Advertisement

The Politics of Transitional Justice

  • Noel Calhoun

Abstract

Why do some countries in transition collapse into violence while others try to forget the past? Why have yet others, especially in recent transitions, adopted a strategy of legal redress and truth-telling?

Keywords

Political Actor Political Discourse Liberal Democracy Transitional Justice Democratic Transition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Barrington Moore, Jr., The Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World (Boston: Beacon Press, 1966), 20, 505–508.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Theda Skocpol, States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979), 163–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dick Howard, “Toward a Politics of Judgement,” Constellations, 1, 2 (1994): 290.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kay Trimberger, Revolution from Above: Military Bureaucrats in Development in Japan, Turkey, Egypt, and Peru (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1978), 2.Google Scholar
  5. See also Michael Walzer, Regicide and Revolution (New York: Columbia University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    George J. Szablowski and Hans-Ulrich Derlien, “East European Transitions, Elites, Bureaucracies, and the European Community,” Governance, 6, 3 (July 1993): 308. The degree to which the Romanian revolutionary leadership ultimately reshaped society is quite debatable, however.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    Samuel P. Huntington, The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991), 215–216, 228.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Alexandra Barahona de Brito, Carmen Gonzalez-Enriquez, and Paloma Aguilar, The Politics of Memory: Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 11–14; Huntington, The Third Wave, 228.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    Vera Tolz, “New Situation for CPSU and KGB Archives,” Radio Liberty, 3, 38 (September 28, 1991): 1–4, and Carla Thorson, “Has the Communist Party Been Legally Suspended?” Radio Liberty, 3, 40 (October 4, 1991): 4–8.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    This is the approach adopted by Barahona de Brito in an important comparative study of transitional justice in Uruguay and Chile. She examines how several political factors affected the outcomes in those countries: the nature and strength of human rights movements; the relationship between the opposition party and the human rights organizations; the degree of opposition party unity; and the role of the democratically elected executive. She argues that a series of complex interactions among these factors yields the different outcomes in the two countries she studies. See Alexandra Barahona de Brito, Human Rights and Democratization in Latin America: Uruguay and Chile (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kathryn Sikkink, “Human Rights, Principled Issue-Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America,” International Organization, 47, 3 (Summer 1993): 416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ibid., 438–439, and Susan E. Waltz, Human Rights and Reform: Changing the Face of North African Politics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995), 21–30.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jack A. Goldstone, Revolution and Rebellion in the Early Modern World (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991), 49, emphasis in original.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ann Swidler, “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies,” American Sociological Review, 51, 2 (April 1986): 278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 16.
    Paul Chilton and Christina Schaeffner, “Discourse and Politics,” chap. 8 in Discourse as Social Interaction (London: Sage Publications, 1997), vol. 2, Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Approach, ed. Teun A. Van Dijk, 214–222. Teun A. Van Dijk, “Discourse as Interaction in Society,” chap. 1 in Discourse as Social Interaction (Lond: Sage Publications, 1997), vol. 2, Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Approach, ed. Teun A. Van Dijk, 214–222. Michel Foucault, “The Order of Discourse,” chap. 7 in Language and Politics, ed. Michael J. Shapiro (New York: New York University Press, 1984), 116. Robert Wuthnow, Communities of Discourse: Ideology and Social Structure in the Reformation, the Enlightenment, and European Socialism (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989), 13–16.Google Scholar
  16. 17.
    Ludwig Wittgenstein also makes an analogy between language and a toolkit. See Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, Wittgenstein and Justice: On the Significance of Ludwig Wittgenstein for Social and Political Thought (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972), 36–37.Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    Murray Edelman, Constructing the Political Spectacle (Chicag: University of Chicago Press, 1988), 12; John A. Robinson and Linda Hawpe, “Narrative Thinking as a Heuristic Process,” chap. 6 in Narrative Psychology: The Stoned Nature of Human Conduct, ed. Theodore R. Sarbin (New York: Praeger, 1986), 113.Google Scholar
  18. 19.
    Mary Ann Glendon, Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse (New York: Free Press, 1991).Google Scholar
  19. 20.
    Richard Ashcraft, Revolutionary Politics and Locke’s Two Treatises of Government (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986), 5.Google Scholar
  20. 21.
    Walter R. Fisher, “Narrative, Reason, and Community,” chap. 14 in Memory, Identity, Community: The Idea of Narrative in the Human Sciences, ed. Lewis P. Hinchman and Sandra K. Hinchman (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997), 314.Google Scholar
  21. 22.
    Seyla Benhabib, “Deliberative Rationality and Models of Democratic Legitimacy,” Constellations, 1, 1 (1994): 32–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 25.
    In Poland, commentators frequently use phrases like “coming back to normal” or “borrowing from the tested models” to describe their country’s embrace of liberal democratic norms. See Wojciech Sokolewicz, “The Relevance of Western Models for Constitution-Building in Poland,” chap. 11 in Constitutional Policy and Change in Europe, ed. Joachim Jens Hesse and Nevil Johnson (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), 250.Google Scholar
  23. 27.
    Adam Przeworski calls democracy a “system for processing conflicts without killing one another.” See his Democracy and the Market (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 28.
    Guillermo O’Donnell and Philippe C. Schmitter, Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986); see also Przeworski, Democracy and the Market.Google Scholar
  25. 29.
    See Jon Elster, ed., The Roundtable Talks and the Breakdown of Communism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  26. 30.
    Mansoor Moaddel, Class, Politics and Ideology in the Iranian Revolution (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), 272.Google Scholar
  27. 32.
    Stephen Holmes, “Precommitment and the Paradox of Democracy,” chap. 7 in Constitutionalism and Democracy, ed. Jon Elster and Rune Slagstad (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 195.Google Scholar
  28. 33.
    Andrew Arato, From New-Marxism to Democratic Theory: Essays on the Critical Theory of Soviet-Type Societies (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1993), 298–303.Google Scholar
  29. 34.
    Seyla Benhabib, “Hannah Arendt and the Redemptive Power of Narrative,” chap. 5 in Hannah Arendt: Critical Essays, ed. Lewis P. Hinchman and Sandra K. Hinchman (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994), 127.Google Scholar
  30. 35.
    Charles Taylor, Philosophy and the Human Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 19. A caveat is in order because while we can easily verify whether or not a particular policy has been adopted as a matter of law, we might still disagree on whether the policies were implemented and whether they had significant consequences.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 36.
    See Ole R. Holsti, Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1969) and Martha Cooper, Analyzing Public Discourse (Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, 1989).Google Scholar
  32. 38.
    Giuseppe Di Palma, To Craft Democracies: An Essay on Democratic Transitions (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990), 109.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Noel Calhoun 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Noel Calhoun

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations