The Study of Warfare in the Third World

  • Robert E. Harkavy
  • Stephanie G. Neuman

Abstract

It is a much belabored but accurate truism, bordering upon cliché, that most writings on trends in international affairs (and related theories of international relations) are heavily reflective of their immediate historical context, that is, of recent events. And, ipso facto, most predictions about the future are merely extrapolations from present trends. Surprises, discontinuities, sudden upheavals, and cyclical movements are much harder to anticipate.

Keywords

Europe Radar Explosive Turkey Trench 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    See, among numerous examples, Dennis Meadows and Donella Meadows, The Limits to Growth (New York: Universe Books, 1972);Google Scholar
  2. and Dennis Pirages, The New Context for International Relations: Global Ecopolitics (N. Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press, 1978).Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    Samuel Huntington places this in the context of what he perceives as five waves of “declinist” anxiety in the U.S., one of which was in the late 1970s and early 1980s in connection with Soviet military power. See his “The U.S.—Decline or Renewal?” Foreign Affairs, vol. 67, no. 2 (winter 1998/99), pp. 76–96. The scenarios are in Tom Clancy, Red Storm Rising (New York: Putnam, 1986);Google Scholar
  4. and Sir John W. Hackett, The Third World War: The Untold Story (New York: Macmillan, 1982).Google Scholar
  5. 3.
    Perhaps the best examples of this genre are the three-volume series by Anthony Cordesman and Abraham Wagner, The Lessons of Modern War (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1990), pertaining to the Arab-Israeli conflicts, the Iran-Iraq War, and the Afghanistan and Falklands wars.Google Scholar
  6. 4.
    See Michael Howard, “The Use and Abuse of Military History,” Parameters, vol. 6, no. 1 (March 1981), pp. 9–14.Google Scholar
  7. 5.
    This theme was developed by Eliot Cohen, “Distant Battles,” in Stephanie G. Neuman and Robert Harkavy, The Lessons of Recent Wars in the Third World (Lexington, MA: D C. Heath, 1987), pp. 7–32.Google Scholar
  8. The thesis that the frequency of interstate conventional wars should be tamped down by the regional proliferation of nuclear weapons is in Martin van Creveld, The Transformation of War (New York: Free Press, 1991), chapters 1 and 7.Google Scholar
  9. 6.
    Otto Chaney, Zhukov (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1971), chapter 4, under “Khalkhin-Gol”;Google Scholar
  10. Richard Whymant, Stalin’s Spy: Richard Sorge and the Tokyo Espionage Ring (New York: Thomas Dunne, 1998), p. 109;Google Scholar
  11. and Viktor Anfilov, “Zhukov,” in Harold Shukman, ed., Stalin’s Generals (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1993), chapter 26.Google Scholar
  12. 7.
    This is pointed out in Jack Snyder, The Ideology of the Offensive: Military Decision Making and the Disasters of 1914 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984), chapter 1, esp. p. 21.Google Scholar
  13. 8.
    See Edward Luttwak, The Pentagon and the Art of War (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1984), pp. 98–107.Google Scholar
  14. 10.
    See Harlan Jencks, “Lessons of a ‘Lesson’: China-Vietnam, 1979,” in Robert E. Harkavy and Stephanie G. Neuman, The Lessons of Recent Wars in the Third World, vol. 1 (Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath, 1985), pp. 139–160.Google Scholar
  15. 11.
    Among the efforts at organized and formal “lessons learned” analyses of the Gulf War are Department of Defense, Conduct of the Persian Gulf War, Final Report to Congress, Pursuant to Title V of the Persian Gulf Conflict Supplemental Authorization and Personnel Benefits Act of 1991 (Public Law 102–25, Washington, DC, April 1992) [hereinafter, The Pentagon Report]; and James F. Dunnigan and Austin Bay, From Shield to Storm (New York: William Morrow, 1992).Google Scholar
  16. 12.
    This is argued, pro and con, in Edward Luttwak, “The Gulf War in its Purely Military Dimensions,” in John O’Loughlin, Tom Mayer, and Edward S. Greenberg, eds., War and Its Consequences: Lessons from the Persian Gulf Conflict (New York: HarperCollins, 1994), pp. 33–50.Google Scholar
  17. 13.
    In a broader historical sense, this is discussed in Frank Kendall, “Exploiting the Military Technical Revolution: A Concept for Joint Warfare,” Strategic Review, vol. 20, no. 2 (spring 1992), pp. 23–30;Google Scholar
  18. and Michael J. Mazaar, The Revolution in Military Affairs: A Framework for Defense Planning (Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute, June 1994).Google Scholar
  19. 14.
    The possible threat of a rising, “hegemonic China” has been bruited and popularized in Rchard Bernstein and Ross Munro, The Coming Conflict with China (New York: Alfred Knopf, 1997).Google Scholar
  20. 15.
    For various schemes outlining possible “images” or structures of an emerging international system around the turn of the century, see Robert E. Harkavy, “Images of the Coming International System,” Orbis, vol. 41, no. 4 (fall 1997), pp. 568–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. See also Alexander Nacht, “U.S. Foreign Policy Strategies,” The Washington Quarterly, vol. 18, no. 3 (summer 1995), pp. 195–210,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. and Samuel Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996), pp. 21–35.Google Scholar
  23. 16.
    This gap or barrier between military history and the related social sciences, particularly as it pertains to how the former might inform questions about the causes of war, is discussed in Walter Emil Kaegi, Jr., “The Crisis in Military Historiography,” Armed Forces and Society, vol. 7, no. 2 (winter 1980), pp. 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. See also, regarding the linkage-or lack of same-between military history and modern strategic studies, Harry L. Coles, “Strategic Studies since 1945: The Era of Overthink,” Military Review, vol. 53, no. 4 (April 1973), pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
  25. 18.
    See among others, Keith Krause, Arms and the State: Patterns of Military Production and Trade (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. and Robert E. Harkavy and Stephanie G. Neuman, special ed., “The Arms Trade: Problems and Prospects in the Post—Cold War World,” The Annals, American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 535, September 1994.Google Scholar
  27. 19.
    In addition to the works of Keegan, van Creveld, and Kennedy cited elsewhere in this chapter, see Brian Bond, The Pursuit of Victory: From Napoleon to Saddam Hussein (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  28. 20.
    See, in particular, Colin Gray, The Leverage of Sea Power: The Strategic Advantage of Navies in War (New York: Maxwell Macmillan, 1982);Google Scholar
  29. and George Modelski and William R. Thompson, Seapower in Global Politics, 1494–1993 (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 21.
    Harry Summers, On Strategy: A Critical Analysis of the Vietnam War (Novato, CA: Presidio Press, 1982).Google Scholar
  31. 23.
    John Mueller, Retreat from Doomsday: The Obsolescence of Major War (New York: Basic Books, 1989).Google Scholar
  32. 24.
    See Kenneth Waltz, “The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More May be Better,” Adelphi Paper no. 171 (London: Brassey’s for the IISS, 1987);Google Scholar
  33. Kenneth Waltz and Scott Sagan, The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate (New York: Norton, 1995);Google Scholar
  34. and Martin van Creveld, Nuclear Proliferation and the Future of Conflict (New York: Free Press, 1983).Google Scholar
  35. 28.
    This term is drawn from and has been popularized by, John Lewis Gaddis, The Long Peace: Inquiries into the History of the Cold War (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
  36. 30.
    This is discussed in V. V. Aspaturian, “Russia: A Threat of Tomorrow,” in Werner Kaltefleiter and Ulrike Schumacher, Conflicts, Options, Strategies in a Threatened World (Kiel: Christian-Albrechts-University 1995), pp. 39–66.Google Scholar
  37. 32.
    Francis Fukuyama, The End of History and the Last Man (New York: Free Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  38. 33.
    John Keegan, A History of Warfare (New York: Alfred Knopf, 1993); and Brian Bond, The Pursuit of Victory. Google Scholar
  39. 34.
    Max Singer and Aaron Wildavsky, The Real World Order: Zones of Peace, Zones of Turmoil (Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, 1993).Google Scholar
  40. 35.
    Amidst a near blizzard of contemporary analysis of the “democratic peace,” see in particular Bruce M. Russett, Grasping the Democratic Peace (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  41. 36.
    Paul Kennedy, Preparing for the Twenty-First Century (New York: Random House, 1993);Google Scholar
  42. and Robert Kaplan, The Ends of the Earth: A Journey at the Dawn of the Twenty-First Century (New York: Random House, 1996).Google Scholar
  43. 37.
    Martin van Creveld, The Transformation of Warfare (New York: Free Press, 1991).Google Scholar
  44. 46.
    William J. Perry, “Desert Storm and Deterrence,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 70, no. 4 (fall 1991), pp. 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 47.
    Admiral William A. Owens, “Introduction,” in Stuart E. Johnson and Martin C. Libicki, eds., Dominant Battlespace Knowledge (Washington, DC: National Defense University, 1996), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  46. 48.
    Douglas A. MacGregor, “A Future Batde:The Merging Levels of War,” Parameters, vol. 22, no. 4 (winter 1992–93), pp. 33–47.Google Scholar
  47. 49.
    Alvin H. Bernstein, “Conflict and Technology, The Next Generation,” in Werner Kaltefleiter and Ulrike Schumacher, Conflicts, Options, Strategies in a Threatened World (Kiel: Christian Albrechts University Press, 1995), pp. 145–157;Google Scholar
  48. and Martin Libicki, The Mesh and the Net: Speculations on Armed Conflict in a Time of Free Silicon (Washington, DC: National Defense University, 1994), McNair Paper no. 28.Google Scholar
  49. 53.
    Such scenarios are laid out by Casper Weinberger and Peter Schweizer, The Next War (Washington, DC: Regency Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  50. 54.
    Generally, regarding asymmetric strategies, see Patrick J. Garrity, Why the Gulf War Still Matters: Foreign Perspectives on the War and the Future of International Security (Los Alamos, NM: Center for National Security Studies), report no. 16, July 1993, pp. 87–90.Google Scholar
  51. 55.
    Sundarji is quoted in George Quester and Victor Utgoff, “No-First-Use and Non-Proliferation: Redefining Extended Deterrence,” Washington Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 2 (spring 1994), pp. 103–14 (107).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 57.
    In addition to the aforementioned annual chapter in SIPRI’s Yearbooks, see also the several reviews by John Laffin, The World in Conflict (London: Brassey’s, 1986–1993); and the also annual Strategic Survey by the International Institute for Strategic Studies, London.Google Scholar
  53. 58.
    For a review and classification of many of these conflicts, see Geoffrey Kemp and Robert E. Harkavy, Strategic Geography and the Changing Middle East (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1997), chapter 3, under “The Contemporary Middle East: The End of the Cold War and Continuing Regional Conflict.”Google Scholar
  54. 59.
    See the much discussed article by John Mearsheimer, “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War,” International Security, vol. 15, no. 1 (summer 1990), pp. 5–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 61.
    Keegan, ibid., discusses this more broadly in the context of a “Western,” Clausewitzian cultural tradition as applied to warfare. A putative “American way of war,” said to stress total victory, was earlier noted in Lincoln Bloomfield, “American Approaches to Military Strategy, Arms Control, and Disarmament: A Critique of the Postwar Experience,” in Robert Harkavy and Edward Kolodziej, eds., American Security Policy and Policy-Making (Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath, 1980), Chapter 14, pp. 225–226.Google Scholar
  56. 63.
    Ernest Evans, War Without Splendor: The U.S. Military and Low Level Conflict (New York: Greenwood Press, 1987).Google Scholar
  57. See also Lincoln Bloomfield and Amelia Leiss, Controlling Small Wars: A Strategy for the 1990s (New York: Knopf, 1969).Google Scholar
  58. 64.
    Sam Sarkesian, The New Battlefield (New York: Greenwood Press, 1986), p. 110.Google Scholar
  59. 66.
    This is defined and discussed in Ramses Amer et al., “Major Armed Conflicts,” in SIPRI Yearbook 1993 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), pp. 80–130, quote on p. 87.Google Scholar
  60. 68.
    J. David Singer, “The Level of Analysis Problem in International Relations,” in Klaus Knorr and Sidney Verba, eds., The International System (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961), pp. 77–92.Google Scholar
  61. 69.
    Patrick Morgan, Theories and Approaches to International Politics, 4 ed. (New Brunswick, NJ: Trans-action Books, 1987), pp. 10–11.Google Scholar
  62. 70.
    Paul Viotti and Mark Kauppi, International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, and Globalism, 2 ed. (New York: Macmillan, 1993).Google Scholar
  63. 71.
    Edward Luttwak, Strategy: The Logic of War and Peace (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1987), chapter 5.Google Scholar
  64. 72.
    The realm of “grand tactics” apparently derives from the military historian Jomini, as discussed in David M. Glantz, “The Nature of Soviet Operational Art,” Parameters, vol. 15, no. 1 (spring 1985), pp. 1–12 (3). See also U.S. Army War College, Military Strategy: Theory and Application, glossary, p. A5, wherein, “Grand” or “Higher” tactics is defined as “the employment of major units in combat supporting a military strategy executed at unified or combined command level.”Google Scholar
  65. 73.
    Allan R. Millett and Williamson Murray, eds., Military Effectiveness, 3 vols. (London: Allen and Unwin, 1988), esp. p. 4 of vol. 1.Google Scholar
  66. 75.
    John Collins, “The Essence of Strategy,” in Military Strategy: Theory and Application, reference text for the Department of Military Strategy, Planning, and Operations, 1983–1984 (Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College, 1983), p. 3–1.Google Scholar
  67. 83.
    Ibid., pp. 92–97. See also Martin van Creveld, Military Lessons of the Yom Kippur War: Historical Perspectives (Washington, DC: Georgetown CSIS, 1975), Washington Papers no. 24.Google Scholar
  68. 85.
    Ronald M. D’Amura, “Campaigns: The Essence of Operational Warfare,” Parameters, vol. 17, no. 2 (summer 1987), pp. 42–67 (44).Google Scholar
  69. 86.
    Dwight L.Adams and Clayton R. Newell, “Operational Art in the Joint and Combined Arenas,” Parameters, vol. 18, no. 2 (June 1988), pp. 33–39 (35).Google Scholar
  70. See also David Jablonsky, “Strategy and the Operational Level of War,” part 1, Parameters, vol. 17, no. 1 (spring 1987), pp. 67–76;Google Scholar
  71. John Turlington, “Truly Learning the Operational Art,” Parameters, vol. 17, no. 1 (spring 1987),, pp. 51–64;Google Scholar
  72. Jay Luvaas, “Thinking at the Operational Level,” Parameters, vol. 16, no. 1 (spring 1986), pp. 2–6;Google Scholar
  73. and John F. Meechan III, “The Operational Trilogy,” Parameters, vol. 16, no. 3 (autumn 1986), pp. 9–18.Google Scholar
  74. 91.
    Douglas A. MacGregor, “Future Battle: The Merging Levels of War,” Parameters, vol. 22, no. 4 (winter 1992–93), pp. 33–47 (38).Google Scholar
  75. 94.
    Quincy Wright, A Study of War, 2d ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965), pp. 701–716.Google Scholar
  76. 96.
    See John Keegan, The Face of Battle (New York: Pentium Books, 1978);Google Scholar
  77. and Paul Fussell, Wartime, Understanding and Behavior in the Second World War (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989); Doing Battle: The Making of a Skeptic (Boston: Little, Brown, 1996); and “My War,” Harper’s, vol. 264, no. 1580 (January 1982), pp. 40–48.Google Scholar
  78. 97.
    Nick Vaux, Take That Hill!: Royal Marines in the Falklands War (Washington, DC: Pergamon-Brassey’s, 1986);Google Scholar
  79. and Max Hastings and Simon Jenkins, The Battle for the Falklands (New York: Norton, 1984).Google Scholar
  80. 98.
    Avidgor Kahalani, The Heights of Courage: A Tank Leader’s War on the Golan (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1984).Google Scholar
  81. 99.
    Rick Atkinson, Crusade, The Untold Story of the Persian Gulf War (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1993);Google Scholar
  82. and Michael Gordon and Bernard Trainor, The General’s War: The Inside Story of the Conflict in the Gulf (Boston: Little, Brown, 1995).Google Scholar
  83. 100.
    Edgar O’Ballance, The Gulf War (London: Brassey’s, 1988);Google Scholar
  84. Randolph S. Churchill and Winston S. Churchill, The Six Day War (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1967).Google Scholar
  85. 101.
    S. L. A. Marshall, Sinai Victory (New York: William Morrow, 1967).Google Scholar
  86. 102.
    Ze’ev Schiff and Ehud Ya’ari, Israel’s Lebanon War (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1984).Google Scholar
  87. 103.
    Itamar Rabinovich, The War for Lebanon, 1970–1983 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984);Google Scholar
  88. and Walter Laqueur, Confrontation: The Middle East and World Politics (New York: Quadrangle/New York Times, 1974).Google Scholar
  89. 104.
    J. Bruce Amstutz, Afghanistan: The First Five Years of Soviet Occupation (Washington, DC: National Defense University, 1986);Google Scholar
  90. and Rosanne Klass, ed., Afghanistan: The Great Game Revisited (New York: Freedom House, 1987).Google Scholar
  91. 105.
    Nayan Chanda, Brother Enemy: The War after the War (San Diego: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1986).Google Scholar
  92. 109.
    Robert Taber, The War of the Flea: A Study of Guerilla Warfare Theory and Practice (New York: Lyle Stuart, 1965).Google Scholar
  93. 110.
    David Charters and Maurice Tugwell, eds., Armies in Low-Intensity Conflict (London: Brassey’s, 1989).Google Scholar
  94. See also Michael T. Klare and Peter Kornbluh, eds., Low Intensity Warfare (New York: Pantheon, 1988).Google Scholar
  95. 111.
    Hew Strachan, European Armies and the Conduct of War (London:Allen and Unwin, 1983).Google Scholar
  96. See also Colin McInnes and G. D. Sheffield, Warfare in the Twentieth Century (London: Unwin Hyman, 1988).Google Scholar
  97. 112.
    Edward Mead Earle, Makers of Modern Strategy: Military Thought From Machiavelli to Hitler (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1943), updated by a new edition in 1986 edited by Peter Paret.Google Scholar
  98. 113.
    J. F. C. Fuller, A Military History of the Western World, 3 vols. (New York: Funk and Wagnalls, 1954–56).Google Scholar
  99. 114.
    John Laffin, The World in Conflict (London: Brassey’s), annual beginning in 1986.Google Scholar
  100. 115.
    Patrick Brogan, The Fighting Never Stopped: A Comprehensive Guide to World Conflict Since 1945 (New York:Vintage Books, 1990).Google Scholar
  101. 116.
    James F. Dunnigan and Austin Bay, A Quick and Dirty Guide to War (New York: William Morrow, 1986).Google Scholar
  102. 117.
    Richard Ned Lebow, Between Peace and War (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981);Google Scholar
  103. Francis A. Beer, Peace against War: The Ecology of International Violence (San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1981);Google Scholar
  104. and Robert L. Butterworth, Managing Interstate Conflict, 1945–74 (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Center for International Studies, 1976).Google Scholar
  105. 118.
    Martin van Creveld, Supplying War: Logistics from Wallerstein to Patton (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1977);Google Scholar
  106. Patrick O’Sullivan, Terrain and Tactics (New York: Greenwood Press, 1991);Google Scholar
  107. and O’Sullivan and Jesse W. Miller, The Geography of Warfare (London: Croom Helm, 1983).Google Scholar
  108. 119.
    Nicholas Bethell, “The Forgotten War,” Harper’s, vol. 263, no. 1574 (July 1981), pp. 8–11;Google Scholar
  109. Francisco Goldman, “Guatemalan Death Masque,” Harper’s, vol. 272, no. 1628 (January 1986), pp. 56–60;Google Scholar
  110. Maria Thomas, “A State of Permanent Revolution,” Harper’s, vol. 274, no. 1640 (January 1987), pp. 53–59;Google Scholar
  111. Denis Johnson, “The Small Boys’ Unit,” Harper’s, vol. 301, no. 1805 (October 2000), pp. 41–60;Google Scholar
  112. and Patrick Symmes, “Miraculous Fishing: Lost in the Swamps of Colombia’s Drug War,” Harper’s, vol. 301, no. 1807, (December 2000), pp. 61–71.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Robert E. Harkavy and Stephanie G. Neuman 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert E. Harkavy
  • Stephanie G. Neuman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations