Abstract
President George W. Bush received a historic rally in American public support following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The opinion rally was so unprecedented that it took over two years for President Bush’s approval rating to finally descend back to pre-9/11 levels. The media, in particular, played a critical role in rallying public opinion around President Bush, the administration’s leadership and policy agenda.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
John Kingdon, Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (Boston: Little, Brown, 1995);
Jeffrey Peake, “Presidential Agenda Setting in Foreign Policy,” Political Research Quarterly 54 (2001), 69–86.
Jeffrey E. Cohen, “Presidential Rhetoric and the Public Agenda,” American Journal of Political Science 39 (1995), 87–107.
Joanne Miller and Jon Krosnick, “News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens are Guided by a Trusted Source,” American Journal of Political Science 44 (2000), 301–315.
George Edwards III, William Mitchell, and Reed Welch, “Explaining Presidential Approval: The Significance of Issue Salience,” American Journal of Political Science 39 (1995), 108–134.
Donald R. Kinder and D. Roderick Kiewiet, “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case,” British Journal of Political Science 11 (1981), 129–161;
Michael Mackuen, Robert Erikson, and James Stimson, “Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and U.S. Economy,” American Political Science Review 89 (1992), 1125–1142.
Aaron Wildavsky concluded in his “two presidencies” thesis that presidents have significantly better records on foreign policy than on domestic policy. In foreign affairs, presidents are granted more authority, consensus, and active role. Aaron Wildavsky, “The Two Presidencies,” in Steven A. Shull, ed., The Two Presidencies: A Quarter Century Assessment (Chicago: Nelson Hall, 1991), 11–25.
See also, Douglas Foyle, Counting the Public In: Presidents, Public Opinion, and Poreig Policy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999);
Paul Peterson, “The President’s Dominance in Foreign Policy Making,” Political Science Quarterly 109 (1994), 215–234.
Jeffery Mondak, “Source Cues and Policy Approval: The Cognitive Dynamics of Public Support for the Reagan Agenda” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1993), 186–212;
Mark Peffley, Ronald Langley, and Robert Goidel, “Public Response to the Presidential Use of Military Force,” Political Behavior 17 (1995), 307–337.
W. Lance Bennett and Jarol Manheim, “Taking the Public by Storm: Information, Cuing, and the Democratic Process in the Gulf Conflict,” Political Communication 10 (1993), 331–351.
Samuel Kernell, “Explaining Presidential Popularity,” American Political Science Review 72 (1978), 513.
W. Russell Neuman, “Patterns of Recall among Television News Viewers,” Public Opinion Quarterly 40 (1976), 115–123.
See, for example, Shanto Iyengar and Adam Simon, “News Coverage of the Gulf Crisis and Public Opinion: A Study of Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing,” Communication Research 20 (1993), 365–383;
Bruce Jentleson, “The Pretty Prudent Public: Post-Vietnam American Opinion on the Use of Military Force,” International Studies Quarterly 36 (1992), 49–74.
Doris Graber, Processing Politics: Learning from Television in the Internet Age (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001), 2–3.
Donald Jordan and Benjamin Page, “Shaping Foreign Policy Opinions: The Role of TV News,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36 (1992), 227–241;
Iyengar, Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991).
Limor Peer and Beatrice Chestnut, “Deciphering Media Independence: The Gulf War Debate in Television and Newspaper News,” Political Communication 12 (1995), 81–95; Iyengar and Simon, “News Coverage of the Gulf Crisis and Public Opinion.”
Full-text media sources are found to be more reliable indicators of actual media coverage than are proxies from index entries and abstracts. Index entries can oversimplify policy positions attributed to various sources, and these proxies can underestimate policy statements from the administration. See, Scott Althaus, Jill Edy, and Patricia Phalen, “Using Substitutes for Full-Text News Stories in Content Analysis: Which Text is Best?” American Journal of Political Science 45 (2001), 707–723.
Brody, Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1991), 110–111.
Matthew McCombs and Jian-Hua Zhu, “Capacity, Diversity, and Volatility of the Public Agenda,” Public Opinion Quarterly 59 (1995), 495–525.
Jon Krosnick and Donald Kinder, “Altering the Foundations of Support for the President through Priming,” American Political Science Review 84 (1990), 497–512.
J. R. Lee, “Rallying ‘Round the Flag: Foreign Policy Events and Presidential Popularity,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 7 (1977), 252–256.
Bernard Cohen, The Press and Foreign Policy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963).
Robert Goidel and Ronald Langley, “Media Coverage of the Economy and Aggregate Economic Evaluations,” Political Research Quarterly 48 (1994), 313–328.
Howard Lavine and J. Sullivan, “The Relationship of National and Personal Issue Salience to Attitude Accessibility on Foreign and Domestic Policy Issues,” Political Psychology 17 (1996), 293–315.
John Mueller, War, Presidents and Public Opinion (New York: Wiley, 1973), 209.
John Oneal, Bradley Lian, and J. H. Joyner, “Are the American People Pretty Prudent? Public Responses to US Uses of Force,” International Studies Quarterly 40 (1996), 265.
Zhongdang Pan and Gerald Kosicki, “Voters’ Reasoning Processes and Media Influences During the Persian Gulf War,” Political Behavior 16 (1994), 117–156; Bennett and Manheim, “Taking the Public by Storm,” 335–341.
We coded coverage of Democratic partisan opposition, yet there were also some instances of bipartisan criticism of presidential policy, which are found to be particularly damaging to presidential evaluation. See Benjamin Page, Robert Shapiro, and Glen Dempsey, “What Moves Public Opinion?” American Political Science Review 81 (1987), 38–40.
Daniel C. Hallin, “The Media, the War in Vietnam, and Political Support,” Journal of Politics 46 (1984), 2–24; Peer and Chestnut, “Deciphering Media Independence,” 89.
Matthew Baum, “The Constituent Foundations of the Rally-Round-the-Flag Phenomenon,” International Studies Quarterly 46 (2002), 269.
Bradley Lian and John Oneal, “Presidents, the Use of Military Force and Public Opinion,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 37 (1993), 277–300;
John Zaller, The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992).
Benjamin Page and Robert Y. Shapiro, The Rational Public: Fifty Tears of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).
J. Meernik and P. Waterman, “The Myth of the Diversionary Use of Force by American Presidents,” Political Research Quarterly 49 (1996), 573–590.
Samuel Kernell, Going Public, 3rd edition (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1997);
Bruce Miroff, “The Presidency and the Public: Leadership as Spectacle,” in Michael Nelson, ed., The Presidency and the Political System, 5th edition (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1998).
Robert D. Putnam, “Bowling Together,” American Prospect 13:3 (2002), 1–4.
George C. Edwards III and B. Dan Wood, “Who Influences Whom? The President, the Media, and the Public Agenda,” American Political Science Review 93 (1999), 327–344.
B. Dan Wood and Jeffrey Peake, “The Dynamics of Foreign Policy Agenda Setting,” American Political Science Review 92 (1998), 173–184.
Frank Baumgartner and Bryan Jones, Agendas and Instability in American Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2004 Jon Kraus, Kevin J. McMahon, and David M. Rankin
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rankin, D.M. (2004). The Press, the Public, and the Two Presidencies of George W. Bush. In: Kraus, J., McMahon, K.J., Rankin, D.M. (eds) Transformed by Crisis. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-06449-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-06449-3_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-60221-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-06449-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)