Skip to main content

Environmental values for a sustainable society: the democratic challenge

  • Chapter
Greening Environmental Policy

Abstract

The first Earth Day — 20 April 1970 — was a more seminal political event than was realized at the time. Since that time, environmental issues have gradually, though sometimes haltingly, become first-order political concerns. By the mid-1980s environmental protection was viewed by many as being as important to our collective well-being as national security, economic prosperity, social justice and — for some — even democracy itself. Some, at that time, would even have argued that if and when trade-offs between first-order values must be made, protecting the environment should be ‘first among equals’, a transcendent priority. The real challenge is to know what values must and should be traded off, when and to what extent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See the work of Thomas R. Malthus, W. Stanley Jeavons and others discussed in R.C. Paehlke, Environmentalism and the Future of Progressive Politics (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1989), Ch. 3. See also D.H. Meadows et al., The Limits to Growth (New York: Universe Books, 1972); W.R. Catton, jr, Overshoot: The Ecological Basis of Revolutionary Change (Urbana, Ill: University of Illinois Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, in particular, W. Ophuls, Ecology and the Politics of Scarcity (San Francisco, Calif.: W.H. Freeman, 1977); R.L. Heilbroner, An Inquiry into the Human Prospect (New York: Norton, 1974); T.R. Gurr, ‘On the political consequences of scarcity and economic decline,’ International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 29, 1985, pp. 51–75.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S.P. Hayes, ‘From conservation to environment: environmental politics in the United States since world war two,’ Environmental Review, Vol. 6, Fall, 1982, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Sessions, ‘The deep ecology movement: a review,’ Environmental Review, Vol. 11, Summer, 1987, p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Inglehart, The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Eckersley, Environmentalism and Political Theory: Toward an Ecocentric Approach (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  7. See N. Myers, ‘Biodepletion,’ in R. Paehlke (ed) Encyclopedia of Conservation and Environmentalism (New York: Garland, 1995); J.A. Livingston, Rogue Primate (Toronto: Key Porter Books, 1994); C. Tudge, Last Animals at the Zoo (Washington, DC: Island Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. Moore Lappé, Diet for a Small Planet (New York: Ballantine Books, 1975); L. Pim, The Invisible Additive: Environmental Contaminants in Our Food (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1982); J. Robbins, Diet for a New America (Walpole, NH: Stillpoint Publishing, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Lowe, The Bicycle: Vehicle for a Small Planet (Washington, DC: World-watch, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Wildavsky, Searching for Safety (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Sagoff, The Economy of the Earth (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 195–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See, for example, P. Ekins (ed.) The Living Economy: A New Economics in the Making (London: Routledge, 1986); D. Pearce, Economic Values and the Natural World (London: Earthscan, 1993); as well as the journal Ecological Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Milbrath, L.W. (1984) Environmentalists: Vanguard for a New Society, Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Kazis and R.L. Grossman, Fear at Work (New York: Pilgrim Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Several relevant studies are cited in F.H. Buttel, C.C. Geisler and I.W. Wiswall (eds) Labor and the Environment (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1984); see, in particular, their annotations 016, 017, 040, 050, 064, 105 and 159.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Regarding recycling and refillable containers and employment, see W.U. Chandler, Materials Recycling: The Virtue of Necessity (Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute, 1984); C.M. Gudger and J.C. Bailes, The Economic Impact of Oregon’s Bottle Bill (Corvallis, Oreg.: Oregon State University Press, 1974). Regarding energy conservation and employment see, for example, sources annotated in Buttel, Geisler and Wiswall (eds) Labor and the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. Hannon and F. Puleo, Transferring from Urban Cars to Buses: The Energy and Employment Impacts, (Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois, Center for Advanced Computation, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  18. See, for example, R.D. Bullard, Dumpling in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1991); C. Lee, Toxic Waste and Race in the United States (New York: United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice, 1987); L. Blumberg and R. Gottlieb, ‘The new environmentalists: saying no to mass burn,’ Environmental Action, Vol. 20, January/February, 1989, pp. 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See R.D. Bullard, Unequal Protection: Environmental Justice and Communities of Color (San Francisco, Calif.: Sierra Club Books, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  20. World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  21. See K. Boulding, ‘The encounters of the coming spaceship earth,’ in H.E. Daly (ed.) Economics, Ecology, Ethics (San Francisco, Calif.: W.H. Freeman, 1980), pp. 253–63.

    Google Scholar 

  22. World Commission, Our Common Future, pp. 6–7. See also International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN), World Conservation Strategy (Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, 1980); Independent Commission on Disarmament and Security Issues (Olaf Palme, Chairman), Common Security: A Blueprint for Survival (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1982); W. Brandt, World Armament and World Hunger (London: Victor Gollancz, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  23. A.B. Lovins and L. Hunter Lovins, Energy/War: Breaking the Nuclear Link (New York: Harper & Row, 1980), p. 153.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Passmore, Man’s Responsibility for Nature (London: Duckworth, 1974), p. 183.

    Google Scholar 

  25. For a broad consideration of environmentalism and administration, including the issue of openness, see R. Paehlke and D. Torgerson (eds) Managing Leviathan: Environmental Politics and the Administrative State (Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  26. See, for example, G. McConnell, ‘The conservation movement — past and present,’ Western Political Quarterly, Vol. 7, 1954, pp. 470–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. The broad issue of participation and the right to know is discussed in S.G. Hadden, A Citizen’s Right to Know: Risk Communication and Public Policy (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1995 Robert Paehlke

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paehlke, R. (1995). Environmental values for a sustainable society: the democratic challenge. In: Fischer, F., Black, M. (eds) Greening Environmental Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-08357-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics