Goddesses

Fertility, Politics, and the Gendering of the Spectatorship
Chapter

Abstract

During the Renaissance, Florentine patricians began to litter their homes with luxury goods, engaging in a broad pattern of consumption that has been called “display culture.” This essay addresses a curious and hitherto ignored feature of this visual and material economy: the private display of mass-produced glazed terracotta statuettes. Many of these domestic works represented important political iconographies (for example, Judith and Holofernes and David). In this essay, I focus on one iconographic strain in this genre: private representations of Donatello’s lost Dovizia, a statue erected in 1429 in the Mercato Vecchio, Florence’s ancient “forum.”

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 5.
    Marquand; Hans Kauffman, Donatello: Eine Einfihrung in sein Bilden und Denken ( Berlin: G. Grote, 1935 ), 41–42.Google Scholar
  2. 6.
    David G. Wilkins, “Donatello’s Lost Dovizia for the Mercato Vecchio: Wealth and Charity as Florentine Civic Virtues,” Art Bulletin 65 (1983): 401–23;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Masahiko Mori, “First Public Sculpture in the Early Renaissance Florence—Donatello’s Lost Dovizia,” Bijutsu shigaku 6 (1984): 39–71 article in Japanese with English summary, 61–63; I would like to thank Allen Hockley for helping me with the Japanese);Google Scholar
  4. Sarah Blake Wilk [McHam], “Donatello’s Dovizia as an Image of Florentine Political Propoganda,” Artibus et Historiae 6 (1986): 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 7.
    Jürgen Habermas, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, trans. Thomas Burger (London: Polity Press, 1989 ), 28.Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    Robert C. Davis, “The Geography of Gender in Renaissance Italy,” in Gender and Society in Renaissance Italy, ed. Judith C. Brown and Robert C. Davis ( London and New York: Longmans, 1998 ), 19–38.Google Scholar
  7. 11.
    See Lauro Martines, “A Way of Looking at Women in Renaissance Florence,” The Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 4 (1974): 15–28;Google Scholar
  8. and Joan Kelly-Gadol, “Did Women Have a Renaissance?” in Becoming Visible: Women in European History, ed. Renate Bridenthal and Claudia Koonz (Boston: Houghton, 1977 ), 137–64.Google Scholar
  9. On judicial injustices, see Thomas Kuehn, “‘Cum consensu mundualdi’: Legal Guardianship of Women in Quattrocento Florence,” Viator 13 (1982): 309–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. On the diminution of women’s public roles see also Samuel Cohn, “Donne in piazza e donne in tribunale a Firenze nel Rinascimento,” Studi storici 22 (1981): 515–33.Google Scholar
  11. 20.
    Paolo Berdini, “Women under the Gaze: A Renaissance Genealogy,” Art History 21, no. 4 (1998): 565–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 24.
    Jacqueline Marie Musacchio, The Art and Ritual of Childbirth in Renaissance Italy ( New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1999 ).Google Scholar
  13. 26.
    See Louis Haas, The Renaissance Man and His Children (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998), esp. 48–57.Google Scholar
  14. 34.
    Johann Joachim Winckelmann, Geschichte der Kunst des Altertums ( Dresden: Waltherischen Hof-Buchhandlung, 1764 ), 167–68.Google Scholar
  15. 35.
    E. H. Gombrich, Aby Warburg: An Intellectual Biography ( London: The Warburg Institute, 1970 ), 123.Google Scholar
  16. 43.
    Adrian Randolph, “Performing the Bridal Body in Fifteenth-Century Florence,” Art History 21 (1998): 182–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Anne L. McClanan and Karen Rosoff Encarnación 2002

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations