Abstract
‘What does the Apocalypse matter, unless in so far as it gives us imaginative release into another vital world? After all, what meaning has the Apocalypse? For the ordinary reader, not much.’1 D. H. Lawrence’s questions pave the way for an argument to demonstrate that the Apocalypse does matter because it gives us access to a near-defunct symbolistic mode of thought whose rediscovery can re-energize the individual’s relation to the cosmos. In his own slim volume Apocalypse (1931) he engages in a process of excavation to gain access to the ancient pagan work he is convinced lies embedded within the biblical text building up to a rhapsodic climax celebrating connectedness: ‘I am part of the sun as my eye is part of me’.2 Of course, Lawrence is here pursuing a strategy common to other Modernists of rediscovering (and idealizing) aspects of ancient culture in order to expose absences in the present. More generally, he sets a twentieth-century keynote in interpreting Apocalypse to suit his own preconceptions, and by so doing approaches an oxymoron which will recur throughout this collection: ‘secular apocalypse’.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Edward D. McDonald (ed.), Phoenix: The Posthumous Papers of D.H. Lawrence (London: Heinemann, 1961), p. 294. From a preface to Frederick Carter’s The Dragon of the Apocalypse.
D. H. Lawrence, Apocalypse (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1974), p. 126.
Paul K. Alkon, Origins of Futuristic Fiction (Athens, Ga.: University of Georgia Press, 1987), pp. 160, 170.
Simon Newcomb, ‘The End of the World’, in David G. Hartwell and L. W. Curredy, eds., The Battle of the Monsters and Other Stories (Boston: Gregg Press, 1976), pp. 194, 195.
Frank Kermode, The Sense of an Ending: Studies in the Theory of Fiction (New York: Oxford University Press, 1967), p. 96.
Leslie A. Fiedler, Waiting for the End: The American Literary Scene from Hemingway to Baldwin (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1967), p. 196.
Robert Philmus and David Y. Hughes, eds., Early Writings in Science and Science Fiction by H.G. Wells (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1975), p. 172.
W. Warren Wagar, Terminal Visions: The Literature of Last Things (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982), p. 188.
Nevil Shute, On the Beach (London: Heinemann, 1957), p. 312.
J. G. Ballard, The Terminal Beach (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1966), p. 140.
Paul Brians, Nuctear Holocausts: Atomic War in Fiction, 1895–1984 (Kent, Oh.: Kent State University Press, 1987), pp. 54–5.
David Ketterer, New Worlds for Old: The Apocalyptic Imagination, Science Fiction, and American Literature (Garden City, NY: Anchor, 1974), p. 13.
George R. Stewart, Earth Abides (London: Corgi, 1973), p. 122.
Gary K. Wolfe, ‘The Remaking of Zero: Beginning at the End’, in Eric S. Rabkin, Martin H. Greenberg, and Joseph D. Olander (eds.), The End of the World (Carbondale, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press, 1983), pp. 1–19.
Ralph Ellison, Invisible Man (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1976), p. 464.
Martin Luther King, Jr., Why We Can’t Wait (New York: Signet, 1964), p. 15.
Martha A. Bartter, ‘Nuclar Holocaust as Urban Renewal’, Science-Fiction Studies, 13.iî (1986), pp. 148–58.
Peter George, Dr. Strangelove Or, How I learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988), p. 144.
Krishan Kumar, ‘Apocalypse, Millenium and Utopia Today’ in Malcolm Bull, ed., Apocalypse Theory and the Ends of the World (Oxford: Blackwell, 1995), p. 212.
Hans Magnus Enzensberger, ‘Two Notes on the End of the World’, New Left Review, 110 (July-August, 1978), p. 74.
J. G. Ballard, ‘Cataclysms and Dooms’, in Brian Ash, ed., The Visual Encyclopedia of Science Fiction (London: Pan, 1977), p. 130. Brian Stableford argues differently that disasters are always heavily moralized: ‘All societies–and perhaps all individuals–sanction the belief that some people deserve to suffer, and that when catastrophe strikes the guilty the moral order of the universe is being conserved’ (‘Man-Made Catastrophes’, in Rabkin, Greenberg and Chander, p. 97).
Susan Sontag, Against Interpretation and Other Essays (London: André Deutsch, 1987), pp. 212, 213.
Anthony Burgess, The End of the World News: An Entertainment (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1983), p. viii.
Robert Silverberg, ‘When We Went to See the End of the World’, in Terry Carr, ed., Universe 2 (London: Dennis Dobson, 1972), p. 50.
Madison Smartt Bell, Waiting for the End of the World (London: Sphere, 1986), p. 174.
Lois Parkinson Zamora, Writing the Apocalypse: Historical Vision in Contemporary U.S. and Latin American Fiction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 15–16.
Jacques Derrida, ‘NO APOCALYPSE, NOT NOW’ (full speed ahead, seven missiles, seven missives)’, Diacritics, 14.iî (1984), p. 23.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Seed, D. (2000). Introduction: Aspects of Apocalypse. In: Seed, D. (eds) Imagining Apocalypse. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07657-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07657-1_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-62247-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-07657-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)