The Architecture of Mobility: Outdoor Advertising and the Birth of the Strip
During the automobility boom of the 1920s, the billboard industry came to re-evaluate its assumptions about the distribution of audiences and the best placement of advertising. With the widespread use of cars, the market was no longer confined by geographic, political, or even business-district boundaries. The market now moved. Mobile audiences expanded outward from the compact urban market of yesteryear and seemed to draw no new market boundary in their wake. In effect, mobile traffic itself constituted the new marketplace. Recognizing this, advertisers predicted and promoted new commercial developments far from traditional business centers. They did this partly through an architecture of mobility that acclimated motorists to an ex-urban culture of spectacle and an auto-oriented consumer landscape, where drivers were encouraged to window shop right through the windshield. Moreover, outdoor advertisers helped develop fringe areas, laying the pavement for the birth of the commercial strip and the urban sprawl that came to the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. By recognizing a mobile market, charting its patterns, inscribing those patterns onto the landscape through an architecture of mobility, and promoting the commercial strip— the ideal space for mobile consumption— outdoor advertisers would help to define the shape of the decentralizing environment. Outdoor advertising emerges as a significant missing element in the story of commercial growth and urban deconcentration.
KeywordsReal Estate Main Street Shopping Center Gasoline Station National Branding
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Self-service shopping was significantly different from prior experiences, as there was no clerk to ask about or suggest a product. This made the package and the brand all the more important. Kerwin H. Fulton, “Advertising Today,” OAA News 30, no. 4 (April 1940): 1.Google Scholar
- 3.The Wrigley tropical fish spectacular cost $8,000 per month on an eight-year contract. Some advertisers felt the signs in Times Square had limited impact on actual sales, since visitors to the site were tourists, and were not aiming to buy the gum or washing machines advertised. They acknowledged, however, that these spectaculars did bring the manufacturer great attention nevertheless. “Representatives’ Meeting— Friday, July 6, 1928,” 15, J. Walter Thompson Staff Meeting Minutes, Hartman Center, Duke University; “World’s Largest Electrical Unit Begins Operation,” OAA News 26, no. 4 (April 1936): 1; “The World’s Largest Spectacular,” Signs of the Times 82, no. 4 (April 1936): 7–9; “A Brief History of Electric Advertising Displays,” Printers’ Ink Monthly, March 1931, 94–96. See William Taylor, ed., Inventing Times Square: Commerce and Culture at the Crossroads of the World (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1991)Google Scholar
- David Nye, Electrifying America: Social Meanings of a New Technology (Cambridge, Mass., and London: The MIT Press, 1990), 73–84Google Scholar
- William Leach, Land of Desire: Merchants, Money, and the Rise of a New American Culture (New York: Vintage, 1993), 340–348Google Scholar
- Tama Starr and Edward Hayman, Signs and Wonders (New York: Currency-Doubleday, 1998), 88–131.Google Scholar
- 19.Margaret Marsh, Suburban Lives (New Brunswick and London: Rutgers University Press, 1990,), xiii–xiv.Google Scholar
- 34.Richard Longstreth, The Drive-in, the Supermarket, and the Transformation of Commercial Space in Los Angeles, 1914–1941 (Cambridge, Mass., and London: The MIT Press, 1999), 48Google Scholar
- M. Jeffrey Hardwick, Mall Maker: Victor Gruen, Architect of an American Dream (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004), 62–65Google Scholar
- John A. Jakle and Keith A. Sculle, The Gas Station in America (Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994), 146.Google Scholar
- 38.J. C. Nichols, “The Planning and Control of Outlying Shopping Centers,” Journal of Land and Public Utility Economics, January 1926, 17; John Ihlder, “The Automobile and Community Planning,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 116 (November 1924): 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 51.Jim Heimann, California Crazy & Beyond: Roadside Vernacular Architecture (San Francisco: Chronicle Books, 2001), 50.Google Scholar
- 55.Richard S. Tedlow, New and Improved: The Story of Mass Marketing in America (New York: Basic Books, 1990), 238Google Scholar