Abstract
In this book I have undertaken to explain two related things: first, the nature and serious limitations of Kant’s commitment to international political reform; and second, the reasons why conflicting understandings of his reform project He at the heart of contemporary divisions within liberal internationalism. In this conclusion, I make explicit the relationship between these two problems and draw together the explanations that have been developed above. In so doing, I want to emphasize the peculiar limits and possibilities of Kant’s thought within the context of the crisis of liberal internationalism noted above, and the divisions among its contemporary exponents that are likely to become much more salient in the years ahead.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Thomas W. Pogge, “Kant’s Theory of Justice,” Kant-Studien 79, 4 (1988): 412.
On the contractarian elements of Kant’s international thought, see Andrew Linklater, Men and Citizens in the Theory of International Relations (London: Macmillan, 1982), chap. 6.
Nicholas Greenwood Onuf, The Republican Legacy in International Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
Copyright information
© 2002 Antonio Franceschet
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Franceschet, A. (2002). Conclusion. In: Kant and Liberal Internationalism. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07853-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07853-7_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-63604-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-07853-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)