Abstract
The intense efforts to protect the sanctity of intellectual property are ironic. Although the promoters of intellectual property justify their claims on the basis of the wonders of new technology, the flowering of today’s commercial successes depends on scientific discoveries from decades ago, when science still enjoyed considerable public funding. However, the private interests that now stake claims for intellectual property rarely recognize how much this earlier work, centered in universities or government agencies, enriched the public domain of science and technology.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Francis Narin, Kimberly S. Hamilton, and Dominic Olivastro, “The Increasing Linkage Between U.S. Technology and Public Science,” Research Policy, Vol. 26, No. 3 (1997): 317–30.
Paula E. Stephan, “The Economics of Science,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 34, No. 3 (September 1996): 1227.
James D. Adams, “Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity Growth,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 18, No. 4 (August 1990): 673–702.
Renate Mayntz, “Socialist Academies of Sciences: The Enforced Orientation of Basic Research at User Needs,” Research Policy, Vol. 27 (1998): 791.
Paul A. David, “Common Agency Contracting and the Emergence of “Open Science” Institutions.” American Economic Review, Vol. 88, No. 2 (May 1998): 17.
David Levy, “The Market for Fame and Fortune,” History of Political Economy, Vol. 20, No. 4 (Winter 1998): 615–25.
Stephan, “The Economics of Science,” pp. 1201–8; Paula E. Stephan and Sharon G. Levin, Striking the Mother Lode in Science: The Importance of Age, Place, and Time (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), p. 18.
Robert King Merton, Sociology of Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973), p. 610.
Robert King Merton, On the Shoulders of Giants: A Shandean Postscript (NY: Free Press, 1965).
Melvin Krantzberg, “Technology and History: ‘Krantzberg’s Laws,’” Technology and Culture, Vol. 27, No. 3 (July 1986): 549.
Daniel G. Dupont and Richard Lardner, “Needles in a Cold War Haystack,” Scientific American, Vol. 275, No. 4 (November 1996): 41.
Judith Reppy, “Military R&D and the Civilian Economy,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 41, No. 9 (October 1985): 12.
Alfred E. Kahn, “Fundamental Deficiencies of the American Patent Law,” American Economic Review, Vol. 30, No. 3 (September 1940), p. 479.
Michael Polanvyi, “Patent Reform,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 11, No. 2 (Summer 1944): 70–71.
Eric von Hippel, The Sources of Innovation (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998).
See Friedrich A. Hayek, “The Use of Knowledge in Society,” American Economic Review, Vol. 35, No. 4 (September 1945): 519–30.
See Richard R. Nelson, “The Link Between Science and Invention: The Case of the Transistor,” in Richard R. Nelson, ed. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962), pp. 549–83
Richard R. Nelson, The Sources of Economic Growth (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996), p. 179.
Michael J. L. O’Connor, The Origins of Academic Economics in the United States (NY: Columbia University Press, 1944).
James C. Williams, “Frederick E. Terman and the Rise of Silicon Valley,” International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 16, No. 8 (1998): 751–60.
Thorstein Velben, The Higher Learning in America: Memorandum on the Conduct of Universities by Business Men (NY: B. W Huebsch, 1918).
Clyde W Barrow, Universities and the Capitalist State (Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1990), pp. 61–71.
G. Pascal Zachary, Endless Frontier: Vannevar Bush, Engineer of the American Century (NY: Free Press, 1997), p. 183.
Richard Nelson and Nathan Rosenberg, “American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry,” Research Policy, Vol. 23, No. 3 (May 1994): 324.
W.W. Powell and J. Owen-Smith, “Universities and the Market for Intellectual Property in the Life Sciences,” in Burton A. Weisbrod, ed. To Profit or Not to Profit: The Commercial Transformation of the Nonprofit Sector (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 174.
Richard Arman Gregory, Discovery, Or, The Spirit and Service of Science (NY: Macmillan, 1916), p. 3.
William L. Goffe and Robert P. Parks, “The Future Information Infrastructure in Economics,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 11, No. 3 (Summer 1997): 79.
See Yale Braunstein,. “Information as a Commodity: Public Policy Issues and Recent Research.,” in Information Services: Economics, Management, and Technology, ed. Robert M. Mason and John E. Creps, Jr. (Boulder: Westview Press, 1981), p. 19.
W. Wayt Gibbs, “Information Haves and Have-Nots,” Scientific American, Vol. 272, No. 5 (May 1995): 12–14.
Andrew R. Albanese, “Persistent Suitor,” Lingua Franca, Vol. 10, No. 9 (December 2000/ January 2001): 23–24.
Sheila Slaughter and Larry Leslie, Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University (Baltimore: John Hopkins, 1997), p. 7.
Ronald G. Ehrenberg, Tuition Rising: Why College Costs So Much (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000).
Lawrence C. Soley, Leasing the Ivory Tower: The Corporate Takeover of Academia (Boston: South End Press, 1995).
Paul R. Ehrlich and Anne H. Ehrlich, Betrayal of Science and Reason: How Anti-environmental Rhetoric Threatens Our Future (Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1996), p. 36 ff.
Eyal Press and Jennifer Washburn, “The Kept University,” Atlantic Monthly, Vol. 285, No. 3 (March 2000): 41.
Rebecca Henderson and Iain Cockburn, “Scale, Scope, and Spillovers: The Determinants of Research Productivity in Drug Discovery,” Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 27, No. 3 (Spring 1996): 32–59.
Editorial, “Tightening Grip of Big Pharma,” The Lancet, Vol. 357, No. 9263 (2001), p. 1141.
AnnaLee Saxenian, “Comment on Kenney and von Burg, ‘Technology, Entrepreneurship and Path Dependence: Industrial Cluster in Silicon Valley and Route 128,’” Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 8, No. 1 (March 1999): 105–10.
Susan Zolla-Pazner, “The Professor, the University, and Industry,” Scientific American, Vol. 268, No. 3 (March 1994): 120.
Susan Zolla-Pazner, “The Professor, the University, and Industry,” Scientific American, Vol. 268, No. 3 (March 1994): p. 120.
W Wayt Gibbs, “The Price of Silence” Scientific American, Vol. 274, No. 4 (November 1996): 15–16.
Stephan and Levin, Striking the Mother Lode in Science, p. 15; citing Lewis Wolpert and Alison Richards, A Passion for Science (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998), p. 106.
Gretchen Vogel, “Long-Suppressed Study Finally Sees Light of Day,” Science, Vol. 676, No. 2312 (April 25, 1997): 525–26.
Goldie Blumenstyk, “Researchers Tell of Battling for the Right to Publish Negative Findings,” Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol. 54, No. 31 (April 9, 1999): A 44.
Richard Horton, “Lotronex and the FDA: A Fatal Erosion of Integrity,” The Lancet, Vol. 357, No. 9268 (2001): 1544.
Eric G. Campbell, Joel S. Weissman, Nancyanne Causino, and David Blumenthal, “Data Withholding in Academic Medicine: Characteristics of Faculty Denied Access to Research Results and Biomaterials,” Research Policy, Vol. 29, No. 2 (February 2000): 303–12.
Anon, “Is the University-Industrial Complex Out of Control?,” Nature, Vol. 409, No. 6817 (January 11, 2001): 119.
Sheldon Krimsky, L. S. Rothenberg, P. Stott, and G. Kyle, “Financial Interests of Authors in Scientific Journals: A Pilot Study of 14 Publications,” Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 2 (1996): 395–410.
Henry Thomas Stelfox, Grace Chua, Keith O’Rourke, and Allan S. Detsky, “Conflict of Interest in the Debate over Calcium-Channel Antagonists,” The New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 338, No. 2 (January 8, 1998): 101–6.
Copyright information
© 2002 Michael Perelman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Perelman, M. (2002). Intellectual Property vs. Science. In: Steal This Idea. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07929-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07929-9_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-6713-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-07929-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)