Advertisement

Super Slacker Girls: Dropping Out but Divinely Inspired

  • Michele Paule

Abstract

Generation X, Generation Y, post-boomers, Border Youth, slackers. Marketing mandarins and cultural theorists alike have invented names and identified characteristics of the generation of youth who just cannot be bothered.1 I identify a variation on the theme, a short-lived phenomenon lounging on the millennial cusp, born out of unique conditions within the culture and the industry that produced her—the super slacker girl.

Keywords

Young Woman Popular Culture Popular Television Happy Time Performative Nature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    See for example, Linda Morton, “Targeting Generation X,” Public Relations Quarterly 48.4 (2003): 43–45Google Scholar
  2. Robert Miklititsch, “Gen-X TV: Political-Lividinal Structures of Feeling in Melrose Place,” Journal of Film and Video 55.1 (2003). 16–30.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    Laurie Ouliette, “Victims No More: Postfeminism, Television and Ally McBeal,” Communication Review 5 (2002): 315–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    Rachel Mosely, “The Teen Series,” in The Television Genre Book, ed. G. Creeber (London: BFI, 2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carol. S. Dweck, Self Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality and Development, (Philadelphia: Psychology Press Taylor & Francis, 2000)Google Scholar
  6. C. J. Cimister, “Bright Girls Who Fail: The Limitations of the Active Passive Learner,” Gifted Education International 20.1 (2005): 88–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    Barbara Kerr, Smart Girls: A New Psychology of Girls, Women and Giftedness (Scottsdale, AZ: Gifted Psychology Press, 1997), 170.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Sally M. Reis, “Internal Barriers, Personal Issues, and Decisions Faced by Gifted and Talented Females,” Gifted Child Today 1.1 (2002): 2.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rhonda Wilcox, Why Buffy Matters: The Art of Buffy the Vampire Slayer (London: I. B. Tauris, 2005).Google Scholar
  10. 12.
    Henry Giroux, “Slacking Off: Border Youth and Postmodern Education,” JAC: Journal of American Composition 14.2 (1994): 7.Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    Andrew Kopkind, “Slacking toward Bethlehem,” Grand Street Magazine, Issue 10 (1992): 87.Google Scholar
  12. 17.
    Angela McRobbie, “Post-feminism and Popular Culture,” Feminist Media Studies 4.3 (Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis, 2004), 259.Google Scholar
  13. 20.
    Kathleen Noble, The Sound of a Silver Horn: Reclaiming the Heroism in Contemporary Women’s Lives (New York: Ballantine Books, 1994), 18.Google Scholar
  14. 22.
    Rachel Mosely and Jacinda Read, “Having it Ally: Popular Television (Post-) Feminism,” Feminist Media Studies 2.2 (2002): 247.Google Scholar
  15. 25.
    Judith Butler, Gender Trouble: Feminisation and the Subversion of Identity (New York: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
  16. 26.
    Catherine Driscoll, Girls: An Analysis of Feminine Adolescence in Popular Culture (New York: Columbia University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
  17. 27.
    Carol Tavris, Mismeasurement of Women: Why Women Are Not the Better Sex, the Inferior Sex or the Opposite Sex (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1992), 324Google Scholar
  18. 28.
    Christine Battersby, Gender and Genius: Towards a Feminist Aesthetics (London: Women’s Press, 1989).Google Scholar
  19. 32.
    June Boyce-Tilman, “Unconventional Wisdom—Theologising the Margins” Feminist Theology 13.3 (2005): 317–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 35.
    Kathleen Noble, “To Thine Own Self Be True: A New Model of Female Talent Development,” Gifted Child Quarterly 43.4 (1999): 140–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sherrie A. Inness 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michele Paule

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations