Advertisement

Acting Like a Colossus: Bush’s Foreign Policy, Unilateralism, and the Pursuit of Primacy

  • Jon Kraus

Abstract

One encounters many apparent contradictions when one tries to understand and explain the foreign policies of George W. Bush and company. Bush pledged as a candidate to “renew strong and intimate relationships with allies,” especially America’s traditional allies in Europe. Yet he has, before and after 9/11, treated the policy concerns and status of America’s allies with dismissiveness, on everything from the Kyoto treaty on global warming to the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty. Bush and his foreign policy aide, Condoleezza Rice, vowed privately and publicly to avoid the policies and weaknesses of the Clinton administration, to restore an image of presidential strength. Yet the Bush government has regularly shown itself riven helplessly by open internal policy conflicts, which George Bush proved mostly incapable of resolving. Thus the U.S. government has conveyed the distinct impression abroad and at home of policy paralysis, or retreat. After the 9/11 attacks Bush declared that he would build a worldwide coalition against terrorism, which he, Powell, and Rumsfeld did. But after the successful war against the Taliban and al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, the U.S. government deflected its focus from pursuit of al-Qaeda forces to mount offensive plans against the “axis of evil,” specifically Iraq. This quickly divided severely the political coalition of support so important in the “war on terror.” U.S. unilateralism in policy postures and brash behavior returned in full force.

Keywords

Foreign Policy International Criminal Court Bush Administration Palestinian Authority Missile Defense 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Compare a preelection statement of Bush administration’s goals, in Condoleezza Rice, “Promoting the National Interest,” Foreign Affairs 79:1 (January/February 2000), 45–62 with White House, “President Bush Delivers Graduation Speech at West Point,” June 2, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    See Stanley Hoffmann, “The United States and International Organizations,” in Robert J. Lieber, ed., Eagle Rules? (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002), 344–352.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    See White House, “President Bush Delivers Graduation Speech…” June 2, 2002;Google Scholar
  4. White House, “The National Security Strategy of the United States,” September 20, 2002, http://www.nytimes.com/; Nicholas Lehman, “The Next World Order,” New Yorker, April 1, 2002, 42–48.Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    Joseph Stiglitz, Globalization and Its Discontents (New York: W. W. Norton, 2002);Google Scholar
  6. Jeffrey Sachs, “The IMF and the Asian Flu,” The American Prospect 8 (March-April 1998), 16–21.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    See Eugene Wittkopf, ed., The Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy, 3rd edition (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Litdefield, 1999);Google Scholar
  8. John Ikenberry, ed., American Foreign Policy, 2nd edition (New York: Harper/Collins, 1996), parts 4–7.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    Rebecca K. C. Hersman, Friends and Foes: How Congress and the President Really Make Foreign Policy (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2000);Google Scholar
  10. John Spanier and Eric Uslaner, American Foreign Policy Making and the Democratic Dilemma, 6th edition (New York: Macmillan, 1994), 104–204.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    See chapters in Ralph G. Carter, ed., Contemporary Cases in U.S. Foreign Policy (Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly, 2002), on Bosnia, Kosovo, and Kyoto Protocol.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    See recent studies in Brigitte Nacos, Robert Shapiro, and Pierangelo Isernia, eds., Decision-Making in a Glass House (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Litdefield, 2000).Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    See Ivo Daalder, “Knowing When to Say No,” in William Durch, ed., UN Peacekeeping, American Politics, and the Uncivil Wars of the 1990’s (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1996), 35–44.Google Scholar
  14. 17.
    G. William Domhoff, The Higher Circles (New York: Vintage, 1970), chapter 5.Google Scholar
  15. 18.
    Lars Shoultz, National Security and United States Policy toward Latin America (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987), 3–33.Google Scholar
  16. 29.
    See Michael Gordon and Bernard Trainor, The Generals’ War (Boston, MA: Little Brown, 1995).Google Scholar
  17. 34.
    See Bill Minutaglio, First Son: George W. Bush (New York: Times Books, 1999), chapters 2–5.Google Scholar
  18. 46.
    See Alexander Dallin and Gail Lapidus, “Reagan and the Russians,” in Oye, Lieber, and Rothchild, eds., Eagle Resurgent? (Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company, 1983), 194–207.Google Scholar
  19. 48.
    See Lester Thurow, Head to Head (New York: Morrow, 1992);Google Scholar
  20. Michael Dertouzos, Richard Lester, and Robert Solow, Made in America: Regaining the Productive Edge (Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1989).Google Scholar
  21. 87.
    Bruce Cummings, “North Korea: The Sequel,” Current History 102 (April 2003), 147–151.Google Scholar
  22. 90.
    See John Newhouse, Imperial America (New York: Knopf, 2003), 122–137.Google Scholar
  23. 95.
    A useful guide is William Quandt, Peace Process (Washington DC: Brookings Institution, new edition, 2001).Google Scholar
  24. 96.
    Sara Roy, “Why Peace Failed: An Oslo Autopsy,” Current History 101 (January 2002), 8–16.Google Scholar
  25. 98.
    See Khalil Shikaki, “Palestinians Divided,” Foreign Affairs 81:3 (January/February 2002), 89–105. See changes in Palestinian public opinion on support for peace negotiations vs. violent means http://www.pcpsr.org.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 102.
    Amnesty International, “Israel and the Occupied Territories,” Journal of Palestinian Studies, 30:4 (Summer 2001), 143–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 113.
    See Michael O’Hanlon, “A Flawed Masterpiece,” Foreign Affairs 81:3 (May/June 2002), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 114.
    Anatol Lieven, “The Pressures on Pakistan,” Foreign Affairs 81:1 (January/February 2002), 106–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 115.
    Goldgeier and McFaul, “George W. Bush and Russia,” Current History 101 (October 2002), 316–321.Google Scholar
  30. 117.
    See Grenville Byford, “The Wrong War,” Foreign Affairs, 81:4 (July/August 2002), 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 122.
    John Newhouse, Imperial America (New York: Knopf, 2003), 40–61.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jon Kraus, Kevin J. McMahon, and David M. Rankin 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jon Kraus

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations