Advertisement

The Decision Not to Use Force at Dien Bien Phu: A Poliheuristic Perspective

  • Karl DeRouenJr.
Part of the Advances in Foreign Policy Analysis book series (AFPA)

Abstract

The foreign policy decision-making literature has largely ignored nonevents. However, the study of nonevents can make decision-making theory richer by broadening its explanatory powers. Nonevent emphasis will provide valuable information for, as Holsti (1992, 453) asserts, “[s]olid evidence about contemporary non-events is, to understate the case, rather hard to come by.” One means of probing nonevents is through the case study. The main merit of the crisis case study is that it allows the researcher a more detailed look at cognitive processes and background factors. It is difficult to exaggerate the importance of detailed case studies, particularly since they can be used as foundations for formal models (Singer and Hudson 1992, 256). Finally, the case study pays greater attention to detail and complexity than either the statistical or the experimental approaches (Tetlock 1989, 358).

Keywords

Foreign Policy American Political Science Review Political Dimension Domestic Politics Cybernetic Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avella, John. 1991. “Evaluating Criteria for the Use of Force.” Comparative Strategy 10: 217–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Billings, R. and S. Marcus. 1983. “Measures of Compensatory and Noncompensatory Models of Decision Behavior: Process Tracing versus Policy Capturing.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 31: 331–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Billings-Yun, Melanie. 1988. Decision Against War: Eisenhower and Dien Bien Phu, 1954. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brands, H. 1987–88. “Decisions on American Armed Intervention: Lebanon, Dominican Republic, and Grenada.” Political Science Quarterly 102: 607–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brannick, M. and J. Brannick. 1989. “Nonlinear and Noncompensatory Processes in Performance Evaluation.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 44: 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brecher, Michael, John Wilkenfeld, and S. Moser. 1988. Crises in the Twentieth Century. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce and David Lalman. 1992. Reason and War. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bundy, W. 1987. “The Relative Importance of Force.” In Democracy, Strategy, and Vietnam, ed. G. Osborn, A. Clark IV, D. Kaufman, and D. Lute. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  9. Burke, J. and Fred Greenstein. 1989. How Presidents Test Reality. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Dawes, Robyn. 1964. “Social Selection Based on Multi-Dimensional Criteria.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 68: 104–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeRouen, Karl Jr. 2001. Politics, Economics and Presidential Use of Force Decision Making. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  12. Draper, T. 1974. “Eisenhower and Vietnam: A Liberal Interpretation.” In The Eisenhower Era, ed. P. Holbo and R. Sollen. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
  13. Einhorn, H. 1971. “Use of Nonlinear, Noncompensatory Models as a Function of Task and Amount of Information.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 6: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eisenhower, Dwight. 1963. Mandate for Change, vol. 1. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  15. Ewald, W. 1981. Eisenhower the President. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Fall, B. 1966. Hell in a Very Small Place: The Siege of Dien Bien Phu. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company.Google Scholar
  17. Falk, Stephen. 1969. “The National Security Council Under Truman, Eisenhower, and Kennedy.” In The Presidency, ed. Aaron Wildavsky. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  18. Foyle, David. 1997. “Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Elite Beliefs as a Mediating Variable.” International Studies Quarterly 41: 141–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geva, Nehemia, Karl DeRouen, and Alex Mintz. 1993. “The Political Incentive Explanation of ‘Democratic Peace’: Evidence From Experimental Research.” International Interactions 18: 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geva, Nehemia, and Alex Mintz. 1993. “Decision Processes and Contents in the Gulf War: A Noncompensatory Multidimensional Theory of the Use of Force.” Texas A&M University. Typescript.Google Scholar
  21. Gravel, M. 1971. The Pentagon Papers, vol. 1. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  22. Grossman, M., and M. Kumar. 1981. Portraying the President. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hampson, Fen. 1988. “The Divided Decision-Maker: American Domestic Politics and the Cuban Crises.” In The Domestic Sources of American Foreign Policy, ed. Charles Kegley and Eugene Wittkopf. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  24. Herring, G., and Richard Immerman. 1984. “Eisenhower, Dulles, and Dien Bien Phu: ‘The Day We Didn’t Go to War’ Revisited.” Journal of American History 71: 343–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holsti, Ole. 1992. “Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann Consensus—Mershon Series: Research Programs and Debates.” International Studies Quarterly 36: 439–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. James, Patrick, and John Oneal. 1991. “The Influence of Domestic and International Politics on the President’s Use of Force.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 35: 307–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Joes, Anthony. 1992. Modern Guerilla Insurgency. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  28. Johnson, E., and R. Meyer. 1984. “Compensatory Choice Models of Noncompen-satory Processes: The Effect of Varying Context.” Journal of Consumer Research 11: 528–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levy, Jack. 1989. “The Diversionary Theory of War: A Critique.” In Handbook of War Studies, ed. Manus Midlarsky. Boston: Unw in Hyman.Google Scholar
  30. Meernik, James. 1991. “Presidential Decision Making and Political Uses of Force.” Ph.D. dissertation. Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  31. Meernik, James. 1994. “Presidential Decision Making and the Political Use of Force.” International Studies Quarterly 38: 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mintz, Alex. 1993. “The Decision to Attack Iraq: A Non-Compensatory Theory of Decision Making.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 37: 595–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mintz, Alex, and Nehemia Geva. 1997. “The Poliheuristc Theory of Foreign Policy Decision Making.” In Decision-making on War and Peace, ed. Nehemia Geva and Alex Mintz. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  34. Mintz, Alex, Nehemia Geva, and Karl DeRouen. 1994. “Mathematical Models of Foreign Policy Decision Making: Compensatory vs. Noncompensatory.” Synthese 100: 441–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mintz, Alex, Nehemia Geva, Steve Redd, and Amy Carnes. 1997. “The Effect of Dynamic and Static Choice Sets on Political Decision Making: An Analysis Using the Decision Board Platform.” American Political Science Review 91: 553–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Most, Benjamin, and Harvey Starr. 1989. Inquiry, Logic and International Politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  37. Orbovich, C., and R. Molnar. 1992. “Modeling Foreign Policy Advisory Processes.” In Political Psychology and Foreign Policy, ed. E. Singer and V. Hudson. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  38. Ostrom, Charles, and Brian Job. 1986. “The President and the Political Use of Force.” American Political Science Review 80: 541–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paige, G. 1972. “Comparative Case Analysis of Crisis Decisions: Korea and Cuba.” In International Crises, ed. C. Hermann. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  40. Payne, J. 1976. “Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Decision Making: An Information Search and Protocol Analysis.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16: 366–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Payne, J., J. Bettman, and E. Johnson. 1988. “Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 14: 534–552.Google Scholar
  42. Ripley, Brian. 1993. “Psychology, Foreign Policy, and International Relations Theory.” Political Psychology 14: 403–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roberts, C. 1954. “The Day We Didn’t Go to War.” The Reporter, September 14.Google Scholar
  44. Robinson, J. 1962. Congress and Foreign Policy-Making. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  45. Sage, A. 1990. “Human Judgement and Decision Rules.” In Concise Encyclopedia of Information Processing in Systems and Organizations, ed. A. Sage. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  46. Saunders, R. 1985. “Military Force in the Foreign Policy of the Eisenhower Presidency.” Political Science Quarterly 100: 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simon, Herbert. 1959. “Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science.” American Economic Review 49: 253–283.Google Scholar
  48. Simon, Herbert. 1985. “Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science.” American Political Science Review 79: 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Singer, E., and V. Hudson. 1992. “Conclusion: Political Psychology/Foreign Policy, the Cognitive Revolution, and International Relations.” In Political Psychology and Foreign Policy, ed. E. Singer and V. Hudson. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  50. Steinbruner, John. 1974. The Cybernetic Theory of Decision. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Steiner, Miriam. 1983. “The Search for Order in a Disorderly World: Worldviews and Prescriptive Decision Paradigms.” International Organization 37: 373–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tetlock, Phillip. 1989. “Methodological Themes and Variations.” In Behavior, Society, and Nuclear War, ed. Phillip Tetlock et al. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Tversky, Amos. 1972. “Elimination by Aspects: A Theory of Choice.” Psychological Review 79: 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. U.S. News and World Report. 1954. “Did U.S. Almost Get into War?” June 18.Google Scholar
  55. U.S. State Department. 1982. Foreign Relations of the U.S., vol. 13, ed. J. Glennon. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Alex Mintz 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl DeRouenJr.

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations