Skip to main content

Changing the Tone? Congressional-Presidential Relations in the Second Bush Administration

  • Chapter
Transformed by Crisis

Abstract

George W. Bush entered the presidency with a pledge to return bipartisanship to political life in the nation’s capital, to end partisan bickering between the congressional parties and restore comity, and to work with Democrats in crafting important public policies and forging broad support. But once in office, James A. Thurber observes, he veered to the Right on an array of issues, including environmental protection, Social Security, missile defense, and health care.1 Even the tragic events of September 11th could only intermittendy temper partisan instincts, with Democrats warning the Bush administration that it was pushing its wartime agenda too aggressively and too quickly (just two weeks) after the terrorist attacks. To what extent therefore has the Bush administration pursued accommodative tactics in crafting legislation and winning coalitions? Was the call for bipartisanship largely political pretense? And what has been the nature of the relationship between the Bush White House and members of Congress?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. James A. Thurber, “An Introduction to Presidential-Congressional Rivalry,” in James A. Thurber, ed., Rivals for Power: Presidential-Congressional Relations, 2nd edition (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mark A. Peterson, “The President and Congress,” in Michael Nelson, ed., The Presidency and the Political System, 5th edition (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eric M. Uslaner, The Decline of Comity in Congress (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edward S. Corwin, The President: Office and Powers, 1787–1957, 4th edition (New York: New York University Press, 1957), 171.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Leroy N. Rieselbach, “One Vote at a Time: Building Presidential Coalitions in Congress,” in James A. Thurber, ed., Rivals for Power: Presidential-Congressional Relations, 1st edition (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Roger H. Davidson and Colton C. Campbell, “The Senate and the Executive,” in Burdett A. Loomis, ed., Esteemed Colleagues: Civility and Deliberation in the U.S. Senate (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Norman J. Ornstein, Thomas E. Mann, and Michael J. Malbin, Vital Statistics on Congress 1999–2000 (Washington, DC: The AEI Press, 2000), 191.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Michael Foley and John E. Owens, Congress and the Presidency: Institutional Politics in a Separated System (Manchester University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kenneth E. Collier, Between the Branches: The White House Office of Legislative Affairs (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robert A. Katzmann, Courts & Congress (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1997);

    Google Scholar 

  11. and David M. O’Brien, Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics, 5th edition (W.W. Norton & Company, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Calvin Mackenzie & Robert Shoga, “The Presidential Appointment Process: Historical Development, Contemporary Operations, Current Issues,” in Obstacle Course: The Report of the Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on the Presidential Appointment Process (New York: The Twentieth Century Fund Press, 1981), 186.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Glenn R. Krutz, Richard Fleisher, and Jon Bond, “From Abe Fortas to Zoe Baird: Why Some Presidential Nominations Fail in the Senate,” American Political Science Review 92 (1998), 871–881.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mark Silverstein, Judicious Choices: The New Politics of Supreme Court Confirmations (W. W. Norton & Co., 1994), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer, “Congress and the Emerging Order: Assessing the 2000 Elections,” in Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer, eds., Congress Reconsidered, 7th edition (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gary W. Cox and Mathew D. McCubbins, Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1993);

    Google Scholar 

  17. and Roger H. Davidson, “Congressional Parties, Leaders, and Committees: 1900, 2000, and Beyond,” in Jeffrey E. Cohen, Richard Fleisher, and Paul Kantor, eds., American Political Parties: Decline or Resurgence? (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Robin Kolodny, “Moderate Success: Majority Status and the Changing Nature of Factionalism in the House Republican Party,” in Nicol C. Rae and Colton C. Campbell, eds., New Majority or Old Minority? The Impact of Republicans on Congress (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Norman J. Ornstein and Thomas E. Mann, eds., The Permanent Campaign and Its Future (Washington, DC: The AEI Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  20. William S. Cohen, “Farewell Address,” in Norman J. Ornstein, ed., Lessons and Legacies: Farewell Addresses from the Senate (New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 1997), 46.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Joseph Cooper and Garry Young, “Party and Preference in Congressional Decision Making: Roll Call Voting in the House of Representatives, 1889–1999,” in David W. Brady and Mathew D. McCubbins, eds., Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2002); and Robert S. Erickson and Gerald C. Wright, “Voters, Candidates, and Issues in Congressional Elections,” in Dodd and Oppenheimer, eds., Congress Reconsidered, 7th edition.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Steven E. Schier, By Invitation Only: The Rise of Exclusive Politics in the United States (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Roger H. Davidson and Walter J. Oleszek, Congress and Its Members, 7th edition (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2000), 191.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nicol C. Rae, Conservative Reformers: The Republican Freshmen and the Lessons of the 104th Congress (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1998);

    Google Scholar 

  25. and Eric M. Uslaner, The Movers and the Shakers: Representatives and Ideologues in the Senate (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Steven S. Smith, “Forces of Change in Senate Party Leadership and Organization,” in Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer, eds., Congress Reconsidered, 5th edition (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1993);

    Google Scholar 

  27. and Norman J. Ornstein, Robert L. Peabody, and David W. Rohde, “The U.S. Senate: Toward the 21st Century,” in Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer, eds., Congress Reconsidered, 6th edition (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nicol C. Rae, Southern Democrats (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Barbara Sinclair, “The President as Legislative Leader,” in Colin Campbell and Bert A. Rockman, eds., The Clinton Legacy (Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Alexander Hamilton, in Clinton Rossiter, ed., Federalist Papers (New York: New American Library, 1961), 62.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Barbara Sinclair, “The Senate Leadership Dilemma: Passing Bills and Pursuing Partisan Advantage in a Nonmajoritarian Chamber,” in Colton C. Campbell and Nicol C. Rae, eds., The Contentious Senate: Partisanship, Ideology, and the Myth of Cool Judgment (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nicol C. Rae, Southern Democrats (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Marjorie Randon Hershey and Paul Allen Beck, Party Politics in America, 10th edition (New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers, Inc., 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nicol C. Rae and Colton C. Campbell, Partisan Proceedings: The Congressional Impeachment of President Bill Clinton (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Richard E. Neustadt, Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: The Politics of Leadership From Roosevelt to Reagan, 3rd edition (New York: The Free Press, 1990), 29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2004 Jon Kraus, Kevin J. McMahon, and David M. Rankin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Campbell, C.C., Watson, R.P. (2004). Changing the Tone? Congressional-Presidential Relations in the Second Bush Administration. In: Kraus, J., McMahon, K.J., Rankin, D.M. (eds) Transformed by Crisis. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-06449-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics