Abstract
The period of reequilibration is characterized by precarious adjustments in the political, social, and economic spheres. Post-secessionist regions will vary in their ability to tide over the hurdles that will present themselves after severance of ties with the center. With respect to the economic adjustment, its smoothness will depend upon several economic characteristics that are embodied in the term viability. Economic viability is a concept often used and rarely defined. A simple working definition adopted here is the following: viability of a region implies the ability to sustain growth in the aftermath of secession at the preindependence levels. In adopting this definition, a distinction must be made between the short run and the long run, since most regions are capable of economic survival in the long run after forging new relationships with the international economy and the nation from which they seceded. With secession, regions strive to at least continue (if not improve) their level of economic performance. The concept of an economic status quo in the aftermath of secession has been addressed by Buchanon, who points out that, from a philosophical perspective, there is no reason to assume that a region has a right to an economic status quo. Indeed, according to Buchanon, “this dubious principle of entitlement to the status quo” is simply not justified in either secession or divorce.3 It is nevertheless a useful tool used in hypothesizing about post-secessionist viability.
It was fundamentally a matter of recognizing reality… It made no sense to antagonize the Indonesians… East Timor was not a viable entity.
—Brent Scowcroft, President Ford’s national security adviser, when asked why the Ford administration did not warn the Indonesians against invading
East Timor1
I am absolutely convinced that a confederation is a… liberal illusion that can lead either to a federation or to war.
—Gennady Burbulis, Russian government official discussing the future of relations among the independent states of the former Soviet Union in 19922
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Allen Buchanon, Secession, Boulder: Westview Press, 1991, p. 92.
This was briefly discussed in chapter 4 and is treated at length in M. Zarkovic, Issues in Indian Agricultural Development, Boulder: Westview Press, 1987.
Regione Lombarda, Guida Pratica Delia Lombardia, Milan: Amilcare Pizzi, 1990, p. 14.
Deutsche Bank, The Soviet Union at the Crossroads: Facts and Figures on the Soviet Republics, Frankfurt: Deutsche Bank, 1991, p. 24.
Louis Snyder, Global Mini-Nationalisms: Autonomy or Independence, West-port: Greenwood Press, 1982, p. 186.
James Griffin, “Movements for Separation and Secession,” in Anthony Clunies Ross and John Langmore, eds., Alternative Strategies for Papua New Guinea, Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1973, p. 126.
Howard Epstein, ed., Revolt in the Congo1960–64, New York: Facts on File, 1965, p. 177.
Rene Lemarchand, Political Awakening in the Belgian Congo, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1964, p. 234.
Fernand Hernan, Courrier Africain, March 4, 1960. Notes to Chapter 8
William L. Langer, An Encyclopedia of World History, 5th ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1972.
The role of the Catholic church in anti-Serbian war activities in Croatia during World War II is discussed in the following: The Economist, August 22, 1992, p. 36; and Stewart Lamont, Church and State: Uneasy Alliances, London: Bodley Head, 1989, p. 146. Furthermore, the Croatian minister of the interior of the independent fascist government during World War II, A. Artukovic, stated at his trial that whatever he and his Ustashas had done conformed to the principals of morality of the Catholic church (Borba, December 26, 1988).
Conor Cruise O’Brien, Godland: Reflections on Religion and Nationalism, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988, p. 40.
Regione Lombarda, Guida Pratica Delia Lombardia, Milan: Amilcare Pizzi, 1990, p. 14.
Deutsche Bank, The Soviet Union at the Crossroads: Facts and Figures on the Soviet Republics, Frankfurt: Deutsche Bank, 1991, p. 24.
Louis Snyder, Global Mini-Nationalisms: Autonomy or Independence, West-port: Greenwood Press, 1982, p. 186.
James Griffin, “Movements for Separation and Secession,” in Anthony Clunies Ross and John Langmore, eds., Alternative Strategies for Papua New Guinea, Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1973, p. 126.
Howard Epstein, ed., Revolt in the Congo 1960–64, New York: Facts on File, 1965, p. 177.
Rene Lemarchand, Political Awakening in the Belgian Congo, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1964, p. 234.
Fernand Hernan, Courrier Africain, March 4, 1960.
Copyright information
© 1992 Milica Zarkovic Bookman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bookman, M.Z. (1992). Post-Secession Economic Viability. In: The Economics of Secession. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07984-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07984-8_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-60650-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-07984-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)