Skip to main content

Integrating Cognitive and Rational Theories of Foreign Policy Decision Making: A Poliheuristic Perspective

  • Chapter
Integrating Cognitive and Rational Theories of Foreign Policy Decision Making

Part of the book series: Advances in Foreign Policy Analysis ((AFPA))

Abstract

There are currently two “schools” of thought in political decision making in general and foreign policy decision making in particular: the rational choice school and the cognitive psychology school. This book introduces a theory of decision making that integrates elements of both schools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brams, Steven J. 1985. Superpower Games. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 1981. The War Trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and David Lalman.1992. War and Reason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRouen, Karl. 2000. “Presidents and the Diversionary Use of Force.” International Studies Quarterly (June).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geva, Nehemia, Steven Redd, and Alex Mintz. 2000. “Structure and Process in Foreign Policy Decision Making: An Experimental Assessment of Poliheuristic Propositions.” Discussion paper, Program in Foreign Policy Decision Making, Texas A&M University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Jack S. 1997. “Prospect Theory and the Cognitive-Rational Debate.” In Decision Making on War and Peace: The Cognitive-Rational Debate, ed. Nehemia Geva and Alex Mintz. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Alex. 1993. “The Decision to Attack Iraq: A Noncompensatory Theory of Decision Making.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 37(4): 595–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Alex. 1995. “The ‘Noncompensatory Principle’ of Coalition Formation.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 7 (3): 335–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Alex. 1997. “Foreign Policy Decision Making: Bridging the Gap Between the Cognitive Psychology and Rational Actor Schools.” In Decision Making on War and Peace: The Cognitive-Rational Debate, ed. Nehemia Geva and Alex Mintz. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Alex. 1999a. “The Poliheuristic Theory of War and Peace Decision Making.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA (September).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Alex. 1999b. “The Decision Board Software for Teaching and Research in International Relations.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA (September).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Alex, and Allison Astorino-Courtois. 2001. “Simulating Decision Processes: Expanding the Poliheuristic Theory to Model N-person Strategic Interactions in International Relations.” Presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Alex, and Nehemia Geva. 1997. “The Poliheuristic Theory of Foreign Policy Decision Making.” In Decision Making on War and Peace: The Cognitive-Rational Debate, ed. Nehemia Geva and Alex Mintz. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Alex, Nehemia Geva, Steven Redd, and Amy Carnes. 1997. “The Effect of Dynamic Versus Static Choice Sets on Strategy and Outcome in Political Decision Making.” American Political Science Review (91): 553–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, James. 1997. “A Rational Choice Approach to International Conflict.” In Decision Making on War and Peace: The Cognitive-Rational Debate, ed. Nehemia Geva and Alex Mintz. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redd, Steven. 1998. “Linking Processes to Outcomes.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redd, Steven. 2000. “The Effect of Advisors on Strategy and Choice in Foreign Policy Decision Making.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, Texas A&M University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russett, Bruce M., and Gad Barzilai. 1992. “The Political Economy of Military Actions: The United States and Israel.” In The Political Economy of Military Spending in the United States, ed. A. Mintz. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert. 1957. Models of Man. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbruner, John. 1974. The Cybernetic Theory of Decision: New Dimensions of Political Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taber, Charles, and M. R. Steenbergen. 1995. “Computational Experiments in Electoral Behavior.” In Political Judgment, ed. M. Lodge and K. M. McGraw. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertzberger, Yaakov. 1998. The World in Their Minds. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Stephen G. 1998. “Models of Foreign Policy Decisions: Rivals or Partners?” Mershon International Studies Review 42 (2): 343–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Alex Mintz

Copyright information

© 2003 Alex Mintz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mintz, A. (2003). Integrating Cognitive and Rational Theories of Foreign Policy Decision Making: A Poliheuristic Perspective. In: Mintz, A. (eds) Integrating Cognitive and Rational Theories of Foreign Policy Decision Making. Advances in Foreign Policy Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07848-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics