Liberal Internationalism and the Kantian “Legacy”

  • Antonio Franceschet


Since the end of the Cold War there has been a reascendancy of liberal ideology and of liberal internationalist conceptions of politics.2 The apparent renewal in the 1990s of international organizations, international law, democracy, and free-market principles around the world has put realpolitik on the defensive.3 But liberal internationalism’s revival is not a monolithic or unchallenged phenomenon. Indeed, there are signs of division among liberals too over the means and ends of international peace, justice, and most fundamentally, individual freedom.


International Relation Individual Freedom International Politics Sovereign State State Sovereignty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Richard Tuck, The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and International Order From Grotius to Kant (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 229–230.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    On the renaissance of liberal perspectives in International Relations, see Richard A. Matthew and Mark W. Zacher, “Liberal International Theory: Common Threads, Divergent Strands,” in Controversies in International Politics: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge, ed. Charles W. Kegley Jr. (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995), 107–150Google Scholar
  3. Peter Wilson, “Introduction,” in Thinkers of the Twenty Years’ Crisis: Inter-War Idealism Reassessed, ed. David Long and Peter Wilson (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), 2–14Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    See for example Bruce Russett, Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles of a Post-Cold War World (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993), 24.Google Scholar
  5. See also the debates in David A. Baldwin, ed., Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
  6. Sean M. Lynn-Jones and Steven E. Miller, eds., Debating the Democratic Peace (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  7. 4.
    Michael W. Doyle, Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism and Socialism (New York: W. W Norton & Company, 1997), 206.Google Scholar
  8. 5.
    This discussion of the nature of liberalism is necessarily truncated because the present book aims only to establish its interrelation with internationalism. For larger studies of liberalism, see John Gray, Liberalism, 2nd ed. (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995), 56–8Google Scholar
  9. James Meadowcroft, ed., The Liberal Political Tradition: Contemporary Reappraisals (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1996), 4.Google Scholar
  10. 6.
    Isaiah Berlin, Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969)Google Scholar
  11. some of the contributions to Zbigniew Pelczynski and John Gray, eds., Conceptions of Liberty in Political Philosophy (London: The Athlone Press, 1984).Google Scholar
  12. 7.
    Fred Halliday, “Three Concepts of Internationalism,” International Affairs 64, 2 (1988): 188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 11.
    Suganami, The Domestic Analogy in World Order Proposals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 12.
    Hoffmann, “The Crisis of Liberal Internationalism,” Foreign Policy 98 (1995): 161.Google Scholar
  15. 13.
    E. H. Carr, The Twenty Years’ Crisis (Edinburgh: R&R Clark, 1942), 43–80.Google Scholar
  16. 14.
    This term is borrowed from Robert W. Cox, “Social Forces, States, and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory,” in Neorealism and Its Critics, ed. Robert O. Keohane (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), 208.Google Scholar
  17. 15.
    Kjell Goldmann, The Logic of Internationalism: Coercion and Accommodation (London: Routledge, 1994), x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 17.
    See for example Doyle, “Kant, Liberal Legacies and Foreign Affairs,” in Debating the Democratic Peace, ed. Michael E. Brown, Sean M. Lynn-Jones and Steven E. Miller (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996), 3–53Google Scholar
  19. Robert O. Keohane, “International Liberalism Reconsidered,” in The Economic Limits to Modern Politics, ed. John Dunn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), 165–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cf. Stanley Hoffmann, Janus and Minerva: Essays on the Theory and Practice of International Politics (Boulder: Westview Press, 1987), 395.Google Scholar
  21. 19.
    John Sylvester Hemleben, Plans for World Peace through Six Centuries (New York: Garland Publishing Company, 1943)Google Scholar
  22. F. H. Hinsley, Power and the Pursuit of Peace: Theory and Practice in the History of Relations Among States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963)Google Scholar
  23. Daniele Archibugi, “Models of International Organization in Perpetual Peace Projects,” Review of International Studies 18, 4 (1992): 295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 20.
    John Locke, Second Treatise of Government (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1980), chaps. 1–3, and esp. 8.Google Scholar
  25. 21.
    see also Michael Joseph Smith, “Liberalism and International Reform,” in Traditions of International Ethics, ed. Terry Nardin and David R. Mapel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 203.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    See, in the case of Woodrow Wilson, Cynthia Weber, Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, the State, and Symbolic Exchange (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), chap. 5.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Inis L. Claude Jr., Swords into Plowshares: The Problems and Progress of International Organization, 4th ed. (New York: Random House, 1984), 51ff.Google Scholar
  28. 29.
    Michael Freeden, New Liberalism: An Ideology of Social Reform (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978).Google Scholar
  29. 30.
    David Long, “The Harvard School of Liberal International Theory: A Case for Closure,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 24, 3 (1995): 502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 32.
    David Long, “Conclusion: Inter-War Idealism, Liberal Internationalism, and Contemporary International Theory,” in Thinkers of the Twenty Years’ Crisis: Inter-War Idealism Reassessed, ed. David Long and Peter Wilson (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), 313.Google Scholar
  31. 33.
    David Mitrany, A Working Peace System (Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1966).Google Scholar
  32. 34.
    Ernst B. Haas, Beyond the Nation-State (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1964).Google Scholar
  33. 35.
    Charles Pentland, Integration Theory and European Integration (London: Faber and Faber, 1973), 70, 81Google Scholar
  34. see also the contributions to Lucian M. Ashworth and David Long, eds., New Perspectives on International Functionalism (Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan, 1999).Google Scholar
  35. 44.
    Richardson, “Contending Liberalisms: Past and Present,” European Journal of International Relations 3, 1 (1997): 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 50.
    David Held, “Cosmopolitan Democracy and the Global Order: Reflections on the 200th Anniversary of Kant’s ‘Perpetual Peace,’” Alternatives 20, 4 (1995): 415–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Daniele Archibugi, “Immanuel Kant, Cosmopolitan Law and Peace,” European Journal of International Relations 1, 4 (1995): 429–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 51.
    Jens Bartelson, “The Trial of Judgment: A Note on Kant and the Paradoxes of Internationalism,” International Studies Quarterly 39, 2 (1995): 256–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 52.
    R. B. J. Walker, Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 161.Google Scholar
  40. 53.
    Jack S. Levy, “Domestic Politics and War,” in The Origin and Prevention of Major Wars, ed. R. I. Rotberg and T. K. Rabb (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 88.Google Scholar
  41. 55.
    Chris Brown, “‘Really Existing Liberalism’ and International Order,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 21, 3 (1992): 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 56.
    Andrew Linklater, Men and Citizens in the Theory of International Relations (London: Macmillan, 1982), 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. see also Linklater, Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations (London: Macmillan, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Linklater, “The Problem of Community in International Relations,” Alternatives 15, 2 (1990): 135–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Linklater, “Citizenship and Sovereignty in the Post-Westphalian State,” European Journal of International Relations 2, 1 (1996): 77–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Linklater, The Transformation of Community: the Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1998), 220.Google Scholar
  47. Cf. Beate Jahn, “One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Critical Theory as the Latest Edition of Liberal Idealism,” Millennium 27, 3 (1998): 613–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Antonio Franceschet 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Franceschet

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations