Liberal Democratic Ideology and Transitional Justice

  • Noel Calhoun

Abstract

From South Africa to Eastern Europe, in diverse contexts of democratization, societies have sought answers to the dilemmas of justice in regime transitions, analyzing their options in light of liberal democratic norms. Thus, it is worth attempting a systematic answer to the question: Is there a liberal democratic model for coming to terms with past injustices? This chapter constructs an “ideal-type” of a liberal democratic approach to transitional justice. Laying bare the central elements of this model will help us to achieve two goals. First, it will enable us to make sense of the current debates and policy decisions, exposing the assumptions that shape the debates and highlighting the common themes. Second, better theoretical explication will help us to make a principled, reasoned prescription for how countries might come to terms with the past in a way that best promotes a liberal democratic future.

Keywords

Europe Assure Expense Smoke Sine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    J.M. Kelly, A Short History of Western Legal Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992), 13.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    John Locke, “The Second Treatise of Government,” in Two Treatises of Government, ed. Peter Laslett, rev. ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960), 404.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anthony Arblaster, The Rise and Decline of Western Liberalism (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984), 73.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, ed. C.B. Macpherson (London: Penguin Books, 1968), 186.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Mark J. Osiel, “Ever Again: Legal Remembrance of Administrative Massacre,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 144, 2 (December 1995): 587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 7.
    See Louis Hartz, The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of American Political Thought Since the Revolution (San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovic, 1983).Google Scholar
  7. 14.
    See Noel Calhoun, “The Statute of Limitations and the Prosecution of Human Rights Violations,” in 1989–1999 Transformations: Triumph or Tragedy? (New York: Harriman Institute, 2000).Google Scholar
  8. 16.
    Ruti G. Teitel, Transitional Justice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 40– 44.Google Scholar
  9. 17.
    Juan E. Mendez, “In Defense of Transitional Justice,” chap. 1 in A. James McAdams, ed., Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1997), 7–8.Google Scholar
  10. 20.
    Bruce Ackerman, The Future of Liberal Revolution (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992), 96.Google Scholar
  11. 23.
    John W. Chapman, ed., Compensatory Justice, Nomos XXXIII (New York: New York University Press, 1991), 126.Google Scholar
  12. 24.
    Anne Sa’adah, Germany’s Second Chance: Trust, Justice, and Democratization (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998), 1–3, 238.Google Scholar
  13. 27.
    Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, new edition (New York: Harcourt, Brace And World, 1966), 385.Google Scholar
  14. 28.
    Hannah Arendt, Between Past and Future (New York: Penguin, 1993).Google Scholar
  15. 29.
    David A. Welch, Justice and the Genesis of War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 30.
    Judith N. Shklar, The Faces of Injustice (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990), 107.Google Scholar
  17. 31.
    John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, with an introduction by Gertrude Himmelfarb (New York: Penguin, 1988), 141.Google Scholar
  18. 32.
    Diane Orentlicher, “Settling Accounts: The Duty to Punish Human Rights Violations of a Prior Regime” in Transitional Justice, v. I, ed. Neil Kritz (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  19. 34.
    Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem (New York: Penguin, 1994), 298.Google Scholar
  20. 35.
    Marina Thode, “Towards Democracy: Criminal Law, Criminal Justice and the Reunification of Germany,” in Democracy, Market Economy, and the Law: Legal, Economic, and Political Problems of Transition to Democracy, ed. Werner F. Ebke and Detlev F. Vagts (Heidelberg: Verlag Recht und Wirtschaft GmbH, 1995). In German the quotation reads: “Wir wollten Gerechtigkeit und haben den Rechtsstaat bekommen.”Google Scholar
  21. 37.
    Michael Rosenfeld, “Restitution, Retribution, Political Justice and the Rule of Law,” Constellations, 2, 3 (January 1996): 309. Walzer writes (in Regicide and Revolution, 248) that the problem of political justice is “how to vindicate the rule of law in spite of, or even against, the rules of pure procedural justice.”CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Noel Calhoun 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Noel Calhoun

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations