Rewriting the Christian Apocalypse as a Science-Fictional Event

  • Edward James

Abstract

The anonymous author of The Epic of Gilgamesh, Homer, Plato, Lucian of Samosata, Jonathan Swift, and many others, have at one time or another been proclaimed as progenitors of science fiction: no-one in print, as far as I know, perhaps out of misplaced reverence, has suggested St John of Patmos, the author of the Book of Revelation.1 Yet he is one of the most widely quoted and influential of all writers on the future: the symbolic creator of a prophetic tradition that has influenced much more secular approaches to speculation about the future, and his Book survives to this day as an influential and powerful way of imagining the future. Utopian thinkers and activists have drawn on the apocalyptic theme of the millennium for their visions of the perfect world; the dramatic tales of cosmic struggle to be found in the Book of Revelation are comparable in the sweep and the ‘sense of wonder’ that they evoke to the most extravagent space operas of the science-fictional tradition. In this paper, I shall look at some of the interactions between what we might see as rival eschatologies: the vision of the end of all things presented in Jewish and Christian revelation (the Greek word for which gives us ‘apocalypse’) and the view of the end of all things presented by science fiction.

Keywords

Clay Dust Depression Europe Dition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 3.
    Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, I (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1954), pp. 88-89; quoted in A. A. Hoekema, The Four Great Cults (Exeter: Paternoster, 1963), p. 71.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    W. S. Towner, in B. M. Metzger and M. D. Coogan, eds., The Oxford Companion to the Bible (New York: Oxford UP, 1993), p. 151.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    On the role of the Antichrist in eschatological thought, see Bernard McGinn, Antichrist: Two Thousand Years of the Human Fascination with Evil (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1994).Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    Quoted in B. McGinn, ‘Early Apocalypticism: the ongoing debate’, in C. A. Patrides and J. Wittreich, eds., The Apocalypse in English Renaissance Thought and Literature (Manchester: Manchester UP, 1984), 2–39, at 28.Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    D. Fergusson, ‘Eschatology’, in Colin E. Gunton, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Christian Doctrine (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997), pp. 226–244, at p. 241.Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    Norman Cohn, The Pursuit of the Millennium: Revolutionary Millenarians and the Mystical Anarchists of the Middle Ages (rev. ed., London: Temple Smith, 1970).Google Scholar
  7. 10.
    See, for instance, C. Hill, Antichrist in Seventeenth-Century England (rev. ed., London: Verso, 1990), and The English Bible and the Seventeenth-Century Revolution (London: Allen Lane, 1993).Google Scholar
  8. 12.
    Hill, Antichrist in Seventeenth-Century England (1st ed., Oxford: Oxford UP, 1971), p. 159.Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    M. Reeves, The Influence of Prophecy in the Later Middle Ages: A Study in Joachism (Oxford: Oxford UP, 1969), p. 508.Google Scholar
  10. 14.
    Paul Boyer, When Time Shall Be No More: Prophecy Belief in Modern American Culture (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP, 1992), p. 15.Google Scholar
  11. 16.
    W. Warren Wagar, Terminal Visions: The Literature of Last Things (Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1982), p. 33.Google Scholar
  12. 18.
    E. F. Bleiler, Science Fiction: The Early Years (Kent, Ohio: Kent State UP, 1990), p. 55.Google Scholar
  13. 45.
    Stephen D. O’Leary, Arguing the Apocalyptic: A Theory of Millennial Rhetoric (New York and Oxford: Oxford UP, 1994): ch. 6, ‘Hal Lindsey and the Apocalypse of the Twentieth Century’, pp. 134-71.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward James

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations