Gabriel d’Arboussier: Democracy Is Not a Magnificently Adorned Hall

  • Siba N. Grovogui
Part of the Culture and Religion in International Relations book series (CRIR)

Abstract

Francis Fukuyama best captured the mood following the disintegration of the Soviet Union when he forecast the coming realization of Hegel’s dream of the end of history: the final victory of liberalism and the impending advent of a global liberal order.1 This mood was one of optimism2 that the new moment would “ensure in one go political forms of justice and economic forms of production of wealth, as well as setting up interests and optimizing gains for all.”3 It was also believed that liberal democracies would “deliver” peace and good governance everywhere, including where they had not taken roots. This basic idea was given a boost by President George H. W. Bush who, upon waging a war to reverse the 1990 Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait, proclaimed the advent of a new world order based on multi-lateral and peaceful resolutions of international conflicts; prohibition of territorial occupations; preventive interventions in destabilizing nationalist disputes. Caught up in the exuberance, Michael W. Doyle envisaged the emerging union of the great classical doctrines of democracy and liberal forms as legitimating devices of both internal and foreign policies.4 The democratic peace theory was intended to not only supplant realist commonsense about the nature and telos of international relations, it was to dispense with the tenets of state Marxism and so-called third world structuralism—embodied inter alia by the theories of neocolonialism, dependency, and imperialism.

Keywords

Europe Dien Egypt Defend Doyle 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Francis Fukuyama, The End of History and the Last Man (New York: Perennial, 2002).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    This optimism suffered a blow on September 11, 2001 upon the terrorist attacks in the United States, which were followed by U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. In turn, this setback has provided fodder to those opened to Samuel P. Huntington’s view of an impend-ing clash of civilizations. See Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon & Schuster, c. 1996).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jacques Rancière, Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy, trans. Julie Rose (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999), vii, viii.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Bruce Fetter, ed., Colonial Rule in Africa: Readings from Primary Sources (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1979), 96–98.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Thomas Francis Power, Jules Ferry and the Renaissance of French Imperialism (New York: King’s Crown Press, 1944).Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    David W. Dent, The Legacy of the Monroe Doctrine: A Reference Guide to U.S. Involvement in Latin America and the Caribbean (Westport, CT-Greenwood Press, 1999)Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    Jurgen Habermas, “Why Europe Needs a Constitution,” New Left Review, vol. 11 (2001), 5–6. See also Edmund Husserl, The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Philosophy, trans. David Carr (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970), 281–285.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    See, for instance, Emile Durkheim, The Rules of Sociological Method, trans. W. D. Halls (London: Macmillan Press, 1982).Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    See, for instance, Sam Whimster, The Essential Weber: A Reader (London: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    Ronald H. Chilcote, Theories of Comparative Political Economy (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2000).Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    See, for instance, Clifford Geertz, Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology (New York: Basic Books, 1983).Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    Marcel Detienne, “Murderous Identity: Anthropology, History, and the Art of Constructing Comparables,” Common Knowledge, vol. 8, no. 1 (2002), 178–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 16.
    Walter Benjamin, Illuminations, Hannah Arendt, ed. (New York: Schocken Books, 1969), 69–82.Google Scholar
  14. 20.
    See, for instance, Michael C. Williams, “The Discipline of the Democratic Peace: Kant, Liberalism, and the Social Construction of Security Communities,” European Journal of International Relations, vol. 7, no. 4 (2001), 525–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 21.
    Charles W. Kegley, Jr., “The Neoidealist Moment in International Studies? Realist Myths and the New International Realities,” International Studies iarterly, vol. 37, no. 2 (June 1993), 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 22.
    Stanley Hoffmann, The Ethics and Politics of Humanitarian Intervention (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  17. 23.
    Michael Doyle, “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 12, no. 4 (Autumn, 1983), 323–353.Google Scholar
  18. 24.
    Jean Bethke Elshtain, “What Morality Got to Do With It? Making the Right Distinctions,” Social Philosophy and Policy, vol. 21, no. 1 (2004), 1–13 and Just War Against Terror: The Burden of American Power in a Violent World (New York: Basic Books, c. 2003).Google Scholar
  19. 25.
    Christopher Layne, “Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace,” International Security, vol. 19, no. 2 (1994), 5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 26.
    John Owen, “How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace,” International Security, vol. 19, no. 2 (1994), 87–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 27.
    James Lee Ray, Democracy and International Conflict: An Evaluation of the Democratic Peace Propositin (Colombia: University of South Carolina Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  22. 32.
    Thomas Risse-Kappen, ed., Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-state Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 492.Google Scholar
  23. 39.
    James Lorimer, The Institutes of Law: A Treatise of the Jural Relations of Separate Political Communities (London: Blackwood, 1883).Google Scholar
  24. 44.
    Tarak Barkawi and Mark Laffey, “The Imperial Peace: Democracy, Force, and Globalization,” European Journal of International Relations, vol. 5, no. 4 (1999), 403–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 45.
    Uday S. Mehta, “Liberal Strategies of Exclusion,” in Frederick Cooper and Ann Laura Stoler, eds., Tensions of Empire (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997), 59–86Google Scholar
  26. 46.
    Pheng Cheah and Bruce Robbins, eds., Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling Beyond the Nation (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1998), 1–41.Google Scholar
  27. 47.
    Joshua Cohen, ed., For Love of Country: Debating the Limits of Patriotism (Boston: Beacon Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  28. 48.
    See, for instance, Barry Holden, ed., Global Democracy: Key Debates (London: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar
  29. 49.
    Andrew Linklater, “Men and Citizens in International Relations,” Review of International Studies, vol. 7 (1981), 23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 57.
    See, specifically, David Held, ed., Prospects for Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993); and Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  31. 60.
    Andrew Linklater, “The Problem of Community in International Relations,” Alternatives, vol. xv (1990), 141.Google Scholar
  32. 65.
    See, for instance, Martha C. Nussbaum, Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. with Jonathan Glover, eds., Women, Culture, and Development: A Study of Human Capabilities (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  34. 66.
    Chris Brown, “International Political Theory and the Idea of International Community,” in Ken Booth and Steve Smith, eds., International Relations Theory Today (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995), 90–101Google Scholar
  35. 71.
    Stanley Hoffmann, The Ethics and Politics of Humanitarian Intervention (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  36. 72.
    Robert H. Jackson, Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Third World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 202.Google Scholar
  37. 74.
    Roger D. Hansen, Beyond the North-South Stalemate (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979).Google Scholar
  38. 75.
    Chris Brown, “The Modern Requirement: Reflections on Normative International Theory in a Post-Western World,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 17, no. 2 (1988), 339–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 76.
    See, for instance, David Gillies, Between Principle and Practice: Human Rights in North-South Relations (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
  40. Charles AJones, The North-South dialogue: A Brief History (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1983)Google Scholar
  41. Jagdish N. Bhagwati and John Gerard Ruggie, Power, Passions, and Purpose: Prospects for North-South Negotiations (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1984).Google Scholar
  42. 82.
    Boutros Boutros-Ghali, “An Agenda for Democratization at the International Level,” in Barry Holden, ed., Global Democracy: Key Debates (London: Routledge, 2000), 105–124.Google Scholar
  43. 83.
    Daniele Archibugi, Sveva Balduini, and Marco Donati, “The United Nations as an Agency of Global Democracy,” in Barry Holden, ed., Global Democracy: Key Debates (London: Routledge, 2000), 125–161.Google Scholar
  44. 85.
    Frederick Cooper, Decolonization and African society: The Labor Question in French and British Africa (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 86.
    John Darwin, Britain and Decolonization: The Retreat from Empire in the Post-War World (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 90.
    Frederic C. Schaffer, Democracy in Translation: Understanding Politics in an Unfamiliar Culture (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  47. 96.
    Mamadou Dia, “Le Point IV Truman ou le Capitalisme s’Humanisant,” Condition Humaine (February 11, 1950).Google Scholar
  48. 100.
    Mahmood Mamdani, Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  49. 106.
    Catherine Akpo-Vaché, L’AOF et la Seconde Guerre Mondiale (Paris: Karthala, 1996), 205–272.Google Scholar
  50. 110.
    Ruth Schachter-Morgenthau, Le Multipartisme en Afrique de l’Ouest Francophone Jusqu’aux Indépendances (Paris: l’Harmattan, 1998), 53–54.Google Scholar
  51. 140.
    Etienne Djaument, “Projet de loi relatif a l’élection des conseillers de la République,” Journal Officiel, no. 85 (September 15, 1948), 3077.Google Scholar
  52. 155.
    Boubou Hama, “Audition de M. Bollaert, Haut Commissaire Indochine,” Annales de l’Assemblée de l’Union Française, no. 10 (January 1, 1947), 68.Google Scholar
  53. 156.
    Boubou Hama, “Débats sur un incident,” Annales de l’Assemblée de l’Union Française, no. 21 (March 11, 1949), 360.Google Scholar
  54. 158.
    Boubou Hama, “Propositions concernant les rangs de préséances à l’Assemblée de l’Union Française,” Annales de l’Assemblée de l’Union Française (February 4, 1949), 72.Google Scholar
  55. 163.
    Boubou Hama, “Projet de loi portant création d’une Assemblée territoriale élue en Cochinchine,” Annales de l’Assemblée de l’Union Française, nos. 19, 20, and 21 (March 1949), 334.Google Scholar
  56. 175.
    Gabriel Lisette, “Politique Étrangère du Gouvernement,” Assemblée Nationale, 2eme séance (March 11, 1948), 1653.Google Scholar
  57. 195.
    Gabriel Lisette, “Politique Étrangère du Gouvernement,” Assemblée Nationale, 2eme séance (March 11, 1948), 1563.Google Scholar
  58. 199.
    Walter Rodney, How Europe Underdeveloped Africa (Washington, DC: Howard University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
  59. 201.
    Gabriel Lisette, “Politique Étrangère du Gouvernement,” Assemblée Nationale, 2eme séance (March 11, 1948), 1563.Google Scholar
  60. 219.
    Fred Marte, Political Cycles in International Relations (Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1994), 49–141.Google Scholar
  61. 220.
    See, Victor Biaka Boda, “Projet de loi tendant a ratifier le Pacte de l’Atlantique,” Journal Officiel, no. 65 (July 27, 1949).Google Scholar
  62. 221.
    Alioune M’Bengue, “Union Française: Espoir d’un peuple,” Condition Humaine, no. 37 (April 26, 1949), 1 and 4.Google Scholar
  63. 227.
    Mamadou Dia, “Nos Erreurs Politiques,” Condition Humaine: Au service de la révolution sociale, no. 1 (Wednesday February 11, 1948), 1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Siba N. Grovogui 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siba N. Grovogui

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations