Lab Coats and Lipstick: Smart Women Reshape Science on Television
Lab coats and lipstick—why not? Does science need reshaping? And if so, how can television help to do it?
KeywordsPopular Culture Male Character Science Fiction Female Character Female Scientist
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Some have claimed that science fiction’s direct engagement with science as a discourse makes it a unique genre. See Justine Larbalestier, The Battle of the Sexes in Science Fiction (Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 2002), 8Google Scholar
- Brian Attebery, Decoding Gender in Science Fiction (New York and London: Routledge, 2002), 1.Google Scholar
- 2.Jane Donawerth, Frankenstein’s Daughters: Women Writing Science Fiction (New York: Syracuse University Press, 1997), 1.Google Scholar
- 3.Marina Benjamin, ed., Science and Sensibility: Gender and Scientific Enquiry, 1780–1945 (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1991), 3.Google Scholar
- 5.Robin Roberts, “The Woman Scientist in Star Trek: Voyager,” in Future Females, The Next Generation, ed. Marleen Barr (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000), 280.Google Scholar
- 10.Evelyn Fox Keller, Secrets of Life, Secrets of Death: Essays on Language, Gender and Science (New York: Routledge, 1992), 23.Google Scholar
- 11.Jocelyn Steinke, “Cultural Representations of Gender and Science: Portrayals of Female Scientists and Engineers in Popular Film,” Science Communication 27.1 (2005): 42.Google Scholar
- 13.Janine R. Harrison, “Gender Politics in Angel: Traditional vs. Non-Traditional Corporate Climates,” in Reading Angel: The TV Spin-off with a Soul, ed. Stacey Abbott (London: I. B. Tauris, 2005), 129.Google Scholar
- 24.Linda Badley, “Scully Hits the Glass Ceiling: Postmodernism, Postfeminism, Posthumanism, and The X-Files,” in Fantasy Girls: Gender in the New Universe of Science Fiction and Fantasy Television, ed. Elyce Rae Helford (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000), 63Google Scholar
- 29.Ruth Bleier, Science and Gender: A Critique of Biology and Its Theories on Women (New York: Pergamon Press, 1984), 201.Google Scholar
- 31.Lisa Parks, “Special Agent or Monstrosity? Finding the Feminine in The X-Files,” in “Deny All Knowledge”: Reading The X-Files, ed. David Lavery, Angela Hague, and Marla Cartwright (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1996), 125.Google Scholar
- 35.Bonnie J. Dow, Prime-Time Feminism: Television, Media Culture, and the Women’s Movement since 1970 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996), 168.Google Scholar
- 43.Gillian Anderson in Sherrie A. Inness, Tough Girls: Women Warriors and Wonder Women in Popular Culture (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999), 96.Google Scholar
- 44.David Lavery, “‘Emotional Resonance and Rocket Launchers’: Joss Whedon’s Commentaries on the Buffy the Vampire Slayer DVDs and Television Creativity,” Slayage: The International Online Journal of Buffy Studies 6 (2002): 15Google Scholar
- 49.Amy Acker in Nancy Holder, Jeff Mariotte, and Maryelizabeth Hart, Angel: The Casefiles (New York: Pocket Books, 2002), 367.Google Scholar
- 50.Susan Bordo, “Reading the Slender Body,” in Body/Politics: Women and the Discourses of Science, ed. Mary Jacobus, Evelyn Fox Keller, and Sally Shuttleworth (New York: Routledge, 1990), 101.Google Scholar
- 58.Matt Hills and Rebecca Williams, “Angel’s Monstrous Mothers and Vampires with Souls: Investigating the Abject in ‘Television Horror,’” in Reading Angel: The TV Spin-off with a Soul, ed. Stacey Abbott (London: I. B. Tauris, 2005), 211.Google Scholar
© Sherrie A. Inness 2007