Representing Women on Roman Sarcophagi



How people are commemorated in death tends to say more about society’s expectations than about them as individuals; major life experiences and personal characteristics are usually presented in terms that relate to the ideals and aspirations of the age. Roman women were no exception. More often than not the imagery used in their memorials represented their personal experiences in terms of what contemporary society valued in women, so that we learn more about what their roles were expected to be than what they experienced first hand. This essay looks at some ways in which women and their lives were depicted on sarcophagi from imperial Rome. As funerary memorials, the scenes carved on these sarcophagi provide many examples of women depicted in conventional social roles, as wives and mothers within the family. These reflect and reaffirm the qualities expected of elite women in contemporary Roman society, where their sexuality and ability to bear children were vital to the continuation of the family. Yet sarcophagi also include images that offer alternative views of Roman womanhood, where women appear to transgress accepted social roles, particularly in terms of power and gender. Some of these images are interestingly, if not uniquely different from the rest because they were formed in the production and usage of the sarcophagi themselves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. G. Koch and H. Sichtermann, Römische Sarkophage. Handbuch der Archäologie ( Munich: Oscar Beck, 1982 ).Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    E. D’Ambra, “The cult of virtues and the funerary relief of Ulpia Epigone,” in Roman Art in Context. An Anthology, ed. E. D’Ambra ( Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1993 ), 110.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    The fact that the legal minimum age for marriage was 12 for girls may have meant that some girls were socially adult despite a young biological age. In comparison, note images of small children that scarcely differentiate between girls and boys: for example, see J Huskinson, Roman Children’s Sarcophagi: Their Decoration and Its Social Significance, Oxford Monographs on Classical Archaeology (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996 ), 115;Google Scholar
  4. and D. E. E. Kleiner and S. B. Matheson, I Claudia. Women in Ancient Rome (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996), nos. 147 and 148.Google Scholar
  5. 12.
    S. Treggiari, Roman marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the time of Cicero to the time of Ulpian ( Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991 ), 164–65.Google Scholar
  6. 13.
    As discussed, for example, in the studies by H. Wrede, Consecratio in formam deorum: vergöttliche Privatpersonen in der römischen Kaiserzeit (Mainz: von Zabern, 1981 );Google Scholar
  7. D. E. E. Kleiner, Roman imperial Funerary altars with portraits, Archaeologica 62 (Rome: Bretschneider,1987); and E. D’Ambra, “The cult of virtues and the funerary relief of Ulpia Epigone,” 104–114.Google Scholar
  8. 14.
    K. Fittschen, “Zum Kleobis- und Biton-Relief in Venedig,” Jahrbuch des deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 85 (1970): 171–93, here 187.Google Scholar
  9. 16.
    M. Koortbojian, Myth, Meaning, and Memory on Roman Sarcophagi ( Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995 ), 9.Google Scholar
  10. 23.
    B. Andreae, Die römischen Jagdsarkophage, Die antiken Sarkophagreliefs, ed. C. Robert 1:2 (Berlin: Mann, 1980), no. 232; Koch and Sichtermann, Römische, fig. 109.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Anne L. McClanan and Karen Rosoff Encarnación 2002

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations