Economic Variables and Phases of the Secessionist Process

  • Milica Zarkovic Bookman

Abstract

Secession is a topic traditionally addressed by political scientists and historians, not economists. The former have addressed it in their attempts to understand the process of nation building, the definition of state versus nation, the integration of populations, and the political development accompanying modernization.1 Some have specialized in the international aspects of separatism by studying the cause and effect of secession on various aspects of international relations,2 while others have studied the role of nationalism in secession.3 Psychological studies have emerged studying groups and their behavior in secessionist activity.4 Historians have studied secessionist movements during and after colonial times, such as those that thrived within the Ottoman, Russian and Austro-Hungarian Empires.5 Anthropological studies have observed secession from the viewpoint of ethnic groups and their functioning under various forms of national integration.6 Philosophers have addressed secession from the point of view of the moral right to secede and the moral imperative to accept secession and recognize the seceding region.7 Legal experts have even extended the concept of secession to include employment-related issues.8 Finally, geographers have contributed to the debate by affirming the importance of territory and social space.9

Keywords

Migration Europe Transportation Income Explosive 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Lee Buchheit, Secession: The Legitimacy of Self-Determination, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978Google Scholar
  2. Michael Burgess, Federalism and Federation in Western Europe, London: Croom Helm, 1986Google Scholar
  3. Donald Gelfand and Russell Lee, eds., Ethnic Conflicts and Power: A Cross-National Perspective, New York: John Wiley, 1973Google Scholar
  4. Raymond Hall, Ethnic Autonomy: Comparative Dynamics, New York: Pergamon, 1979Google Scholar
  5. Setin Rokkan and Derek Urwin, eds., The Politics of Territorial Identity, London: Sage Publications, 1982Google Scholar
  6. Dov Ronen, The Quest for Self-Determination, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979Google Scholar
  7. Frederick Shiels, ed., Ethnic Separatism and World Politics, Lanham: University Press of America, 1984.Google Scholar
  8. 2.
    Naomi Chazan, ed., Irredentism and International Politics, Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1991Google Scholar
  9. Astri Suhrke and Lela Garner Noble, eds., Ethnic Conflict in International Relations, New York: Praeger, 1977Google Scholar
  10. Judy Bartelsen, ed., Non-state Nations in International Politics: A Comparative System Analysis, New York: Praeger, 1977Google Scholar
  11. James Mayall, Nationalism and International Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 3.
    John Breuilly, Nationalism and the State, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1985Google Scholar
  13. Colin Williams, ed., National Separatism, Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1982Google Scholar
  14. Anthony Smith, The Ethnic Revival, London: Cambridge University Press, 1981Google Scholar
  15. Leo Despres, ed., Ethnicity and Resource Competition in Plural Societies, The Hague: Mouton, 1975, among others.Google Scholar
  16. 4.
    Robert LeVine and Donald Campbell, Ethnocentrism: Theories of Conflict, Ethnic Attitudes and Group Behavior, New York: John Wiley 1972Google Scholar
  17. Vanik Volkan, Cypress#x2014;War and Adaptation: A Psychoanalytic History of Two Ethnic Groups in Conflict, Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1979.Google Scholar
  18. 5.
    Rupert Emerson, From Empire to Nation: The Rise to Self-Assertion of Asian and African Peoples, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ali Mazrui, Post-Imperial Fragmentation, Denver: University of Denver (Center on International Race Relations), 1960Google Scholar
  20. O. Jaszi, The Dissolution of the Hapsburg Monarchy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1929Google Scholar
  21. R. Hart-shiorne “A Survey of the Boundary Problems of Europe” in C. C. Colby, ed., Geographical Aspects of International Relations, Port Washington, N.Y.: Kennikat Press, 1970Google Scholar
  22. F. Czernin, Versailles 1919, New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1964.Google Scholar
  23. Also, see the section on economic nationalism in the aftermath of the breakup of empires in Nigel Harris, National Liberation, London: I. B. Tauris, 1990, pp. 244–268.Google Scholar
  24. 6.
    Fredrik Barth, ed., Ethnic Groups and Boundaries, Boston: Little, Brown, 1979Google Scholar
  25. Nathan Glazer and Daniel Moynihan, eds., Ethnicity, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  26. 7.
    Allen Buchanon, Secession, Boulder: Westview Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  27. 8.
    Mark McLaughlin, “Employee Secession: A Company’s Rights When Staffers Leave and Clients Follow,” New England Business 8, no. 19, November 17, 1986, pp. 58–59.Google Scholar
  28. 9.
    J. Anderson, “Nationalism and Geography” in The Rise of the Modern State, Brighton: Harvester Press, 1986Google Scholar
  29. J. Agnew “Is there a Geography of Nationalism? The Case of Place and Nationalism in Scotland” in C. H. Williams and E. Kofman, eds., Community Conflict, Partition and Nationalism, London: Croom Helm, 1987Google Scholar
  30. D. B. Knight, “Geographical Perspectives on Self- Determination,” in P. Taylor and J. House, eds., Political Geography: Recent Advances and Future Direction, London: Croom Helm, 1984.Google Scholar
  31. 10.
    Walter Conner, “Nation Building or Nation Destroying?” World Politics 24, 1972, p. 342.Google Scholar
  32. 13.
    This view is held by M. Hechter (Internal Colonialism: The Celtic Fringe in British National Development, 1536–1966, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975)Google Scholar
  33. and T. Nairn (The Break-Up of Britain: Crisis and Neo-National-ism, London: New Left Books, 1977).Google Scholar
  34. 14.
    Miroslav Hroch, Social Preconditions of National Revival in Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985; Beth Michneck, “Regional Autonomy, Territoriality, and the Economy” paper presented to the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies, Washington, D.C., October 1990Google Scholar
  35. Anthony Birch, Nationalism and National Integration, London: Unwin Hyman, 1989.Google Scholar
  36. 15.
    Christine Drake, National Integration in Indonesia: Patterns and Policies, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1989, p. 145.Google Scholar
  37. 16.
    E. J. Hobsbawm, Nations and Nationalism Since 1780, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  38. 17.
    Immanuel Wallerstein, Africa: The Politics of Independence, New York: Vintage, 1961, p. 88.Google Scholar
  39. 18.
    Milica Zarkovic Bookman, The Political Economy of Discontinuous Development, New York: Praeger 1991.Google Scholar
  40. 22.
    Peter Leslie, “Ethnonationalism in a Federal State: The Case of Canada,” in Joseph Rudolph, Jr., and Robert J. Thompson, eds., Ethnoterritorial Politics, Policy and the Western World, Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1989, p.47.Google Scholar
  41. 23.
    Ian Bremmer, “Fraternal Illusions: Nations and Politics in the USSR” paper presented to the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies, Miami, 1991, p. 47; Albert O. Hirshman, Exit, Voice and Loyalty, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  42. 27.
    C. M. Turnbull, A History of Singapore 1819–1988, Singapore: Oxford University Press, 1989, p. 288.Google Scholar
  43. 33.
    Tom Nairn, The Break-Up of Britain, London: New Left Books, 1977.Google Scholar
  44. 35.
    William Beer, The Unexpected Rebellion: Ethnic Activism in Contemporary France, New York: New York University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  45. 36.
    Michael Hechter, Internal Colonialism: The Celtic Fringe in British National Development 1536–1966, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  46. 37.
    Peter Alexis Gourevitch, “The Emergence of Peripheral Nationalisms: Some Comparative Speculations on the Spatial Distribution of Political Leadership and Economic Growth,” The Comparative Study of Society and History 21, July 1979, p. 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 38.
    Karl Deutsch, Nationalism and Social Communication, 2nd ed., New York: MIT Press, 1966Google Scholar
  48. and Karl Deutsch Nationalism and its Alternatives, New York: Knopf, 1969Google Scholar
  49. Samuel Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  50. 40.
    This view is attributed to Otto Bauer, and discussed in Alexander J. Motyl, “From Imperial Decay to Imperial Collapse: The Fall of the Soviet Empire in Comparative Perspective” in Richard L. Rudolph and David F. Good, eds., Nationalism and Empire: The Hahshurg Empire and the Soviet Union, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1992, p. 28.Google Scholar
  51. 41.
    The word “usually” is used because the relationship between income per capita and education is not always positive, as was found by David Morawetz (Twenty-five Years of Economic Development, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
  52. 48.
    Frank Ley and Edwin M. Truman, “Toward a Rational Theory of Decentralization: Another View,” American Political Science Review 65, March 1971, p. 88.Google Scholar
  53. 49.
    United Nations, Decentralization for National and Local Development, New York, 1962, p. 88Google Scholar
  54. cited in Al-Agab Ahmed Al-Teraifi, “Regionalisation in the Sudan” in Peter Woodward, ed., Sudan After Nimeiri, London: Routledge, 1991, p. 92.Google Scholar
  55. 51.
    Frederick Pryor, A Guidebook to the Comparative Study of Economic Systems, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Milica Zarkovic Bookman 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Milica Zarkovic Bookman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations