Abstract

The debate over the past in Russia has followed a trajectory much different than in Poland and East Germany. In Russia, the process of coming to terms with the past began in 1987, four years before the country moved from its agenda of gradual reform to a radical break with the communist system. The process started earlier than in Poland and East Germany, well before democratization seemed inevitable. During the period of glasnost ’ [openness], the media and the new independent civic organizations began telling the truth about past injustices. Truth-telling by groups outside the government became the general pattern for dealing with the legacy of the past. This public discussion about the country’s dark historical moments paralleled political discussions about reforms, but it was curiously disengaged from these changes. Unlike in Poland and East Germany, Russian politicians did not make a connection between condemning past abuses and reforming the institutions responsible for them.

Keywords

Europe Explosive Expense Tate Arena 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    For discussion of liberal democratic ideology in Russia, see Ken Jowitt, “Undemocratic Past, Unnamed Present, Undecided Future,” Demokratizatsiya, 4, 3 (Summer 1996): 409–19; Roundtable discussion, “The Russian Historical Tradition and Prospects of Liberal Reforms,” Russian Social Science Review, 40, 2 (March-April 1999): 48–76.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Robert Conquest, The Great Terror: A Reassessment (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990), 485–486; Anne Applebaum, Gulag: A History of the Soviet Camps (New York: Random House, 2003), 515–522; Alexander N. Yakovlev, A Century of Violence in Soviet Russia, with a foreword by Paul Hollander, trans. Anthony Austin (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2002), 233–234.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Aleksander Yakovlev, ed., Reabilitatsia: Politicheskieprotsessy 30–50-xgodov (Moscow: Izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1991), 7.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    Albert P. van Goudoever, The Limits of Destalinization in the Soviet Union: Political Rehabilitations in the Soviet Union since Stalin, trans. Frans Hijkoop (London: Croom Helm, 1986), 3, 77. See also Stephen G. Wheatcroft, “Glasnost’ and Rehabilitations,” in Facing Up to the Past: Soviet Historiography under Perestroika, ed. Takayuki Ito (Sapporo, Japan: Slavic Research Center, Hokkaido University, 1989), 199–200.Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    N.F. Katkov, “Vosstanovlenie istoricheskoi pravdy i spravedlivosti,” Voprosy istorii KPSS, 9 (1991): 85.Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    See Peter Hauslohner, “Politics before Gorbachev: De-Stalinization and the Roots of Reform,” chap. 2 in Politics, Society, and Nationality Inside Gorbachev’s Russia, ed. Seweryn Bialer (Boulder: Westview, 1989), 46– 48.Google Scholar
  7. 10.
    Peter Juviler, Freedom’s Ordeal: The Struggle for Human Rights and Democratization in Post-Soviet States (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998), 57.Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    David S. Mason and Svetlana Sidorenko-Stephenson, “Public Opinion and the 1996 Elections in Russia: Nostalgic and Statist, Yet Pro-Market and Pro-Yeltsin,” Slavic Review, 56, 4 (Winter 1997): 711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 14.
    See Murray Yanowitch, Controversies in Soviet Social Thought: Democratization, Social Justice and the Erosion of Official Ideology (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1991), 28, 58–59.Google Scholar
  10. 15.
    Mikhail Gorbachev, Perestroika: New Thinking for Our Country and the World (New York: Harper & Row, 1987), 40, 43.Google Scholar
  11. 16.
    Robert William Davies, Soviet History in the Gorbachev Revolution (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1989), vii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 18.
    Rosalind Marsh, History and Literature in Contemporary Russia (London: Macmillan, 1995), 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 20.
    Yegor Ligachev, Inside Gorbachev’s Kremlin, with an introduction by Stephen F. Cohen, trans. Catherine Fitzpatrick et al. (New York: Random House, 1993), 294, 287.Google Scholar
  14. 25.
    For this point, see Seweryn Bialer, “The Changing Soviet Political System: The Nineteenth Party Conference and After,” chap. 7 in Politics, Society, and Nationality Inside Gorbachev’s Russia, ed. Seweryn Bialer (Boulder: Westview, 1989), 236.Google Scholar
  15. 30.
    Walter Laquer, Stalin: The Glasnost’ Revelations (New York: Macmillan, 1990), 264–265. See also the call for a trial of Stalinism in Moskovskie novosti, August 27, 1989, 4.Google Scholar
  16. 34.
    Andrei Sakharov, Moscow and Beyond, 1986–1989, trans. Antonina Bouis (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1991), 152–153; Giuliette Chiesa, Transition to Democracy: Political Change in the Soviet Union, 1987– 1991 (Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1993), 124–125.Google Scholar
  17. 35.
    Judith Devlin, The Rise of the Russian Democrats: The Causes and Consequences of the Elite Revolution (Hants: Edward Elgar, 1995), 68.Google Scholar
  18. 38.
    Jerry F. Hough, Democratization and Revolution in the USSR, 1985–1991 (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1997), 300.Google Scholar
  19. 40.
    Yurii Afanasiev, “Perestroika i istoricheskoe znanie” in Inogo ne dano (Moscow: Progress, 1988), 499.Google Scholar
  20. 60.
    Amy Knight, Spies Without Cloaks: The KGB’s Successors (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996), 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 75.
    Timothy J. Colton, Transitional Citizens: Voters and What Influences Them in the New Russia (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000), 149–150, 172.Google Scholar
  22. 81.
    Eduard Batalov, “Chem zapolnim ideinyi vakkum?” Svobodnaia mysl ’, 11 (1996): 4, 7.Google Scholar
  23. 102.
    Robert Conquest, The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collectivization and the Terror-Famine (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Noel Calhoun 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Noel Calhoun

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations