Framing and the Poliheuristic Theory of Decision: The United Fruit Company and the 1954 U.S.-Led Coup in Guatemala

  • Michelle M. Taylor-Robinson
  • Steven B. Redd
Part of the Advances in Foreign Policy Analysis book series (AFPA)

Abstract

On June 27, 1954, President Jacobo Arbenz Guzmán of Guatemala resigned. His government was threatened with an invasion by a group of exiles led by Lieutenant Colonel Carlos Castillo Armas who were part of a U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)-sponsored covert operation to overthrow Arbenz. Militarily, Castillo Armas’s small band of exiles had not been very successful; however, the intensive psychological battle being waged by the CIA was very intimidating to the people of Guatemala City, the Guatemalan military, and even to President Arbenz. Arbenz felt certain the Guatemalan military could defeat Castillo Armas, but his concern was that the United States would send its own military to invade if he did not back down (Gleijeses 1991, 317–322). Thus, the United States brought an end to the Guatemalan revolution of 1944 and the democratic government it established.The United Fruit Company also got rid of a government that seriously threatened its interests in Guatemala and throughout the region of Central America.This brief period of reform and progress in Guatemala was replaced by a succession of military-led authoritarian regimes and more than three decades of instability and guerrilla warfare.

Keywords

Depression Beach Expense Posit Boulder 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abelson, Robert P., and Ariel Levi. 1985. “Decision Making and Decision Theory.” In The Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd ed., ed. Gardner Lindzey and Elliot Aronson. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  2. Ambrose, Stephen E. 1981. Ike’s Spies: Eisenhower and the Espionage Establishment. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, Paul A. 1983. “Decision Making by Objection and the Cuban Missile Crisis.” Administrative Science Quarterly 28 (June): 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aybar, Jose M. 1978. Dependency and Intervention: The Case of Guatemala in 1954. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beach, Lee Roy. 1990. Image Theory: Decision Making in Personal and Organizational Contexts. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  6. Beach, Lee Roy, and Terence R. Mitchell. 1978. “A Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies.” Academy of Management Review 3 (April): 439–449.Google Scholar
  7. Bernays, Edward L. 1965. Biography of an Idea: Memoirs of Public Relations Counsel Edward L. Bernays. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  8. Billings, Robert S., and Lisa L. Scherer. 1988. “The Effects of Response Mode and Importance on Decision-Making Strategies: Judgment Versus Choice.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 41 (February): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Billings, Robert S, and Stephen A. Marcus. 1983. “Measures of Compensatory and Noncompensatory Models of Decision Behavior: Process Tracing Versus Policy Capturing.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 31 (June): 331–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blasier, Cole. 1976. The Hovering Giant: U.S. Responses to Revolutionary Change in Latin America. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cottam, Martha L. 1994. Images and Intervention: U.S. Policies in Latin America. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  12. DeRouen, Karl R. 1994. “The Decision Not to Use Force: A Noncompensatory Perspective.” Discussion paper 21. Program in Foreign Policy Decision Making, Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
  13. Ebel, Roland. 1996. “Guatemala: Politics in a Central American City-State.” In Latin American Politics and Development, ed. Howard J. Wiarda and Harvey F. Kline, 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  14. Eisenhower, Dwight. 1963. The White House Years: Mandate for Change. vol. 1. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  15. Fiske, Susan T., and Shelley E.Taylor. 1991. Social Cognition, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  16. Ford, J. Kevin, Neal Schmitt, Susan L. Schechtman, Brian M. Hults, and Mary L. Doherty. 1989. “Process Tracing Methods: Contributions, Problems, and Neglected Research Questions.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 43 (February): 75–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frisch, Deborah. 1993. “Reasons for Framing Effects.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 54 (April): 399–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geva, Nehemia, Allison Astorino-Courtois, and Alex Mintz. 1996. “Marketing the Peace Process in the Middle East: The Effectiveness of Thematic and Evaluative Framing in Jordan and Israel.” In Arms Spending, Development and Security, ed. Manas Chatterji, Jacques Fontanel, and Akira Hattori. New Delhi: APH Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Geva, Nehemia, Steven B. Redd, and Alex Mintz. 1996. “Structure and Process in Foreign Policy Decision Making: An Experimental Assessment of Poliheuristic Propositions.” Presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, San Diego, CA, April 16–20.Google Scholar
  20. Gil, Federico G. 1971. Latin American-United States Relations. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  21. Gleijeses, Piero. 1991. Shattered Hope: The Guatemalan Revolution and the United States, 1944–1954. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hogarth, Robin M. 1987. Judgement and Choice: The Psychology of Decision, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  23. Hybel, Alex Roberto. 1990. How Leaders Reason: US Intervention in the Caribbean Basin and Latin America. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. Immerman, Richard H. 1982. The CIA in Guatemala: The Foreign Policy of Intervention. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.” Econometrica 47: 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. LaFeber, Walter. 1993. Inevitable Revolutions: The United States in Central America, 2nd ed. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  27. Lehman, Kenneth. 1997. “Revolutions and Attributions: Making Sense of Eisenhower Administration Policies in Bolivia and Guatemala.” Diplomatic History 21 (Spring): 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Levy, Jack S. 1992a. “An Introduction to Prospect Theory.” Political Psychology 13 (2): 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levy, Jack S. 1992b. “Prospect Theory and International Relations: Theoretical Applications and Analytical Problems.” Political Psychology 13 (2): 283–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maoz, Zeev. 1990. “Framing the National Interest: The Manipulation of Foreign Policy Decisions in Group Settings.” World Politics 43 (October): 77–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCann, Thomas. 1967. An American Company: The Tragedy of United Fruit. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  32. Melville, Thomas, and Marjorie Melville. 1971. Guatemala: The Politics of Land Ownership. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  33. Mintz, Alex. 1993. “The Decision to Attack Iraq: A Noncompensatory Theory of Decision Making.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 37 (December): 595–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mintz, Alex. 1995. “The ‘Noncompensatory Principle’ of Coalition Formation.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 7 (July): 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mintz, Alex. 1997. “Foreign Policy Decisionmaking: Bridging the Gap Between the Cognitive Psychology and Rational Actor Schools.” In Decisionmaking on War and Peace: The Cognitive-Rational Debate, ed. Nehemia Geva and Alex Mintz. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  36. Mintz, Alex, and Nehemia Geva. 1997. “The Poliheuristic Theory of Foreign Policy Decision Making.” In Decisionmaking on War and Peace: The Cognitive-Rational Debate, ed. Nehemia Geva and Alex Mintz. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  37. Mintz, Alex, and Nehemia Geva. 1998. “The Poliheuristic Theory of Decision.” Mimeo.Google Scholar
  38. Mintz, Alex, Nehemia Geva, Steven B. Redd, and Amy Carnes. 1997. “The Effect of Dynamic and Static Choice Sets on Political Decision Making: An Analysis Using the Decision Board Platform.” American Political Science Review 91 (3): 553–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Molineu, Harold. 1986. U.S. Policy Toward Latin America: From Regionalism to Globalism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  40. Payne, John W., James R. Bettman, and Eric J. Johnson. 1988. “Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14 (July): 534–552.Google Scholar
  41. Payne, John W., James R. Bettman, and Eric J. Johnson. 1993. The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rabe, Stephen G. 1988. Eisenhower and Latin America: The Foreign Policy of Anticommunism. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  43. Rabe, Stephen G. 1990. “Dulles, Latin America, and Cold War Anticommunism.” In John Foster Dulles and the Diplomacy of the Cold War, ed. Richard H. Immerman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Schlesinger, Stephen, and Stephen Kinzer. 1982. Bitter Fruit: The Untold Story of the American Coup in Guatemala. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  45. Schneider, Ronald M. 1958. Communism in Guatemala, 1944–1954. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  46. Tetlock, Philip E. 1992. “The Impact of Accountability on Judgment and Choice: Toward a Social Contingency Model.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. Mark P. Zanna. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  47. Tetlock, Philip E, and Richard Boettger. 1989. “Accountability: A Social Magnifier of the Dilution Effect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 (September): 388–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211 (January): 453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Alex Mintz 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michelle M. Taylor-Robinson
  • Steven B. Redd

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations