Skip to main content

Deconstruction and Technology

  • Chapter
Deconstructions

Abstract

In 1950 the English mathematician Alan Turing, one of the inventors of the computer, proposed a thought experiment that has since become crucial in debates about ‘machine intelligence’ (Turing, 1950). In his ‘imitation game’ Turing proposed that three players, each in separate rooms, be allowed to communicate by writing. Two of the players, a man and a woman, are questioned by the third, a judge. The man’s task is to convince the judge that he is in fact a she. He wins if the judge either cannot decide or decides wrongly about the gender of the other player.1 Turing then proposed that the place of the man be taken by an ‘intelligent’ machine. The game remains the same, but the role of the judge is now to decide which of the players is human. Turing proposed the imitation game as a pragmatic way to deal with the question ‘can machines think?’ It has long been known as the Turing test.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  • Bateson, Gregory (1973), Steps to an Ecology of Mind (St Albans: Granada).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beardsworth, Richard (1996), Derrida and the Political (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennington, Geoffrey (1993), ‘Derridabase’, in G. Bennington and J. Derrida, Jacques Derrida (Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennington, Geoffrey (1996), ‘Emergencies’ [rev. of Beardsworth and Stiegler], in Derridas, vol. 18 of The Oxford Literary Review, pp. 175–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bynum, Terrell Ward and James H. Moor (eds) (1998), The Digital Phoenix: How Computers are Changing Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Calinescu, Matei (1993), ‘Orality to Literacy: Some Historical Paradoxes of Reading’, The Yale Journal of Criticism, 6, pp. 175–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Timothy (1988), ‘Computers as Universal Mimics: Derrida’s Question of Mimesis and the Status of ‘Artificial Intelligence’, Philosophy Today, 29, pp. 302–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Timothy (1992), ‘The Turing Test as a Novel Form of Hermeneutics’, International Studies in Philosophy, 24, pp. 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel (1988), ‘Can Machines Think?’, in Daniel Dennett, Brainstorms: Essays on Designing Minds (Harmondsworth, Peguin), pp. 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques (1976), Of Grammatology, trans. G. C. Spivak (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques (1978a), Edmund Husserl’s Origin of Geometry: An Introduction, trans. and ed. John P. Leavey (Sussex: Harvester Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques (1978b), Writing and Difference, trans. Alan Bass (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques (1981), ‘Plato’s Pharmacy’, in Dissemination, trans. Barbara Johnson (Chicago, IL:. University of Chicago Press), pp. 63–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques (1982), ‘The Pit and the Pyramid: Introduction to Hegel’s Semiology’, in Margins of Philosophy, trans. Alan Bass (Sussex: Harvester Press), pp. 69–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques (1983), ‘The Principle of Reason: The University in the Eyes of its Pupils’, trans. Catherine Porter and Edward P. Morris, Diacritics (Fall), pp. 6–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques (1986a), Glas, trans. John P. Leavey Jr and Richard Rand (Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques (1986b), Mémoires: for Paul de Man, trans. Cecile Lindsay et al. (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques (1987a), ‘Geschlecht II: Heidegger’s Hand’, trans. John P. Leavey Jr, in Deconstruction and Philosophy: The Texts of Jacques Derrida, ed. John Sallis (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 161–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques (1987b), The Post Card: From Socrates to Freud and Beyond, trans. Alan Bass (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques (1989a), Of Spirit: Heidegger and the Question, trans. Geoffrey Bennington and Rachel Bowlby (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques (1989b) ‘Psyche: Inventions of the Other’, in Lindsay Waters and Wlad Godzich (eds), Reading de Man Reading (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 25–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques (1994), Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, & the New International, trans. Peggy Kamuf (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques (1995), Points... Interviews, 1974–1994, ed. Elizabeth Weber, trans. Peggy Kamuf and others (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques (1996a), Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression, trans. Eric Prenowitz (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Presss).

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques and Stiegler, Bernard (1996b), Echographies de la télévision (Paris: Galilée).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, Hubert, L. (1981), ‘From Micro-Worlds to Knowledge Representation: AI at an Impasse’, in Mind Design: Philosophy, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, ed. John Haugland (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 161–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Stuart E. Dreyfus (1986), Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, Hubert (1998), ‘Response to my Critics’, in The Digital Phoenix: How Computers are Changing Philosophy, ed. T. W. Bynum and J. H. Moor (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 193–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumouchel, Paul (1993), ‘Gilbert Simondon’s Plea for a Philosophy of Technology’, Inquiry, 35, pp. 407–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, Terry (1997), Marx (London: Orion).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Harry and Marvin Minsky (1992), The Turing Option (London: ROC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin (1997), The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, trans. William Lovitt (New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, Webster J. (1983), ‘The Aristotelian Versus the Heideggerian Approach to the Problem of Technology’, in Philosophy and Technology: Readings in the Philosophical Problems of Technology, ed. Carl Mitcharn and Robert Mackey (London: The Free Press), pp. 347–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, Marshall (1962), The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, Walter J. (1982), Orality and Literacy: The Technologising of the Word (London and New York: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, Walter J. (1971), Rhetoric, Romance and Technology: Studies in the Interaction of Expression and Culture (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary (1964), ‘Robots: Machines or Artificially Created Life?’, Journal of Philosophy, 61, pp. 668–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler; Bernard (1994), La technique et la temps, 1: La faute de Epiméthée (Paris: Galilée).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing, Alan (1950), ‘Computing Machinery and Intelligence’, Mind, 59, p. 433–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2000 Timothy Clark

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clark, T. (2000). Deconstruction and Technology. In: Royle, N. (eds) Deconstructions. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-06095-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics