Whispering Secrets to a Dark Age

  • Paul Edward Dutton
Part of the The New Middle Ages book series (TNMA)


To my ear one of the most beautiful of all Latin words is the onomatopoeic susurrus, whispering, which evokes in me a measure of regret over the loss of so many medieval mutterings and airy thoughts that would, had they survived, have promised (though that too, I realize, is an illusion) to complete us and make what we do whole. Or is history like the courtroom where hearsay should be dismissed as untestable evidence by responsible weighers of fact?


Secret Message Ninth Century Modern Reader Confidential Message Court Society 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 6.
    For a useful survey of the topic, see Sissela Bok, Secrets: On the Ethics of Concealment and Revelation (New York, 1982). On the social history of secrets in the Middle Ages, seeGoogle Scholar
  2. Karma Lochrie, Covert Operations: The Medieval Uses of Secrecy (Philadelphia, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 7.
    Even Charlemagne’s capitularies had force from the fact that he ‘said them’ in public. On issues of literacy and orality in the early Middle Ages, see Rosamond McKitterick, The Carolingians and the Written Word (Cambridge, 1989); The Uses of Literacy in Early Medieval Europe, ed. Rosamond McKitterick (Cambridge, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Michel Banniard, Viva Voce: communication ecrite et communication orale du IVe au IXe siecle en Occident latin (Paris, 1992); andGoogle Scholar
  5. D.H. Green, Medieval Listening and Writing: The Primary Reception of German Literature, 800–1300 (Cambridge, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 10.
    On the sacerdotal function of kings, see Ernst Kantorowicz, The King’s Two Bodies: A Study of Mediaeval Political Theology (Princeton, 1957).Google Scholar
  7. 16.
    Gregory the Great, Dialogues 2.20, in PL 66:172B4–5. Also trans. Myra L. Uhlfelder, The Dialogues of Gregory the Great. Book Two: Saint Benedict (Indianapolis, 1967), p. 29. And see the examples of Benedict’s powers of observation in 2.16–20 (PL 66:164A-172B).Google Scholar
  8. 20.
    On Gottschalk’s career, see D.E. Nineham, “Gottschalk of Orbais: Reactionary or Precursor of the Reformation,” Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 40 (1989): 1–18 andCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. David Ganz, “The Debate on Predestination,” in Charles the Bald: Court and Kingdom, 2nd rev. ed., ed. Margaret T. Gibson and Janet L. Nelson (Aldershot, 1990), pp. 283–302.Google Scholar
  10. 23.
    Notker, Gesta Karoli Magni 2.12, ed. H.E Haefele, in MGH: Scriptores rerum Germanicarum, Nova Series 12 (Berlin, 1959), p. 72. Also trans. Lewis Thorpe, in Einhard and Notker the Stammerer: Two Lives of Charlemagne (Harmondsworth, 1969).Google Scholar
  11. 30.
    See Pactus Legis Salicae 30.7, ed. Karl August Eckhardt, in MGH: Legum, Sectio I: Leges Nationum Germanicarum, vol. 4.1 (Hanover, 1962), p. 120. Also trans. Katherine Fischer Drew, The Laws of the Salian Franks (Philadelphia, 1991). And see the revised Lex Salica Karolina 70.6, ed. Eckhardt, in MGH: Legum, Sectio I: Leges Nationum Germanicarum, vol. 4.2 (Hanover, 1969), p. 228.Google Scholar
  12. 36.
    See William Eamon, Science and the Secrets of Nature: Books of Secrets in Medieval and Early Modem Culture (Princeton, 1994), especially pp. 15–90.Google Scholar
  13. 77.
    Einhard, Translatio 1.1–2.3, ed. Waitz, pp. 239–46; and trans. Dutton, in Charlemagne’s Courtier, pp. 69–87. And see Marguerite Bondois, La Translation des saints Marcellin et Pierre: Etudes sur Einhard et sa vie politique de 827 a 834 (Paris, 1907).Google Scholar
  14. 79.
    See Patrick J. Geary, Furta Sacra: Thefts of Relics in the Central Middle Ages, rev. ed. (Princeton, 1990).Google Scholar
  15. 80.
    Herodotus 7.239 and Aulus Gellius, Noctes Atticae 17.9.16–17. Aulus Gellius, Noctes Atticae 17.9.21, also reported a variation on the same, but with the human body used as a surface: see chapter 1 in this book. See also Jocelyn Penny Small, Wax Tablets of the Mind: Cognitive Studies of Memory and Literacy in Classical Antiquity (London, 1997), p. 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 82.
    Theodulf of Orleans, carmen 25, ed. Dummler, p. 487.147–50; and see Peter Godman, Poetry of the Carolingian Renaissance (Norman, Okla., 1985), pp. 156–57.Google Scholar
  17. 83.
    On wax tablets in the Middle Ages, see Elisabeth Lalou, “Inventaire des tablettes medievales et presentation generate,” in Les tablettes a ecrire de Van-tiquite a Vepoque moderne: Actes du colloque international du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, Institut de France, 10–11 octohre 1990, ed. Elisabeth Lalou (Turnhout, 1992), pp. 233–80Google Scholar
  18. Richard H. Rouse and Mary A. Rouse, “The Vocabulary of Wax Tablets,” in Vocabulaire du livre et de Vecriture au moyen age:Actes de la table ronde, Paris 24–26 septembre 1987, ed. Olga Weijers (Turnhout, 1989), pp. 220–30 and a revised version of the same in Harvard Library Bulletin, new series, 1 (1990): 12–19;Google Scholar
  19. Richard H. Rouse and Mary A. Rouse, “Wax Tablets,” in Language & Communication, 9 (1989): 175–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 93.
    On the survival of medieval letters, see Giles Constable, Letters and Letter Collections, in Typologie des Sources du moyen age occidentale, 17 (Turnhout, 1976) andGoogle Scholar
  21. Mary Garrison, ‘“Send More Socks’: On Mentality and the Preservation Context of Medieval Letters,” in New Approaches to Medieval Communication, ed. Marco Mostert (Turnhout, 1999), pp. 69–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 96.
    See Genevra Kornbluth, Engraved Gems of the Carolingian Empire (University Park, Penn., 1995), pp. 76–84. For a sample of Carolingian signatures, see J. Mabillon, De re diplomatica. . . , vol. 1 (Naples, 1789), pp. 469–71 (tab. 54–55).Google Scholar
  23. 117.
    It is not certain that Carolingian readers automatically noticed or, indeed, looked for acrostics. Dhuoda in her Manual for her sixteen-year-old son William employed acrostics, but was not sure he would discern them and so drew his attention to how he should read them. See Dhuoda, Liber manualis, epigram 88–89 and 10.2, ed. Pierre Riche, Dhuoda, Manuel pour mon Jils, in Sources chretiennes, vol. 235 (Paris, 1975), pp. 78, 340. Also trans.Google Scholar
  24. Carol Neel, Handbook for William: A Carolingian Woman’s Counsel for Her Son (Lincoln, 1991).Google Scholar
  25. 119.
    See the samples provided in De antiquis episcoporum promotionibus, PL 129:1381C-1398C and A. Giry, Manuel de diplomatique (Paris, 1893), pp. 810–812.Google Scholar
  26. 121.
    De inventione linguarum, PL 112:1581–82; reedited by R. Derolez, Runica manuscripta: the English Tradition (Bruges, 1954), pp. 349–53, with an extensive description of the manuscripts and a commentary, pp. 279–383. The sample encryption supplied at PL 112:1581 contains several mistakes. It should read, once resolved, as:Google Scholar
  27. 125.
    For an edition of the text, see Rene Derolez, “Dubthach s Cryptogram: Some Notes in Connexion with Brussels MS. 9565–9566,” L’antiquite clas-sique, 21 (1952): 368[359–75] andGoogle Scholar
  28. James E Kenney, The Sources for the Early History of Ireland: An Introduction and Guide, vol. 1: Ecclesiastical (New York, 1929), p. 556.Google Scholar
  29. 134.
    See Walter Goffart, The Le Mans Forgeries: A Chapter from the History of Church Property in the Ninth Century (Cambridge, Mass., 1966).Google Scholar
  30. 135.
    See Roger E. Reynolds, “The Organisation, Law and Liturgy of the Western Church, 700–900,” in The New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. 2: cJOO-c.900, ed. Rosamond McKitterick (Cambridge, 1995), pp. 616–617.Google Scholar
  31. 136.
    Quoted in Donald G. McNeil, Jr., “Killer Songs,” The New York Times Magazine, March 17, 2002, p. 59.Google Scholar
  32. 137.
    See PaulWillem Finsterwalder, “Eine parteipolitische Kundgebung eines Anhangers Lothars I,” Neues Archiv, 47 (1928): 393–415.Google Scholar
  33. 138.
    James Westfall Thompson and Saul K. Padover, Secret Diplomacy: Espionage and Cryptography, 1500–1815 (New York, 1937), p. 255, but they assume wrongly that Lothar himself was the author of the collection.Google Scholar
  34. 140.
    See also Janet L. Nelson, “The Search for Peace in a Time of War: The Carolingian Briiderkrieg, 840–843,” Trager und Instrumentarien des Friedens im hohen und spaten Mittelalter, ed. Johannes Fried (Sigmaringen, 1996), pp. 100–101.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Paul Edward Dutton 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Edward Dutton

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations